Re: Why many people are quitting BF2 for good -- it's not fun anymore
Those of you who make planes sound "invincible" are sadly mistaken. And i DO "get it". I've been flying for a while and i seen planes go down from the stupidest things. Planes are only "invincible" when the pilot is skilled. Do you have a problem with someone being so good that you can't kill him? I've seen people complain about this guy lingeringlead who is "invincible" while on foot and they all think he cheats (i'm talking 8-1 ratio in one game). No... he's just good at shooting and moving on foot. Tanks are "invincible" if you have a good driver and some supply boxes. Blackhawks are "invincible" if you have a skilled pilot, good gunners, and some engineers. What's similar here? If you have skills, you're harder to kill. What's wrong with that?
Now some of you want a weapon requiring less "skill" to be able to take down a plane. My question is, WHY? I took all those hours practicing on singleplayer just to get good at flying plane and chopper and now you want to just point and click and be able to shoot me down? That would be ruining the game for a lot of people who fly.
Some interesting observations:
1: MOST planes die from crashing into things (not deliberately ramming either). Especially true for new pilots.
2: Only when there's a skilled pilot around (on one side) do people on the ground notice and complain. Most of the time the planes in Oman or Wake AREN'T EVEN NOTICED.
3: If the AAs are so ineffective, why do people keep using them? They can be doing something helpf to their team like... capturing flags? Note that planes can't capture flags. A great way to get rid of enemy planes is to capture their airfield!
If you really need to "tweak" the air, my vote is to make it HARDER to fly. Make the plane have to land to rearm (have to make runways bigger though) and make the planes harder to aim (no brackets around stingers or jeeps).
Those of you who make planes sound "invincible" are sadly mistaken. And i DO "get it". I've been flying for a while and i seen planes go down from the stupidest things. Planes are only "invincible" when the pilot is skilled. Do you have a problem with someone being so good that you can't kill him? I've seen people complain about this guy lingeringlead who is "invincible" while on foot and they all think he cheats (i'm talking 8-1 ratio in one game). No... he's just good at shooting and moving on foot. Tanks are "invincible" if you have a good driver and some supply boxes. Blackhawks are "invincible" if you have a skilled pilot, good gunners, and some engineers. What's similar here? If you have skills, you're harder to kill. What's wrong with that?
Now some of you want a weapon requiring less "skill" to be able to take down a plane. My question is, WHY? I took all those hours practicing on singleplayer just to get good at flying plane and chopper and now you want to just point and click and be able to shoot me down? That would be ruining the game for a lot of people who fly.
Some interesting observations:
1: MOST planes die from crashing into things (not deliberately ramming either). Especially true for new pilots.
2: Only when there's a skilled pilot around (on one side) do people on the ground notice and complain. Most of the time the planes in Oman or Wake AREN'T EVEN NOTICED.
3: If the AAs are so ineffective, why do people keep using them? They can be doing something helpf to their team like... capturing flags? Note that planes can't capture flags. A great way to get rid of enemy planes is to capture their airfield!
If you really need to "tweak" the air, my vote is to make it HARDER to fly. Make the plane have to land to rearm (have to make runways bigger though) and make the planes harder to aim (no brackets around stingers or jeeps).
but i share and some people get narky about it!
Comment