Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

[MooneyBravo]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

how is it fair that any noob pilot can kill any expert pilot if they end up behind them by luck, its not the same with any other kit or vehicle in the game... it ruins the whole point of being a good pilot.

How is it fair that any 'noob' can C4 any expert tank driver if they end up near them by luck?

[Hu.Z_of_PLA]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

Yes because I'm sure in a game with no radar you can keep track of exactly where every enemy plane is and they are never ever going to end up heading towards you by luck, they dont even have to be CLOSE behind you to shoot you down.

do you even know how real life radar works? you don't get little blip about who's on your side, in RL radar only illuminate the front.

I posted my score so you can see AA is still the underdog. I can just fly up, sweep down, and kill the little guy in AA, who can't even move.

[XmetallicaXguitarstX]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

you don't get behind someone "by luck", you get there by situational awareness, outmanuvering someone

exactly, although i do not support the A2A missles being as accurate as they are.

[MackTheKnifeAU]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

A2A needs to be brought back to almost the same level it used to be, how is it fair that any noob pilot can kill any expert pilot if they end up behind them by luck, its not the same with any other kit or vehicle in the game... it ruins the whole point of being a good pilot.

Hmmn, another planewhore nerfed because he can't adapt.

Since when wasnt luck part of combat. Tonnes of examples (IRL, in game whatever) where luck determines many things, a obsolete serbian SAM squad shot down a F-117 stealth fighter from good training, innovation, and a little luck.

how is it fair that any noob pilot can kill any expert pilot if they end up behind them by luck, its not the same with any other kit or vehicle in the game

I guess you don't use armour much? Or infantry, or helos?

ANY kit\vehicle can lose by luck, if a tank gets behind another tank, it's probably gameover, if a Helo gets behind another helo, it's usually shot down, if I end up behind a squad of 2 or 3, with most kits I could take them down.

You are obviously one of those "planes should be invincible and unkillable" people. Adapt. or DIAF.

[saggyb]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

yeah, i since when is AA not going to threate na pilot in real-life, i mean really, if anything its become more realistic, originally you could just slightly move and the AA misslie would miss, now it is real, it keeps the noobs out of the sky.

Why are you talking about realism in BF2? If it was realistic a single bullet would be able to incapacitate any enemy, or a single rocket would take a tank out of action, oh and lets not forget how anyone can be saved with the shock paddles. Perfect realism should not be the goal of this game, balanced and fair gameplay should be. Right now A2A combat is not balanced or fair, do you know how many people would be complaining if tank vs tank combat was made to be like A2A is now? Of course most people here don't mind because the majority of them don't fly, its just like people complaining about the overpowered kits/guns (the ones they don't use) and about how the one they use needs to be improved.

[MooneyBravo]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

do you know how many people would be complaining if tank vs tank combat was made to be like A2A is now?

What?! Tank vs. tank has ALWAYS been the one who lands the first shot is the one who wins(in a scenario where they have the same health). It was even worse in BF1942 since you could kill tanks with one hit to the back.

[saggyb]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

ANY kit\vehicle can lose by luck, if a tank gets behind another tank, it's probably gameover, if a Helo gets behind another helo, it's usually shot down, if I end up behind a squad of 2 or 3, with most kits I could take them down.

This is not true, a tank driver with real skill can easily take on a tank even when he doesn't get the first hit in, there are no vehicles that are as easy to take out the same vehicle as planes currently are. It's "oh look theres a jet thats already used his flares, click, yay I win".

[zacman13245]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

Why are you talking about realism in BF2? If it was realistic a single bullet would be able to incapacitate any enemy, or a single rocket would take a tank out of action, oh and lets not forget how anyone can be saved with the shock paddles. Perfect realism should not be the goal of this game, balanced and fair gameplay should be. Right now A2A combat is not balanced or fair, do you know how many people would be complaining if tank vs tank combat was made to be like A2A is now? Of course most people here don't mind because the majority of them don't fly, its just like people complaining about the overpowered kits/guns (the ones they don't use) and about how the one they use needs to be improved.

yeah i understand that, but i mean in the sky, people are saying on how its ruined the air battles. if anything you will become a better pilot because of it

[HABO3]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

I love reading that planewhore guys posts ranting and bitching about how he can't rape flags anymore, I'm laughing so ****ing hard, **** I love this patch.

