Hate BF2 1.2

[nobodyhsthsnmyt]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

http://media.putfile.com/AAmissiles

W H A T E V E R

have fun playing your panzied out cry baby game... i know i'll be lookin for something else

P.S. this WAS a great game, i truely enjoyed many aspects of it, but this is the straw... never again. no way...

[WarGimp]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

http://media.putfile.com/AAmissiles

W H A T E V E R

have fun playing your panzied out cry baby game... i know i'll be lookin for something else

P.S. this WAS a great game, i truely enjoyed many aspects of it, but this is the straw... never again. no way...

Wow... um, dude I sure as hell wouldn't be calling people cry babies while you're taking your ball and going home. Er, you don't even have a ball to take.

That vid shows a fighter locking onto an enemy who didn't manuver, didn't drop flares, and did about the most predictable manouver possible. Still, it took 4 missiles to put him down.

Yer not seriously crying foul over that?
Jeezuz.

[jonnysanchez]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

it looked like it took 3 missiles to kill him. i saaw at least 3 missiles explode in that clip

[claevade]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Anyone thought about flying high and use diveattacks to take out groundtargets? Just tested, if you fly above 300 feet the AA's don't stand a change, you can dive on anything and pull up and head of after.

Did you really think the planes usually fly at 100 feet? I think the change is big, but it does improve the gameplay, at least on the long turn. The better pilots will remain.

[WarGimp]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Yeah, excuse me... 5 missiles fired while there was a lock, reasonably good angle, no flares.

That target had vetoed his right to life.

[Lugal317]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Wow... um, dude I sure as hell wouldn't be calling people cry babies while you're taking your ball and going home. Er, you don't even have a ball to take.

That vid shows a fighter locking onto an enemy who didn't manuver, didn't drop flares, and did about the most predictable manouver possible. Still, it took 4 missiles to put him down.

Yer not seriously crying foul over that?
Jeezuz.

I was flying the jet that took the video... I cut it down to show you the important part. He had already used his flares, thought he had lost me.. when that happened. And it takes 3 to take them down 3 AA's, 3 missiles from planes. All do about 7hp damage.

[Chris_Redfield]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Wargimp you are ****ing nuts. That video shows that it takes zero effort to use the missiles. Thats the point. Reasonable angle? HAH.

[Lugal317]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Yeah, excuse me... 5 missiles fired while there was a lock, reasonably good angle, no flares.

That target had vetoed his right to life.

Dude that was not a "reasonably good angle" it was fast and tight... You have to admit in the best circumstances ONE of those might hit... Now they ALL hit.

P.S. I love how the rockets come out limpwristed like now....

[maranello]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Why do you say "just hover hover dont move" in the video?:)

[Lugal317]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Wargimp... if that is your BF2 name... you have ALMOST 2hrs in an airplane, how can you say you know about angles and such???

[Lugal317]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Why do you say "just hover hover dont move" in the video?:)

Thats my buddy testing something else in the helicopter (we were multitasking the bunch of us)

[nobodyhsthsnmyt]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

thats right... you need NO SKILL whatsoever to take down enemy planes.

that j-10 is pulling his hardest turn to the right, missile spam spam spam, guaranteed frag. and btw its 2 missiles that hit him, just the smoke coming off making it look like hes being hit more than twice. anyway, im not up for discussion with any of you, especially you warwimp.

once more.. HAVE FUN playing your fluffy pink game, all you have to do is point and click, i hope your happy now

[maranello]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Wargimp... if that is your BF2 name... you have ALMOST 2hrs in an airplane, how can you say you know about angles and such???

I have 43 hours in the airplane, almost 3700 kills with 4.41 k:d ratio. I agree with him. The angle does not matter, the modern missiles will never lock on the tail of the aircraft, they will lock on the middle of it. Actually let me put it this way, they will lock on almost the nose of the aircraft, but in an angle like that, they will hit from the middle.

That's how they are designed. I did read a lot abou Air-to-Air missiles when i was learning Falcon AF. When you are approaching to another aircraft and shoot your missiles, missiles NEVER try to hit the aircraft from its tail, they always aim for the nose and hit from the middile, they always try to be one step ahead.

[Paas]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Wargimp... if that is your BF2 name... you have ALMOST 2hrs in an airplane, how can you say you know about angles and such???

Your elitist attitude shows right through. I probably don't have many hours in an Airplane myself, but, I know about angles.

I just refuse to stand there and wait with three other people for "One" jet that I will probably be TKed for anyways.

{WP}Paas

[WarGimp]

Re: Hate BF2 1.2

Dude that was not a "reasonably good angle" it was fast and tight... You have to admit in the best circumstances ONE of those might hit... Now they ALL hit.

P.S. I love how the rockets come out limpwristed like now....

Ok, the angle wasn't great, but he didn't manuver at all. You launched 5 missiles post lock. 3 missile hits is actually 1 more than I expected planes to take.

That means AA emplacements cannot take you out in one pass, either. They're definatly a bigger threat, but they have to lock, fire, reload, relock, repeat.

Good job on getting your prey to drop his flares early. That's the way ya should do it. Can you go do some more air to air hunting and string us together a more in-depth dogfighting vid?