Peddler of AI Slop, Satya Nadella, Wants World to Stop Saying AI Slop

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • Peddler of AI Slop, Satya Nadella, Wants World to Stop Saying AI Slop

    How's about no?
    A smug, bald guy. This is Satya Nadella, the CEO of Microsoft.

    Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella doesn't seem to like that fans are being super mean to generative AI. Nadella took to his new website, sn scratchpad, to talk about artificial intelligence, how 2026 will be a "pivotal year for AI," and how people should stop saying AI "slop."

    It should come as no surprise to anybody that Nadella is upset when people rightfully call the output from generative AI "slop." Microsoft is one of the tech industry's largest proponents of generative AI. They have forced it, under the name of Copilot, into too many areas of their operating systems, Edge browser, Bing search, and even their game development studios are using generative AI without any shame.

    Nadella suggests that when it comes to artificial intelligence, we are soon to enter into "a phase of widespread diffusion." He continues on.

    We are beginning to distinguish between 'spectacle' and 'substance'. We now have a clearer sense of where the tech is headed, but also the harder and more important question of how to shape its impact on the world.

    We are still in the opening miles of a marathon. Much remains unpredictable.
    That is to say, Nadella has no actual clue where AI will go in 2026. After this word salad, Nadella follows-up with even more. He channels Steve Jobs with a reference to "bicycles for the mind," and something about how AI should be viewed as "a scaffolding for human potential vs a substitute." Nadella then suggests that Microsoft will eventually figure out how to use AI for "real world impact." Everything said in his blog will surely sound great to those who have already chugged the generative AI Kool-Aid and to shareholders. For everyone else, it's hard not to roll our eyes to the point of dizziness.

    Nadella would really like if everyone just moved beyond calling the output that AI regurgitates as AI "slop."

    We need to get beyond the arguments of slop vs sophistication and develop a new equilibrium in terms of our “theory of the mind” that accounts for humans being equipped with these new cognitive amplifier tools as we relate to each other.(...)

    (W)e need to make deliberate choices on how we diffuse this technology in the world as a solution to the challenges of people and planet. For AI to have societal permission it must have real world eval impact. The choices we make about where we apply our scarce energy, compute, and talent resources will matter. This is the socio-technical issue we need to build consensus around.
    Over the past few years, Microsoft has laid off tens of thousands of employees across essentially all divisions as they continue their march towards a mythical AI future. While the rank and file will continue to be laid off, Microsoft's upper management will continue to heavily invest in AI.

    Microsoft just announced a further $23 billion for AI investments in December 2025.

    • Shawn Zipay
      #1
      Shawn Zipay commented
      Editing a comment
      Nadella is more than welcome to shove his AI slop up his ass.

    • azalea
      #2
      azalea commented
      Editing a comment
      Nice try Nadella. Ironically, today I found out that slop is Merriam-Webster's top word of 2025. For good reason.

    • K-16
      #3
      K-16 commented
      Editing a comment
      Speaking of Merriam-Webster, my word for 2026 is "enfeeble" so I'm already pissed off (I was planning this to be the year I quit because I'm being pushed out) and wondering who has it worse. I regret playing along after reading the repost on BlueSky (reskeet sounds too weird to me).

      Also is there really a "need to make deliberate choices on how we diffuse this technology in the world as a solution to the challenges of people and planet"? (Is his exclusive skill to use fancy words to fail at distracting and confusing his audience, and pray his completed academia hides his lack of intelligence and knowledge?) I thought using AI is the acceptance that we don't give a crap on how much energy it uses, how much cooling it requires to run data centres, and how production of computer hardware needs to ramp up to serve both the AI industry and the consumer market.

      Also is Nadella and Level 5's CEO Hino best friends or something? Hino really killed all desire for me to buy the next Professor Layton. I miss that franchise, but now I don't want it back. Below is a Google translated version of Hino's message on Twitter that I won't bother linking to (especially with their new image edit option that uses and trains so much stolen art into Grok).

      Originally posted by Nadella's Best Buuuudy!
      Today, unusually, I'm going to write about something other than the game I'm making.

      [Regarding the uproar surrounding AI]
      I've seen controversy surrounding Level-5's past announcement that they use AI to improve development efficiency, following an incident in which a certain game developer was stripped of an award due to their use of AI, so I'd like to say a few words about this.

      First of all, I think that currently, many game makers are incorporating AI into game development to improve efficiency. The difference is whether they publicize this or not. That said, it's a big mistake to say that Level-5 has AI writing 80% to 90% of its program code. The truth is, there is an unannounced title with an AI theme, and a programmer for that title has deliberately said that the program is being written by AI as well. I used that example to suggest that such an era might be coming, and that's what exaggerated the point. On the other hand, if 80% to 90% of the code were written by AI, I think that would be amazing and would be highly sought after by people in the AI ​​community. We haven't reached that level yet. However, it's true that AI is enabling significant time savings, and I believe this has the potential to overturn conventional wisdom in game development. We may be heading towards a world where AAA games that everyone wants to play can be played once every two years, rather than the current five to ten years it takes to develop them. AI is sometimes equated with plagiarism, but knives can be used for cooking or as weapons, and computers can be used to create games and even commit cybercrimes. Depending on how AI is used, it may be possible to produce plagiarized content, but if used correctly, it has the power to enrich the creative world.

      I want to see games evolve even further in my lifetime. I want to see and create even more dreamlike games that surpass the standards of current AAA titles. If we create the impression that using AI is bad, it could significantly delay the development of modern digital technology. I hope that creators around the world, and those who receive it, will recognize that AI is a tool used by people to create works. I hope that various technological innovations will lead to further development in the game industry!

      I will post the same information on the development blog later.

    • cikame
      #4
      cikame commented
      Editing a comment
      I've always hated this guy, and over time the reasons why have continued to grow and grow.
    Posting comments is disabled for guests. Login or sign up to leave a comment.

Related Topics

Collapse

TGN on Threads TGN on BlueSky TGN on Facebook
Working...