"Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

[LoganX]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

Yea well you've assumed poorly grasshopper. In the military they stress attention to detail and this is something the civilian sector, yourself included miserably lack sometimes. Refer to the 1st page of this thread and then allow yourself to rephrase.

Uhmmm...did you not post this?

i hope it provides lots of close quarters combat with as little vehicle disruption as possible.....

To me and everyone else it looks like you're whining about vehicles.
That you want a pure infantry map.
If that's not what you meant then please clarify.

And then there's this one also from the first page:

it better a really good urban city map, like karkand. all the maps we r getting in all the new games seem to be tank battles or air battles. i want a large, confined city, like karkand or mushtur

[RangerXML]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

Karkand with Insurgent forces (classic RPGs), nuff said

[solofowaffles]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

my vision of this map is a the us team must advance upon a road to capture the city of jalabad which is defende by mec forces.

[solofowaffles]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

yeah i know but wat other scenarios could there be.

[MrKLM]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

i hope the map is a mix of like mash/zatar/sharqi with a bit of dalian in there.. kinda like Jibbel City Map jibbel city is what more bf2 maps need to be like.

[LoganX]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

My reference to that was to AlphaCueUp's post not yours.
But i get your point.

[12:oc7ock]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

My reference to that was to AlphaCueUp's post not yours.
But i get your point.

O, in that case I retracted my last post, my bad.

[AlphaCueUp]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

Sooo you only like the kinds of vehicles that don't shoot. :hmm:
You like using vehicle to get from Point A to point B but you don't like that they can kill people.
So basically you don't like the majority of vehicles in BF2. So why are you playing?

(Yes I'm generalizing your statement because I'm tired of all the Anti-vehicle people whining about vehicles in a game that was made to be vehicle centric.

I've heard rumor of the infantry only setting coming in the next patch also.
This could be great for both sides of this.
The people who want infantry only can get their wish AND the people who can't stand the anti-vehicle whiners will be rid of them.
It's a WIN WIN solution.

ive made no indication as to what i dont like, or what i 'only like', amazing how you none-the-less still arrive at that conclusion...i simply stated i would like a map geared towards infantry, anything else you said is purely from YOU....

also, i love how people in this thread love to whine about people who allegedly whine......you are the whiners you hate so much, i havent made a single whine about a single thing....

i havent said i dont like anything, i have only stated my opinion of what type of play i would enjoy seeing in the new map...

before you put words into my mouth, and label me, i suggest you use what little intellect you can muster up, and read what i posted, not whats in your head....

[LoganX]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

You posted that you want as little vehicles as possible or none.
What else am I (and others) supposed to surmise except that you don't like vehicles.
There are enough of anti-vehicle people out there who gripe about how they hate how vehicle are ruining BF2.
If you don't want to get grouped together with them then I suggest you think before you post.

[solofowaffles]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

its funny,if u dont like vehicles there is this special class called ANTITANK.

[Revoluti0n]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

I think it's hilarious how people want BF2 to be like MOH or even CSS. BF2 has vehicles in it for a reason. If you dont like getting your ass kicked by tanks or APC's, the learn to use the AT kit, if that is too much to ask then try jumping in a tank yourself and tearing it up. This incessant b!tching about "Vehicles are ruining my gameplay experience" by some has about gotten on everyone's last nerve.

i hope it provides lots of close quarters combat with as little vehicle disruption as possible.....

I wonder if the "Infantry Only" game mode is a reality?

[sarb]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

would be cool if they have like some sort of main road with a spawn point called Convoy or something, where it could just be a lot of blow up hummers and stuff, like the US coming in with a convoy, and MEC taking it out.

[solofowaffles]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

a diffrent scenario could be a us convoy is ambushed and the us and mec battle to find the wrekage as valuable intel is in there,as in the map a road with burnt out humvees and tanks and all that good stuff,the mec starts at 1 end and us at the other with flags thrown in intermintently.

[Vinyx]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

So are we officially getting a new free map with the next patch?

Yeap, read for yourself here at the 6/16/06 Community update.

http://www.ea.com/official/battlefield/battlefield2/us/editorial.jsp?src=communityupdate_061606

Some groups have noticed the testing of a new map "Road to Jalalabad" being run on our test servers. This map will be included in our next patch release and is not part of a new booster pack.

[Slocum]

Re: "Road to Jalalabad" Discussion

a diffrent scenario could be a us convoy is ambushed and the us and mec battle to find the wrekage as valuable intel is in there,as in the map a road with burnt out humvees and tanks and all that good stuff,the mec starts at 1 end and us at the other with flags thrown in intermintently.

Yeah that would be awesome. And once either side has captured the destroyed convoy area they are supplied with jeeps/tanks/apc to advance on through. So in the begining ppl could have their infantry only, and then later on you can also get some vehicle stuff in. 'cause without some vehicle stuff i think it gets too repative.