AT not used on armor

[tw1g]

Re: AT not used on armor

First of to the idiot who stated that a moving soldier is easier to hit than a moving apc needs help. Anyways why do people complain about "noob tube". Sure it's easy to use and get kills but isn't that what technology does for us? Don't we have technology to make life easier? Isn't that why we have computers and operating systems so we don't have to all learn coding to be able to run a computer and get use out of it? Same can be applied to weapons. It's easier to take out 3-5 guys with a nade than gunnig them. People that bitch about stupid **** cause unnecesary nerfs to a good game.

[tw1g]

Re: AT not used on armor

First of to the idiot who stated that a moving soldier is easier to hit than a moving apc needs help. Anyways why do people complain about "noob tube". Sure it's easy to use and get kills but isn't that what technology does for us? Don't we have technology to make life easier? Isn't that why we have computers and operating systems so we don't have to all learn coding to be able to run a computer and get use out of it? Same can be applied to weapons. It's easier to take out 3-5 guys with a nade than gunnig them rite? And thats what it was made for. It wasn't made so they have a chance to counter attack and they wouldn't stop making them because it's "cheap" or requires no skill to throw a nade into a group. People that bitch about stupid **** cause unnecesary nerfs to a good game.

[machstem]

Re: AT not used on armor

Wow..you guys are just sad...not all, but most that complain.

I have been playing this game since the demo, and I'm sure most of you have. I don't know what the big deal with any weapon is? As someone mentioned, the weapons are made to kill, how else can this be explained to you?

All this talk of people being "noobs" is REALLY getting old. I have said it, and will say it again: If someone kills me more than twice with the same weapon, and I can't do anything about it, I learn from my mistake and change the way I play. The point to a game like BF2, or any other shooter, is to kill the enemy: ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

If someone uses the GL on a weapon, and that's all he can use, then let him play with only that, and once he gets to a air dominated map, he won't do anything worth while. I don't know if most of you remember the beginning topics on how BF2's favorite maps were the smaller, infantry based maps. I remember saying this would ruin the franchise if EA/DICE decides to stick too much to infantry based games, and well, you guys are living proof.

You want something, you get it. It arrives, and then you complain on how easy it is to die...as someone else mentioned, by ANY WEAPON THEY GET KILLED BY.

Go play bust-a-move or a puzzle game if you don't like being killed. If not, then keep playing, and complain to EA/DICE about the things that matter, like the dominance of jets on any map with a good pilot, etc....actually, no, don't complain about that either, because then you will be forced to play any map with a bunch of "noob toobers"...seriously guys, play the game, get better, learn from your mistakes.

Someone is taking care of you? Rather than complain or call them noob tubes, learn from it, and either do it yourself or join a squad that can handle any problem. This game is not that difficult, the only ones that seem to have the most problems are those that can't play the game with intelligence, and therefore ruin it for the rest of us that CAN play well.

Just learn people. It's perfectly clear that most of you want an easy game to play, something that doesn't require a "skill" of sorts (I don't consider computer gaming skill). Personally, I like to be challenged while playing, and if it's a jet continuously bombing everything, some guy jumping like a rabbit with his grenade launcher, I learn, move on and win the map...by any means necessary.

PEACE

[Terroser]

Re: AT not used on armor

Wow..you guys are just sad...not all, but most that complain.

I have been playing this game since the demo, and I'm sure most of you have. I don't know what the big deal with any weapon is? As someone mentioned, the weapons are made to kill, how else can this be explained to you?

All this talk of people being "noobs" is REALLY getting old. I have said it, and will say it again: If someone kills me more than twice with the same weapon, and I can't do anything about it, I learn from my mistake and change the way I play. The point to a game like BF2, or any other shooter, is to kill the enemy: ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

If someone uses the GL on a weapon, and that's all he can use, then let him play with only that, and once he gets to a air dominated map, he won't do anything worth while. I don't know if most of you remember the beginning topics on how BF2's favorite maps were the smaller, infantry based maps. I remember saying this would ruin the franchise if EA/DICE decides to stick too much to infantry based games, and well, you guys are living proof.

You want something, you get it. It arrives, and then you complain on how easy it is to die...as someone else mentioned, by ANY WEAPON THEY GET KILLED BY.

Go play bust-a-move or a puzzle game if you don't like being killed. If not, then keep playing, and complain to EA/DICE about the things that matter, like the dominance of jets on any map with a good pilot, etc....actually, no, don't complain about that either, because then you will be forced to play any map with a bunch of "noob toobers"...seriously guys, play the game, get better, learn from your mistakes.

Someone is taking care of you? Rather than complain or call them noob tubes, learn from it, and either do it yourself or join a squad that can handle any problem. This game is not that difficult, the only ones that seem to have the most problems are those that can't play the game with intelligence, and therefore ruin it for the rest of us that CAN play well.

Just learn people. It's perfectly clear that most of you want an easy game to play, something that doesn't require a "skill" of sorts (I don't consider computer gaming skill). Personally, I like to be challenged while playing, and if it's a jet continuously bombing everything, some guy jumping like a rabbit with his grenade launcher, I learn, move on and win the map...by any means necessary.

PEACE

I'am with the stupid one :laugh:

[Auto-ER-]

Re: AT not used on armor

i just wanna make one correction.....c4 whoring people is just as bad noob tubing.... AT kills on people are just awesome...

