Call of Duty 4 Skill

[SurgeY75]

Aerialz if your looking for high skiled server and dont mind playing unranked then go here.

85.236.100.210:28835
Standard Unlocks
No nades
Free for All

Very hectic but superb if you want to challenge yourself!
P.S iv also played with many members of this forum and im pretty sure not alot of them could get a 2:1 kdr on this server..

[Kodakk]

Heh, I hope they take nades out of TWL and other leagues.

Played a scrim yesterday, and the other team just spammed their nades at the start of a round.

And thanks Surgey, I'll check it out. Where's it located?

[Battl3fr0nt]

Alright,
This is not a bragging thread, simply an observation. I've played with many forum members, and I'm sure that every (almost ) forum contributer here is a great player.

But I've begun to notice something, and it might just be the change from Battlefield 2 to CoD4. Battlefield 2, I felt extremely good having a 2:1 kill to death ratio in a round, and that wasn't medic whoring. So yeah, I wasn't the one racking up the kills out there all the time, but at least I felt as though I was challenged.

That challenge, now I realize, was created not just by the players, but by the gameplay: ability for enemies to heal themselves, grenade spamming, etc. and not much of this is present in Call of Duty 4.

Basically, my point is, I find Call of Duty 4 to be much less of a challenge. Once again, it may just be the change from Battlefield 2 to CoD4, but it still makes me think. Of course now I've begun to play Search and Destroy and Headquarters, finding the skill level to be a bit increased.

An example: I have found myself time and time again outnumbered by the enemy, only to pick up one of their guns and kill them all after they spray like mindless, blind zombies. Now remember, I'm not bragging here, I'm simply saying that the skill level of most players in a server seems relatively low.

There always seems to be a few people in a server who just dominate, while the rest act as bullet sponges. I'm not 100% why I've come to this conclusion that the majority of Call of Duty (4) players are... less skilled. A final theory is that many of them are new to FPS's, getting the game for Christmas or a birthday. It may just be the opposite, that the leaders in a round are just "better", but I'm not convinced with that statement.

Because some rounds I can have a 3+:1 ratio, and other (few) rounds barely hold onto a 1:1 ratio, I can't be sure which it is.

What do you guys think?

I know what you mean.. I only know a few people that are at my lvl of skill... I am ranked 30 in cod4 tracker... and I have had a bad week but I am back on top of my game.. I have a 3:1 when im in the zone.. but my avg is 2.50:1.00

I do feel the same way about this tho.. there are not much good players out there.. just so weird cuz there are so much players you would think it would be better... but I end up owning the server 80% of the time...

[k-dawg]

It seems like most people play this as if it were Quake.. and not a military simulation game

[Kylee!]

It seems like most people play this as if it were Quake.. and not a military simulation game

Its definitely never was the latter thats for sure...

[imported_youm0nt]

Yup, Call of Duty 4 was not supposed to be realistic.