Intel Takes a Stand Against Gamergate to the Tune of a $300 Million Campaign for Diversity in Tech

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • Intel Takes a Stand Against Gamergate to the Tune of a $300 Million Campaign for Diversity in Tech

    During Intel's keynote today at CES 2015, the company pledged to spend $300 million over the next five years to improve diversity in the tech industry. This campaign aims to address the issues of underrepresentation of women in the industry as well as minorities. This includes working with groups such as the ESL, IGDA, Girls Who Code, Feminst Frequency, and more.

    Intel CEO Brian Krzanich alluded to issues facing the tech industry over the past year, including Gamergate, as some of the main reasons they're making this strong push.
    "Intel believes men and women should be treated the same. And, diversity is an integral part of our corporate strategy and vision with commitments to improve the diversity of our workforce." Today, Krzanich elaborated on that by saying Intel's own internal goal was to reach what he referred to as a "full representation in all levels" in its workforce by 2020. That not only includes its rank and file, but at the executive level as well.

    This move also comes a few months after a lie filled mass spam campaign by Gamergate temporarily found Intel pulling advertising from Gamasutra. While Gamergate took that as a "win" in their book, Intel quickly corrected their mistake by reinstating the ads in relatively short time. Gamergate are, naturally, taking this latest announcement from Intel with all the maturity and respect that you the world has come to expect from them.


    (via The Verge, Twitter, Twitter)

    • Shawn Zipay
      #2
      Shawn Zipay commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by Thortok2000
      A couple of the ones you linked have a good point. Ish.

      I am a strong supporter of equality, but I do feel that sometimes it's done too much resulting in reverse discrimination. There's no reason to assume that Intel is going to do such from what little we know now, but it's certainly a potential concern. Quotas in particular are a pretty annoying way of 'forcing' equality. Then again, it's not like I can think of a better way either. -shrug-

      What methods and manners of equality they are going to implement remain to be seen, I suppose. For instance, what exactly costs $300 million to do? Advertising?
      In a way, I suppose in some cases what they do with the money could be considered advertising, sure. But better still, think of that money being used for educational purposes. You see that money spent on campaigns to entice more diverse people into a field that is typically dominated by white males. So that's not saying they're discriminating at all if suddenly the most qualified for a new position isn't a white male but a black female due simply to that new campaign that enticed her to join and apply herself to be the best in the first place. You'll probably see the money spent on efforts to remove some of the fear associated with entering fields that are dominated by one particular group of people. Etc.

      I think the people flipping their lids about "discrimination" are absolutely mental. A user on Polygon had a great response to cries of this being unfair:



      I can understand a tiny bit of some of the worry here. People are somehow thinking that the people that are least qualified for a position will get it simply because of their gender or race. Has it happened in the past? Sure. Will it happen here? Who knows. I think it's kind of a bullshit worry to have on something that has a very real possibility of not happening. These people feel threatened because they won't be able to compete almost exclusively against other white males any more. They'll have to actually make strides to be unique since these other genders and races that will filter into those fields will bring fresh ideas and perspectives simply because they have led vastly different lives in the first place.

      All of that doesn't matter the second the GamerGate tag is applied to what they're saying. A lot of these people are simply assholes and are not actually upset that Intel is pushing for equality. They are more upset that Intel is aligning themselves with women. Or they are upset that Intel is supporting Feminist Frequency/Anita Sarkeesian. Or they are bandwagon jumpers that "signal boost" whatever flavor of the week others deem important to talk about since they're all mindless drones. These GamerGaters feel "betrayed" by Intel. Remember that Intel was GG's first uh... "victory" when they started their stupid little spam email campaign. Intel won the hearts of so many little misogynists that day. That is until Intel realized how stupid that was and quickly reinstated their ads with Gamasutra. So yeah, they may bring up points that people could be concerned about, but none of them actually give a shit about any of that. They are just mad because they see Intel's move as an attack on GG and their narrow-minded view of the world.

    • Thortok2000
      #3
      Thortok2000 commented
      Editing a comment
      I definitely like the 'encourage them to apply' option rather than the 'force the companies to hire them' option. Ideas like that make me feel better about how money might be spent.

    • K-16
      #4
      K-16 commented
      Editing a comment
      Why is the GamerGate community complaining about this? Why is the GamerGate hashtag being used here? I thought they tried to clarify that GamerGate has nothing to do with misogyny, and everything to do with ethical issues in gaming journalism? How is this relevant to them? GAAAAAH... GamerGate confuses me! I can't keep up with what their current focus is...

    • Shawn Zipay
      #5
      Shawn Zipay commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by K-16
      Why is the GamerGate community complaining about this? Why is the GamerGate hashtag being used here? I thought they tried to clarify that GamerGate has nothing to do with misogyny, and everything to do with ethical issues in gaming journalism? How is this relevant to them? GAAAAAH... GamerGate confuses me! I can't keep up with what their current focus is...
      GamerGate dropped any and all false pretenses a while ago. Nobody believed them then when they lied about being about ethics. Nobody sure as hell believes them now when they say that, so many of them have largely just stopped saying it since it was bullshit to begin with.

    • K-16
      #6
      K-16 commented
      Editing a comment
      So the community basically admitted they're rebelling without a cause, yet the internet chooses to keep this alive because they think it's justified for various conflicting reasons? Damn we're stupid! I remember Chatterbox on GTA3 making fun of protests without a cause, but I'm insulted to see that such a parody has ended up being very real now.

      And as for Intel running this campaign, I see this as either people will accuse the entire industry of inequality, or accuse any company taking the first step as being a publicity stunt. So... Which is the lesser evil? I'll take publicity stunt (if it even counts as one), because at least the result did offer some progress towards equality. I mean seriously internet, if nothing makes you satisfied then please stop being an armchair activist and turn off the computer. (I would be an [idiotic and naive] armchair intellectual, so don't mind me. I don't have an agenda.)
      Last edited by K-16; 01-11-2015, 07:51 PM.
    Posting comments is disabled for guests. Login or sign up to leave a comment.

Related Topics

Collapse

TGN on Threads TGN on BlueSky TGN on Facebook
Working...