We were hacked. Several times over the past two weeks, in fact.
While all passwords are encrypted and salted, it's recommended that you change your password here when you can.
As many have already stated, the AH-64 and MI-24 were built to fill different roles on the battlefield. Direct comparisons are pointless. Apples and oranges if you will. Just the throw another log on this fire, the attack helicopter is losing favor in American joint forces doctrine. The advent and constant improvement of precision munitions have undermined the Apache’s role. Why risk an aircraft and crew flying nape of the earth when the same effect can be achieved from 30,00 feet and miles away? While the Apaches does and will have a role in the Army for some time to come, one should remember that it was built to fight a massive tank battle in central Europe. Soviet air defense, primarily missiles, precluded the use of attack jets for this role. Things are now some what reversed. U.S. adversaries now typically use low tech, direct fire air defense systems, to which the AH-64 is much more venerable than, lets say a F-16. Any thoughts?
To the 12th guy, just because someone thinks that something american isnt the best, and has his opinion that the hind is better, doesn't mean he's anti american you great patriot.
You gained independance, so? You talk about that we were once the strongest country in the world you would sit if we told you to. Need I remind you about Vietnam, oh the war you never won but would like to claim. Sit down chavs!
You gained independance, so? You talk about that we were once the strongest country in the world you would sit if we told you to. Need I remind you about Vietnam, oh the war you never won but would like to claim. Sit down chavs!
Are you guys serious? I mean, are you actually arguing about nationalistic bullsh1t that neither of you had anything to do with?
They were designed for different missions. The apache is pure anti-tank, while the HIND was designed for transport as well as attack. IN the pure anti-tank realm... the AH-64 (All models) performs better than the Hind (personal opinion as well as a few different reviews, documentaries on various tv channels (History, military, Discovery chans).
As a transport helicopter... obviously the Hind performs better as the Apache only carries it's crew.
What are the specifications for this? Crash worthiness/crew survivability? performance? military role? weapons platforms? optics/scanners/radars?
Dont get me wrong... I think the Hind is an awsome helicopter, have gotten to see it a few times in airshows, with the russian troops in Bosnia/Kosovo, and here at the NTC, a few times, for training. I simply think that the Apache is a better platform.
THANK GOD FOR THIS INTELLIGENT POST... FINALLY SOMEONE SMART ON THESE FORUMS!
Little know fact on Apachies:
As a rule of thumb, for every 15 minutes of flight it requires 1 hour of ground service.
'Nother interesting one:
The main gun on the Apache was a feasco. During design, it was found that the barrel was too long and it caused the servos that move it to burn out in fairly short order. To fix this, they just cut down the barrel lenght. This caused it to be horribly inaccurate. To qualify the weapon system, all you had to do was hit a target at a certain distance (the exact number escapes me ATM). The rules didn't say how many shots you were allowed. So, they just kept on shooting until a bullet finally landed on the target and called it qualified. "Usless" was the term the people used who had to actually use the thing! Several re-fits later, and it's been improved, but it's still fans like a SOB.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment