AT not used on armor

[Terroser]

Re: AT not used on armor

I understood, I just don't think you should consider yourself stupid when playing. :) I mean, there are those that can play this game extraordinarily well, but be completely stupid....*cough* those that can't help but complain about the game's weapons *cough* If you play "stupid", you could easily be the person that lacks the experience that some of the BF2 has, which is why I mentioned playing with smart people.

One example of a "smart" player or group is the following: you come in, and about 2mins later you are asked to join a squad; this means that they are having issues, and need help. They are playing "good", but could use help.

Another example: A pilot hovers by your head using the "Get in" and "Need backup" statements over and over again (i am referencing myself). this normally means he needs someone to play with him, as long as he can press his shoot button, he can do a good job.

I thank you for agreeing, as for your bad english, never you mind! :)...it's the thought that counts!

By the way, I don't consider me stupid.....
but you are tottaly right..
but some people don't understand the words :smart, reaction time(skills) and teamplay.

those 3 things make one of the best players on the field, and 5% luck :laugh:

[Wranger4400]

Re: AT not used on armor

I think it's a great fealing to tag infantry in the torso.

[testingtesting12]

Re: AT not used on armor

No its not, is so noob! It shows no skill whats so ever. I mean AT is for heavy amor, and noob tube is for light armor. Using it on infantry is as noob as the noob tubers.

So shoot them, what is the problem?

[F-1]

Re: AT not used on armor

Nothing is wrong with using the AT rocket against infantry. It is definitly not a lame techneque as the noob tubing. I suggest that you stop arguing about it! you can see the rocket coming so run and hide. if you run it wont hit you because it does not change direction instantly.

Next we will ask for downgrading the shotguns and then the assault rifles!

maybe we should just not use any weapon and move hand in hand and start singing together!

if you think "I saw you first then I should kill you" then you are wrong. just get used to it and learn how to dodge it or use it.

[machstem]

Re: AT not used on armor

Next we will ask for downgrading the shotguns and then the assault rifles!

maybe we should just not use any weapon and move hand in hand and start singing together!

if you think "I saw you first then I should kill you" then you are wrong. just get used to it and learn how to dodge it or use it.

This is what I was getting at. If enough people complain about one weapon that most people will and would never complain about, then it wouldn't changed, and people would adapt. These forums offer a catch-22 with the community: Great for offering patches, maps and support your community...on the other end, you get those with no real talent or intelligence playing the videogame, and in turn ruins it for those that get used to the so-called "problems"

I seriously think it would make these same people extremely happy to have every kit be completely invicible for them, and offer us bunnies as our bullets. Hell, even then, they would probably complain how we inherited the "hopping" from our bullets, and would ask to prevent us from jumping up and down. It would then become TEAM vs. STATIONARY TARGETS, in which they would probably still lose.

PEACE

[CS-Evolution]

Re: AT not used on armor

If you count the number of times the thread starter calls people "noob", it's pretty apparent that he doesn't really care about anything other than trolling it up.

IRT to the thread starter: You have no right to tell people how to play, so get off your high horse.

This forum still amazes me in the fact that there are people here even more immature than in the Steam Forums. I didn't think that was possible til I joined the BF2 community.

[machstem]

Re: AT not used on armor

If you count the number of times the thread starter calls people "noob", it's pretty apparent that he doesn't really care about anything other than trolling it up.

IRT to the thread starter: You have no right to tell people how to play, so get off your high horse.

This forum still amazes me in the fact that there are people here even more immature than in the Steam Forums. I didn't think that was possible til I joined the BF2 community.

I agree.

I started a "noob" poll in the Poll Section.

I just can't help but specifically mention why some people tend to be idiots when they write something.

If you amazed about the forum containing immature kids, you might want to stop visiting them! I only joined totalbf2.com because I was impressed with their integration and dedication to BF2, a great game.

The only other forums I normally visit are anandtech.com for technical issues, and really, everything else doesn't matter to me.

And, I'm a big fan of getting folks all riled up on forums, it's amazing how people act and can't write when in frustration over someone else's opinion.

