The friendly HC or SC poll!

[CptainCrunch]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

When does health auto regenerate kick in?

Crunch

[iQue]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

On average, on SC if you were to add up total bullets fired at a target and number of targets killed it would still average out to like 6-7+

No because at medium distances (eg not from one end of Countdown to another) you will kill someone with as most 5 bullets even if you just hit their leg. Assuming you use an AR without stopping power.

Check the ECP for proof.

[Kodakk]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

There's a tremendous difference between HC and SC. I've scrimmed in both, and in HC people can basically pistol spam you through smoke and get a kill - which is extremely cheap. The same can't be said for SC - you actually have to know what you're shooting at, and if you should shoot (risk giving your position) away. The thing is HC doesn't reward careful aiming which is why it appeals to a wider group of players.

[jackal22]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

^ No offence but that's a stupid argument, I don't doubt you can kill someone in 4 shots, 2 with a sniper but can you so that every single time without fail? hell no, no one can on SC which is the point.

On average, on SC if you were to add up total bullets fired at a target and number of targets killed it would still average out to like 6-7+

On HC it would only average out to 3-4+

(both cases assume you have good equal reflexes and aim)

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

You're doing it wrong, because I kill people with 4 shots in SC. Perhaps it's time for you to practice properly in order to improve?

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

:laugh:

Dysplasia- the minimum number of maximum rounds you need to hit to kill someone, would be 5. Thats 5 shots by 20HP. If they have Juggernaut, the counter goes up by one.

Oh, well I didn't no that you did it like that, I thought you were just naming a number off the top of your head. >_>

<_<

>_>

<_<

:0

[RYKUU]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

Soft core, because i like to have a chance when i play.

and guys please get off the topic of the 2 girls one cup its feral.

[Chris_Redfield]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

Uh oh, time for me to buckle my seatbelt

:laugh:

Dysplasia- the minimum number of maximum rounds you need to hit to kill someone, would be 5. Thats 5 shots by 20HP. If they have Juggernaut, the counter goes up by one.

So if you need 10 shots to kill someone, then its your own fault, hence me pointing out the obvious flaw in your complaints. Dont blame SC for your own lack of skill. Want to hit and kill people with just 1 shot? SP that M40 and learn dragshots.

[Keyelite]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

Uh oh, time for me to buckle my seatbelt

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

Truly classic, someone moaning about his own lack of skills.

I'm not moaning, Jesus, I'm pointing out that it takes about ten bullets to take someone down, that's not moaning now is it?

Perhaps you're just insecure about your own lack of skill in SC?




:0

[Chris_Redfield]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

Five bullets my eggs, I have to unload at least 10 into someone unless at close range.

Truly classic, someone moaning about his own lack of skills.

As for the whole "reality" contest, you missed the point again.

SC was never meant to be realistic, so why come up with that argument? HC may be more realistic than SC, but compared to the other, realism-oriented games, HC is just as good as SC. OR just as bad.

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

Five bullets my eggs, I have to unload at least 10 into someone unless at close range.

[Spik3d]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

Well it's more realistic than having to unload a whole magazine into someone just to kill them.

And I always have to put at least 3 rounds into someone to take them down, it's not one shot one kill unless you're using a sniper rifle... Pay more attention.

:shakehead:

...Even the full magazine so many of the hardcore players whine about needing to kill one person is very over exaggerated, four rounds max from an assault rifle are needed to kill somebody (excluding the bugged AK47 with reflex sight and suppressor). Even the weapon that does the least possible damage per round (pistol) can down somebody (without juggernaut) with five shots maximum if you do not hit the the head modifier (there are no other modifiers for the pistol, pistol head modifier is 1.4x)...

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

Yes, truly realistic that some dude will take a 5.56 to the chest, but *I'm* the one who's going to DIE by way of a shot to the foot. I've never forgiven HC for this glaring stupidity, and I don't intend to do so now either. It would've been more realistic to diminish the player's accuracy and/or mobility for limb shots, but hey... what the f*ck do I know, right?

Well it's more realistic than having to unload a whole magazine into someone just to kill them.

And I always have to put at least 3 rounds into someone to take them down, it's not one shot one kill unless you're using a sniper rifle... Pay more attention.

[Chris_Redfield]

Re: The friendly HC or SC poll!

Camping isnt a bad trait, however. And its nowhere near as bad in COD4. Maps are generally fairly open and you get to approach the camper, or flush him out, using various different routes. Just feel lucky and fortunate, that COD4 isnt suffering from the "eye shots" development "oops". In SWAT4, the bullets dont fly from the hip, like in BF2, they fly from the eye level, which makes for some awful camping abilities.

And HC has a lot more camping than SC does, a lot more.