[Alcorr]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

This is not true, a tank driver with real skill can easily take on a tank even when he doesn't get the first hit in, there are no vehicles that are as easy to take out the same vehicle as planes currently are. It's "oh look theres a jet thats already used his flares, click, yay I win".

Exactly...and to the tank argument...if it was made same as AA then the tow would kill in one hit, would auto lock and you would always get a free kill....lol what a joke....this patch is crap...the worst patchi have ever seen for any game ever.

[Alcorr]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

I love reading that planewhore guys posts ranting and bitching about how he can't rape flags anymore, I'm laughing so ****ing hard, **** I love this patch.

I laugh at people like you who have no skill and have no sense for game balance or logic...only the whiners that love to complain because the game actually takes skill...lol

[HABO3]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

lemme get my violin out...

[Hu.Z_of_PLA]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

Exactly...and to the tank argument...if it was made same as AA then the tow would kill in one hit, would auto lock and you would always get a free kill....lol what a joke....this patch is crap...the worst patchi have ever seen for any game ever.

one difference: the tank is going to stick in your sight for 5 seconds least, but the jet can be gone in 0.5 seconds.

[XmetallicaXguitarstX]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

Why are you talking about realism in BF2? If it was realistic a single bullet would be able to incapacitate any enemy, or a single rocket would take a tank out of action, oh and lets not forget how anyone can be saved with the shock paddles. Perfect realism should not be the goal of this game, balanced and fair gameplay should be. Right now A2A combat is not balanced or fair, do you know how many people would be complaining if tank vs tank combat was made to be like A2A is now? Of course most people here don't mind because the majority of them don't fly, its just like people complaining about the overpowered kits/guns (the ones they don't use) and about how the one they use needs to be improved.

YES! WHY do people insist on BF2 being REAL! This is NOT a SIM!

I don't mind either way, but my god.... don't whine like little bitches until you get your way.. HONESTLY.

This is turning into halo 2 on xbox live... (people complained about a bunch of things, the battle rifle mainly, and they did the same ****.... went in to "fix" the BR, made it REALLY powerful, and weakened every other weapon. people whined that the BR is "PRO" [even though it is a 1 SHOT KILL to the head, while the smg takes like 10 secs. to kill, but yet when people use it and kill somone, they suck..?])

These people are the same people that make up names, like, "noob", "bunnyhopper", "noobtuber"..... etc. They have such elitist atitudes and think nothing can touch them, therefore the person that killed them must have used a "cheap" (valid, and smart...) tactic... and then they make up names for them.

I just love it how the people that use those words, say that THE VERY PERSON THAT KILLED THEM... is a "noob"... (wtf right?)

I kind of got off on a tangent, but these are the same people that complain and make a game shitty.





EDIT: To anyone that 100% agrees give a big "HELL YEAH!"

[saggyb]

Re: Where are you |CCC|Planewhore?

yeah i understand that, but i mean in the sky, people are saying on how its ruined the air battles. if anything you will become a better pilot because of it

Yea and if they made it so that a tank kills another tank in one shot everytime and it only took one bullet to kill you, good players would probably become better for it, but theres no need to make it so extreme.

To all you idiots calling me planewhores, I spend maybe 1/10th of the time I play in a plane, it's not a big part of my game, but I would be just as upset if they made this kind of change to any of the other vehicles just cuz of whiners.

Yes planes were overpowered, but it did not take turning missiles into magic rockets to fix it, all they needed to do was make minor adjustments to missiles so that it was POSSIBLE to kill jets if you were skilled enough, not effortless, no one ever complains about the expert tank drivers that run up 50:1 KD ratios, so why pilots? Just cuz you don't like to/can't fly?