Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WinXP isn't going anywhere
Collapse
X
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Originally posted by Alex98ukNice points.
Anyway, what's better for a netbook, Ubuntu or XP, i can't really decide. I see the advantages of both.
Although, backtrack 3 might be an idea
So you openly admit that you would like to use a WEP based exploitation to gain access to my system?
Alex, I've heard of your attempts to do the same to GamersCrib. That would qualify as a crime here in the US.
Good thing I have Ethereal sniffing away.
Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Originally posted by |D|-Jaws View PostSo you openly admit that you would like to use a WEP based exploitation to gain access to my system?
Originally posted by |D|-Jaws View PostAlex, I've heard of your attempts to do the same to GamersCrib. That would qualify as a crime here in the US.
Originally posted by |D|-Jaws View PostGood thing I have Ethereal sniffing away.
Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Holy dookie batman. Win 7 is better at Beta than Vista is post-sp1. Which brings me back on topic: pricing and "tiering" will be key. If MS does the wise thing and simply releases Win 7 at the ~$100 price point, not only will MS clean up, they might very well regain some ground against Linux (Unbuntu in particular) and the Macsters.
Part of the problem with Vista (aside from it being released at what can only be described as a pre-alpha stage of development) is that it came in more flavors than Baskin-Robbins ice cream, and you could have paid as much as $400 at launch for the "good one" (Windows Vista Premium Deluxe Business 64 bit Hooray Ultimate Extra-shiny Edition XXXtreme*).
All-in-all, I think it's quite likely that the folks who really matter for OS adoption (enterprise CIO's, academia, government, and SMB owners) may actually go for 7, especially as deteriorating hardware dictates replacements anyway. Then again, they may just dump the old hardware and reuse their old XP images to save a few thousand/hundred thousand/million bucks, keep all the legacy devices happy, and the so-called "retraining costs" low, lol.
It'll definitely be interesting to see what happens now that it looks like MS will release something worth buying. I'm not giving up my volume license copy of XP anytime soon, mind you :P
*funny thing is, I only made up four of those if memory serves
Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Originally posted by megawhompertoo View PostPart of the problem with Vista (aside from it being released at what can only be described as a pre-alpha stage of development) is that it came in more flavors than Baskin-Robbins ice cream, and you could have paid as much as $400 at launch for the "good one" (Windows Vista Premium Deluxe Business 64 bit Hooray Ultimate Extra-shiny Edition XXXtreme*).
Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Originally posted by megawhompertoo View PostHoly dookie batman. Win 7 is better at Beta than Vista is post-sp1. Which brings me back on topic: pricing and "tiering" will be key. If MS does the wise thing and simply releases Win 7 at the ~$100 price point, not only will MS clean up, they might very well regain some ground against Linux (Unbuntu in particular) and the Macsters.
Originally posted by megawhompertoo View PostPart of the problem with Vista (aside from it being released at what can only be described as a pre-alpha stage of development) is that it came in more flavors than Baskin-Robbins ice cream, and you could have paid as much as $400 at launch for the "good one" (Windows Vista Premium Deluxe Business 64 bit Hooray Ultimate Extra-shiny Edition XXXtreme*).
Too many flavors huh? Because four is a whole lot more than three, right? And if you count Windows XP x64, that's 4 versions, since Windows XP x64 isn't based off of Windows XP.
Originally posted by megawhompertoo View PostAll-in-all, I think it's quite likely that the folks who really matter for OS adoption (enterprise CIO's, academia, government, and SMB owners) may actually go for 7, especially as deteriorating hardware dictates replacements anyway. Then again, they may just dump the old hardware and reuse their old XP images to save a few thousand/hundred thousand/million bucks, keep all the legacy devices happy, and the so-called "retraining costs" low, lol.
Originally posted by megawhompertoo View PostIt'll definitely be interesting to see what happens now that it looks like MS will release something worth buying. I'm not giving up my volume license copy of XP anytime soon, mind you :P
*funny thing is, I only made up four of those if memory serves
I think Windows 7 is great, and it's definitely worth it for the people who haven't already upgraded to Vista, but those who own Vista aren't going to gain a whole lot by moving to Windows 7.
Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Originally posted by [MyIS]Zips View PostI dunno Alec, I'm quite enjoying Win7 over Vista...
Installing drivers without rebooting is pretty damn ****in' awesome. Am I going to pay $100 for it? Probably not.
Now, if they redid the Audio Stack Architecture and reduced the latency through the DirectSound interface enough that I wouldn't need to use things like Audio Stream Input Output, I'd probably find that a great feature.
Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Originally posted by AbJ32 View PostI honestly don't think I'll be buying Windows 7. It's so similar to Windows Vista(Which I already own a copy of) in performance and functionality that it'd be almost pointless. It's got the same kernel and a slightly updated version of the same driver model, and a new GUI, and those are the only major changes. Everything else is just a large accumulation of small improvements.
I think Windows 7 is great, and it's definitely worth it for the people who haven't already upgraded to Vista, but those who own Vista aren't going to gain a whole lot by moving to Windows 7.
I didn't, and I will definitely benefit from your sacrifice.
I salute you.
Provided the release version is as good as what they've let me play with
edit, re-reading your fanpost, do you have any idea what the percentage gain for other-than-MS-OS's has been since Vista's launch? I'm not bashing MS on this one, everyone goofs once in a while.
Your abstention from reality, however, deserves attention. :P
Vista was the best thing in the past decade for Ubuntu, in particular, and also OSX, although mac folks seem to gravitate towards Steve Jobs whatevever.
That's just looking at the data, rather than your techfanboi appreciation.
I look forward to Win 7 release. The only thing that would make it not good enough to reassert MS's monopoly on operating systems is if they bork it or make it cost $200-400.
It's like win2k, only newer. :P
Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
I've been hearing very favorable comments about Win 7 all across multiple boards. I'm very hopeful for this release, never bothered to upgrade to Vista due to its suckiness. How it transgresses from the beta to SP1 (the old rule, never upgrade until SP1) remains to be seen.
I've become an OS X convert. Next build will be a Hackintosh/Win 7 dual boot (hopefully!). Rumor is that Apple is tweaking the forthcoming release (Snow Leopard) due to the positive comments of Win 7.
Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Originally posted by Alex98uk View PostAll tests so far show Windows 7 ahead of XP.
In fact, most post SP1 Vista tests show the 64bit version ahead of XP.
But, real men run Linux Redhat lol!
might try windows 7 out on my laptop, how big is the 64 bit version? Ive got an 4.3gb re-writable dvd sitting on my desk which i could use if the file isnt too large
Comment
Comment