Valve Issues Statement About the New York Attorney General's Loot Box Focused Lawsuit

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • Valve Issues Statement About the New York Attorney General's Loot Box Focused Lawsuit

    Valve is "disappointed" by this lawsuit.
    The text logo for the game company Valve, featuring black text outlined in a red block.

    Valve, in an extraordinarily bizarre move, just released a public statement in which they voice their "disappointment" over a recent lawsuit filed against them. Of the four lawsuits Valve is currently facing, the Steam developer took a moment to publicly rebuke several of the claims levied against them from New York Attorney General (NYAG) Letitia James.

    James filed a lawsuit against Valve on February 25, 2026 over the loot boxes sold by Valve through their games and through Steam. James claims that the loot boxes violate the New York state constitution and penal law. James also accuses Valve of "promoting illegal gambling and threatening to addict children through its use of 'loot boxes'."

    Valve's statement today is directed at customers in New York that play games such as Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and Team Fortress 2. In their lengthy statement, Valve says that they "do not believe" that the "mystery boxes" in some of their games violate New York Gambling laws. Valve continues on to say that they are "disappointed to see the NYAG make that claim after working to educate them about our virtual items and mystery boxes." Valve says that they have been working with the NYAG since early 2023.

    The full statement covers a wide breadth of areas from baseball cards, Labubu, how Valve has been actively working for years to combat third-party gambling, and more. I will include their full statement below so you can judge for yourself.

    About the New York Attorney General lawsuit against Valve

    Dear New York customers of Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and Team Fortress 2:

    You may have seen the New York Attorney General recently filed a lawsuit against Valve claiming mystery boxes (like crates, cases, and chests) in some of our games violate New York gambling laws. We don't believe that they do, and were disappointed to see the NYAG make that claim after working to educate them about our virtual items and mystery boxes since they first reached out to us in early 2023. We rarely talk about litigation, but we felt we should explain the situation to you.

    We shared with the NYAG that these types of boxes in our games are widely used, not just in video games but in the tangible world as well, where generations have grown up opening baseball card packs and blind boxes and bags, and then trading and selling the items they receive. On the physical side, popular products used in this way include baseball cards, Pokemon, Magic the Gathering, and Labubu. In the game space, digital packs similar to our boxes date back to 2004 and are in widespread use. Players don't have to open mystery boxes to play Valve games. In fact, most of you don't open any boxes at all and just play the games—because the items in the boxes are purely cosmetic, there is no disadvantage to a player not spending money.

    In the process of cooperating with the NYAG’s investigation, we shared with them our efforts over many years to shut down accounts found to be using Valve game items on gambling sites in violation of the Steam Subscriber Agreement. We also shared with them our efforts to combat fraud and theft of users’ items and our extraordinary measures to stop gambling sites from taking advantage of Steam accounts and Valve game items. Valve does not cooperate with gambling sites. To date we've locked over one million Steam accounts that were being misused by third parties in connection with gambling, fraud, and theft. We’ve also shipped features (like trade reversal and trade cooldown) to discourage gambling sites’ ability to operate and protect Steam users from fraud. And we forbid any gambling-related business to participate in or sponsor tournaments for our games.

    We have serious concerns with many of the alterations the NYAG claims are necessary to make to our games. First, the NYAG seems to believe boxes and their contents should not be transferable. They appear to assume digital mystery boxes and items in our games are different from tangible items like baseball card packs (which contain random cards), and to take issue with the fact that users have the ability to transfer the items they receive through Steam Trading or user-to-user sales on the Community Market. We think the transferability of a digital game item is good for consumers—it gives a user the ability to sell or trade an old or unwanted item for something else, in the same way an owner can sell or trade a tangible item like a Pokemon or baseball card. NYAG proposes to take away users’ ability to transfer their digital items from Valve games. Transferability is a right we believe should not be taken away, and we refuse to do that.

    The NYAG also proposed to gather additional information (beyond what we normally collect in the course of processing payments) about each game user on the off-chance someone in New York was anonymizing their location to appear outside of New York, such as by using a VPN. This would have involved implementing invasive technologies for every user worldwide. Similarly, the NYAG demanded that Valve collect more personal data about our users to do additional age verification—even though most payment methods used by New York Steam users already have age verification built-in. Valve knows our users care about the security of their personal information, and we believe it’s in our and their interest to only collect the information necessary to operate the business and comply with law.

    We respect New York's right to determine the laws governing behavior in the state. We will of course comply if the New York legislature passes laws governing mystery boxes—something it has not done despite considering the issue a few times. Such laws would be the result of a public process, presumably with input from the industry and New York gamers. The type of commitments the NYAG demanded from Valve went far beyond what existing New York law requires and even beyond New York itself. It may have been easier and cheaper for Valve to make a deal with the NYAG, but we believed the type of deal that would satisfy the NYAG would have been bad for users and other game developers, and impacted our ability to innovate in game design.

    In addition, although this case is about mystery boxes, we feel the need to address comments made by the NYAG about games, real world violence, and children. Those extraneous comments are a distraction and a mischaracterization we’ve all heard before. Numerous studies throughout the years have concluded there is no link between media (movies, TV, books, comics, music, and games) and real world violence. Indeed, many studies highlight the beneficial impact of games to users.

    Ultimately, a court will decide whose position—ours or NYAG's—is correct. In the meantime, we wanted to make sure you were aware of the potential impact to users in New York and elsewhere.

    -March 11, 2026

    • K-16
      #1
      K-16 commented
      Editing a comment
      Shouldn't they uh........ Keep that to themselves to build a defense without letting the opposition know what cards you hold? Talking during lawsuits is........................Bad for your case.

      I wonder what Coffeezilla thinks about this.

    • azalea
      #2
      azalea commented
      Editing a comment
      It was already completely obvious what arguments they could use. it's not giving anything away at all, and the parts about privacy are good PR.

    • K-16
      #3
      K-16 commented
      Editing a comment
      Hmm... All right.
    Posting comments is disabled for guests. Login or sign up to leave a comment.

Related Topics

Collapse

  • Shawn Zipay
    Valve Says 'People Enjoy Surprises', Claims Counter-Strike 2 Loot Boxes are Fine Actually
    by Shawn Zipay
    Surprise!

    Valve is still being sued by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The lawsuit, filed in February 2026, accuses Valve of "promoting illegal gambling and threatening to addict children through its use of 'loot boxes'." James and the state of New York is seeking "full restitution" for players, claiming that "loot boxes pose the same dangers as casino gambling, especially for children."

    Valve already issued one response to this...
    05-20-2026, 07:30 PM
  • Shawn Zipay
    Another Class-Action Lawsuit Filed Against Valve Over Loot Box 'Gambling'
    by Shawn Zipay
    Valve is accused of running an illegal gambling operation.

    On Monday, March 9, 2026, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against Valve. The lawsuit says that Valve has been knowingly operating an illegal gambling operation through their loot box system integrated that has been integrated into several titles available through Steam.

    This is a class-action lawsuit led by the Hagens Berman firm. Steve Berman, founder and...
    03-09-2026, 07:39 PM
  • Shawn Zipay
    Former Gearbox Lawyer Claims CEO Randy Pitchford Took Secret $12 Million Bonus in Lawsuit Gearbox Claims is 'Absurd'
    by Shawn Zipay

    Buckle up, everyone, because this is going to be a real doozy of a news post.

    There are two lawsuits recently filed between Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford and the former general counsel for Gearbox. They're both suing each other, both claiming the other were in violation of their legal responsibilities to the company. The lawsuit against Pitchford from the former Gearbox lawyer Wade Callender says that Pitchford received a secret $12 million bonus from Take-Two Interactive.

    Callender's lawsuit, filed December 21, 2018, also says that Pitchford is in violation of some contracts that involve Gearbox and a "separate real estate company" that both of them owned. Gearbox says that these accusations are "absurd" in a brief statement released today by a Gearbox spokesperson. ...
    01-11-2019, 04:06 PM
  • Shawn Zipay
    EA Facing Lawsuit in Canada Over Loot Boxes
    by Shawn Zipay
    Two plaintiffs are seeking damages over "unlicensed, illegal gaming system."

    Electronic Arts is facing a class action lawsuit in Canada that concerns the implementation and use of loot boxes in over 60 titles. The lawsuit was filed in Canada on September 30 by two plaintiffs, Mark Sutherland and Shawn Moore.

    The lawsuit was first discovered by The Patch Notes, an esports law blog. They break down the lawsuit in fairly simple terms for us. In short, the lawsuit...
    10-21-2020, 01:07 PM
  • Loading...
  • No more items.
TGN on Threads TGN on BlueSky TGN on Facebook
Working...