Taking out six enemy with C4 > than "sniping" with AT round.

I personally couldn't give a rats ass, if I die from pistol, rifle, rocket, tank, I am still dead. I just find it amusingly ironic considering the rants and raves about GL's and C4 when this is just as cheap and "unintended", to use an excuse people like, as anything currently in the complaint pool. Funny enough, the solution everyone defending gave "just move" is the same for someone chucking C4, or tubers, you see them coming, you know what's about to happen.

[Jap1987]

Re: AT not used on armor

If you are referring to me as the idiot who stated a moving soldier is easier to hit than an apc then reread my post. I never said its easier to hit a soldier over an apc. All said was the speed the rocket turns and maneuvers is fast enough to hit an apc even if he is going perpendicular to your shot. And since an apc is much faster than a soldier strafing or running it is easy to hit them.

[Light_Wolf]

Re: AT not used on armor

Kill them, Taunt them, Teabag them for a while, end of story.

Thus.

[Jap1987]

Re: AT not used on armor

And yes you are right technology is made to make life easier and to give enemies less of a chance. But isnt it also true that if i jump and shoot a 40mm grenade at my feet i will also die not just the guy standing next to me. And you would also have to be alot further away to not be severly injured. Oh but good point though.

[machstem]

Re: AT not used on armor

I'am with the stupid one :laugh:

Well, it's one thing to be stupid while playing, not everyone is on the same level playing. If you play for fun, then you are the most intelligent player on the map, you can take that as a compliment. Play with smart people, and you will learn from them and only get better.

Some people, as proven by the point stats, do nothing but this game. They get used to a certain amount of points every match, and once they notice a decline because of some "new tactic" that people have been using from the start, they complain and don't adapt.

These things have been around since the beginning of the game, literally since it came out, and I still don't have a problem with the players that over-use the grenade launchers. I've never shot one, but I'm sure they have been used to kill infantry before. (in real life)

PEACE

[Terroser]

Re: AT not used on armor

Well, it's one thing to be stupid while playing, not everyone is on the same level playing. If you play for fun, then you are the most intelligent player on the map, you can take that as a compliment. Play with smart people, and you will learn from them and only get better.

Some people, as proven by the point stats, do nothing but this game. They get used to a certain amount of points every match, and once they notice a decline because of some "new tactic" that people have been using from the start, they complain and don't adapt.

These things have been around since the beginning of the game, literally since it came out, and I still don't have a problem with the players that over-use the grenade launchers. I've never shot one, but I'm sure they have been used to kill infantry before. (in real life)

PEACE

I mean, that I agreed with you

(Is it maby my bad english for jokes )

[AlphaNut]

Re: AT not used on armor

When and if i run as AT, i use my pistol for long ranges, noob

You look so sexy when you're upset darling :nod:

[deadman2312]

Re: AT not used on armor

I am so sick of hearing the word "nOOb"

Give me a fecking break already. I have been listening to people christen eachother with this name since the demo. How can one be a "nOOb" on a game that hadnt even been released yet, lmmfao.

Shooting someone with an AT rocket actually takes some aim, and maybe even some guidance, not even close to comparing with the motherf%^$ing GLs.

If anything you brought embarassment upon yourself by starting such a thread, like many here have said, IF YOU CANT DODGE A SLOW AT ROCKET YOU SUCK!!!!:laugh:

[18Zulukiller]

Re: AT not used on armor

Ive not actually realy seen this the whole useing AT missles at close range that much however it has happend to me on a couple of occassion. And as someone else stated it is possible that the AT guy was going for a tank and bumped into someone and then fired. If this is happening alot on a particular server aviod the server as that would anoy the hell out of me . But as for useing AT missles at a distance theres not a dam thing wrong with that and if youve got a problem with it your a pleb. The AT unit is the most handicapped unit in the game when it comes to medium to long ranges the SMG are usless the DOA-12 has a very short range. And as for useing the pistol your takeing the **** if you think anyone in there right mind is going to try take on someone with a G36C with a sodding pistol at a distance . You actually need locking up your mentally impaired and need to be locked up to keep the community save with crazy ideas like that . Nutters like that have watched way to many hollywood films were the good guy only has a pistol but hes still manges to kick everyone else arse thats running around with AK's and other fully auto weapons. As many people have stated already the AT missles are so easy to avoid they have a huge smoke trail move realy slow and have virtually no splash damage just side step them you slow wittted fools.

[machstem]

Re: AT not used on armor

I mean, that I agreed with you

(Is it maby my bad english for jokes )

I understood, I just don't think you should consider yourself stupid when playing. :) I mean, there are those that can play this game extraordinarily well, but be completely stupid....*cough* those that can't help but complain about the game's weapons *cough* If you play "stupid", you could easily be the person that lacks the experience that some of the BF2 has, which is why I mentioned playing with smart people.

One example of a "smart" player or group is the following: you come in, and about 2mins later you are asked to join a squad; this means that they are having issues, and need help. They are playing "good", but could use help.

Another example: A pilot hovers by your head using the "Get in" and "Need backup" statements over and over again (i am referencing myself). this normally means he needs someone to play with him, as long as he can press his shoot button, he can do a good job.

I thank you for agreeing, as for your bad english, never you mind! :)...it's the thought that counts!

[vbl]

Re: AT not used on armor

Very Well Said.
I agree 120%

(and I dont play the game all that much)

Exactly.