PEACE

[Roger Smith]

Re: AT not used on armor

What annoys me is that people cant use pistol for long rang, or even close range, i mean get some skill and use bullets, there is no skill at shooting an AT at infantry.

it doesnt annoy me when people dont use thier pistol because i can kill them while they reload. get some tactics man, stop whineing

Im also starting this because all the noob tube bitchers will come back after the patch and bitch about the AT noobs.

just because something is whined about, doesnt mean the whining is warrented. the grenade launcher is part of the reason that someone would select assault, its purpose is to kill people and fast, if you dont like it, stay away from urban areas and keep a height advantage. if you dont like at tubers, screw off, theres nothing to whine about.

Using on Infantry only shows how sorry you are at taking down armor.

what does shooting a person with a missile have to do with ones skill at shooting a missile at a tank, tanks are larger and an easier target. so at vs infantry if anything means your better at anti armor.

the only problem i have with at vs infantry is that its a waist of missiles that are going to need ammo, the pistol works just as well if not better as an anti infantry weapon. but i still think its acceptable to use the at in that way, especially in desperate situations. all in all, this is not the type of thing that is, or ever will be a gameplay problem, the real problem is that the armored combat is dumbed down and under effective. ground vehicles and boats need quicker acceleration and higher speeds. people need stamina regeneration, tank tracks need to go out with at rounds and enginieers can repair them while in the tank, engineers mines are invisable to enemy untill a friendly enginier goes near them, then they aprear. these changes would make armored combat more skillful ingeneral.

[F-1]

Re: AT not used on armor

If you want to keep the experience of being in a forum enjoyable for you and everyone else then as a rule of thumb you should respect everyone else and every opinion. if you start flaming everyone or calling anyone noob/idiot or whatever then that is not a good sprotsmanship.

If I mention an idea and everyone tells me that my idea is not good then I will definitly stop arguing. You could either be wrong or talking to the wrong audience.

[Xurreal]

Re: AT not used on armor

Is it me or do the majority of players whining about something are spec ops players with Strike on Karkand as their most played map?

[Badboris_uk]

Re: AT not used on armor

Is it me or do the majority of players whining about something are spec ops players with Strike on Karkand as their most played map?

I have no problem with either noobtoob, c4 chucking or AT sniping - if thats what people are gonna do to win, you just have to learn to fight them at their weakest point. All these "noob" tactics usually involve running headlong into a situation, so why not just hang out in a squad, and kill the waves of lonewolves pouring at you? I always play in a unit of 3 and have never had any trouble with any of these "noob" things you while about. perhaps its time to get some friends?

[Drum]

Re: AT not used on armor

i gota poll set up here:

http://www.totalbf2.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52924

go check a box so we can look at what the majority of the community thinks

[ReU_Potamus]

Re: AT not used on armor

What annoys me is that people cant use pistol for long rang, or even close range, i mean get some skill and use bullets, there is no skill at shooting an AT at infantry.

dont think pistols were "intended" to be used at long range just as you say AT missles werent "intended" to shoot infantry with. well it looks like you found something you like, that wasnt intended, and others found something they like... live with it and move on.


heres a thought when the next "At nnoob" comes at you dodge to the side quickly whip out your knife and gut him. its that easy.

if they are at range... pull out the machine gun and kill them while they try to reload the missle cause they sure as hell aint gonna pull out any other weapon.

[Xurreal]

Re: AT not used on armor

I have no problem with either noobtoob, c4 chucking or AT sniping - if thats what people are gonna do to win, you just have to learn to fight them at their weakest point. All these "noob" tactics usually involve running headlong into a situation, so why not just hang out in a squad, and kill the waves of lonewolves pouring at you? I always play in a unit of 3 and have never had any trouble with any of these "noob" things you while about. perhaps its time to get some friends?

Since you quoted my post, which part of your reply was intended for me?

[Daz]

Re: AT not used on armor

It does suck, not as much as GL's but nobody you cant own if you use another gun.

Just sucks as you only see the damn rocket at the last second especially if you are camped aiming at things then you see it and get up but it still gets you.

Oh well around a quater of the players of this game are ****s what do you expect.