Alright,
This is not a bragging thread, simply an observation. I've played with many forum members, and I'm sure that every (almost
) forum contributer here is a great player.
But I've begun to notice something, and it might just be the change from Battlefield 2 to CoD4. Battlefield 2, I felt extremely good having a 2:1 kill to death ratio in a round, and that wasn't medic whoring. So yeah, I wasn't the one racking up the kills out there all the time, but at least I felt as though I was challenged.
That challenge, now I realize, was created not just by the players, but by the gameplay: ability for enemies to heal themselves, grenade spamming, etc. and not much of this is present in Call of Duty 4.
Basically, my point is, I find Call of Duty 4 to be much less of a challenge. Once again, it may just be the change from Battlefield 2 to CoD4, but it still makes me think. Of course now I've begun to play Search and Destroy and Headquarters, finding the skill level to be a bit increased.
An example: I have found myself time and time again outnumbered by the enemy, only to pick up one of their guns and kill them all after they spray like mindless, blind zombies. Now remember, I'm not bragging here, I'm simply saying that the skill level of most players in a server seems relatively low.
There always seems to be a few people in a server who just dominate, while the rest act as bullet sponges. I'm not 100% why I've come to this conclusion that the majority of Call of Duty (4) players are... less skilled. A final theory is that many of them are new to FPS's, getting the game for Christmas or a birthday. It may just be the opposite, that the leaders in a round are just "better", but I'm not convinced with that statement.
Because some rounds I can have a 3+:1 ratio, and other (few) rounds barely hold onto a 1:1 ratio, I can't be sure which it is.
What do you guys think?
This is not a bragging thread, simply an observation. I've played with many forum members, and I'm sure that every (almost
) forum contributer here is a great player. But I've begun to notice something, and it might just be the change from Battlefield 2 to CoD4. Battlefield 2, I felt extremely good having a 2:1 kill to death ratio in a round, and that wasn't medic whoring. So yeah, I wasn't the one racking up the kills out there all the time, but at least I felt as though I was challenged.
That challenge, now I realize, was created not just by the players, but by the gameplay: ability for enemies to heal themselves, grenade spamming, etc. and not much of this is present in Call of Duty 4.
Basically, my point is, I find Call of Duty 4 to be much less of a challenge. Once again, it may just be the change from Battlefield 2 to CoD4, but it still makes me think. Of course now I've begun to play Search and Destroy and Headquarters, finding the skill level to be a bit increased.
An example: I have found myself time and time again outnumbered by the enemy, only to pick up one of their guns and kill them all after they spray like mindless, blind zombies. Now remember, I'm not bragging here, I'm simply saying that the skill level of most players in a server seems relatively low.
There always seems to be a few people in a server who just dominate, while the rest act as bullet sponges. I'm not 100% why I've come to this conclusion that the majority of Call of Duty (4) players are... less skilled. A final theory is that many of them are new to FPS's, getting the game for Christmas or a birthday. It may just be the opposite, that the leaders in a round are just "better", but I'm not convinced with that statement.
Because some rounds I can have a 3+:1 ratio, and other (few) rounds barely hold onto a 1:1 ratio, I can't be sure which it is.
What do you guys think?
).I dont know but cod2 IMO was rly harded,I played cod2 for a year but i still couldnt call me skilled player,but now when cod4 came out the first day I played MP i was owning there
Comment