WinXP isn't going anywhere
Collapse
X
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Originally posted by Alex98ukNice points.
Anyway, what's better for a netbook, Ubuntu or XP, i can't really decide. I see the advantages of both.
Although, backtrack 3 might be an idea :p
So you openly admit that you would like to use a WEP based exploitation to gain access to my system?
Alex, I've heard of your attempts to do the same to GamersCrib. That would qualify as a crime here in the US.
Good thing I have Ethereal sniffing away.Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
I would have to fly alllll the way to the US, find your house, start up the packet sniffing... and then realise you're on WPA2 :rawr
Quite how you wirelessly hack a website is beyond me :p
I just have the sniffs
Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Holy dookie batman. Win 7 is better at Beta than Vista is post-sp1. Which brings me back on topic: pricing and "tiering" will be key. If MS does the wise thing and simply releases Win 7 at the ~$100 price point, not only will MS clean up, they might very well regain some ground against Linux (Unbuntu in particular) and the Macsters.
Part of the problem with Vista (aside from it being released at what can only be described as a pre-alpha stage of development) is that it came in more flavors than Baskin-Robbins ice cream, and you could have paid as much as $400 at launch for the "good one" (Windows Vista Premium Deluxe Business 64 bit Hooray Ultimate Extra-shiny Edition XXXtreme*).
All-in-all, I think it's quite likely that the folks who really matter for OS adoption (enterprise CIO's, academia, government, and SMB owners) may actually go for 7, especially as deteriorating hardware dictates replacements anyway. Then again, they may just dump the old hardware and reuse their old XP images to save a few thousand/hundred thousand/million bucks, keep all the legacy devices happy, and the so-called "retraining costs" low, lol.
It'll definitely be interesting to see what happens now that it looks like MS will release something worth buying. I'm not giving up my volume license copy of XP anytime soon, mind you :P
*funny thing is, I only made up four of those if memory servesComment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Well, the beta is labeled as "Windows 7 Ultimate" and comes both in 32 and 64 bit versions, so it doesn't look like that will changePart of the problem with Vista (aside from it being released at what can only be described as a pre-alpha stage of development) is that it came in more flavors than Baskin-Robbins ice cream, and you could have paid as much as $400 at launch for the "good one" (Windows Vista Premium Deluxe Business 64 bit Hooray Ultimate Extra-shiny Edition XXXtreme*).Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Oh yeah, they sure lost a lot of ground, didn't they? I hear Linux is up to 0.85% of the desktop market share.Holy dookie batman. Win 7 is better at Beta than Vista is post-sp1. Which brings me back on topic: pricing and "tiering" will be key. If MS does the wise thing and simply releases Win 7 at the ~$100 price point, not only will MS clean up, they might very well regain some ground against Linux (Unbuntu in particular) and the Macsters.
If Vista was release as 'pre-alpha', then the only way to describe Windows XP at launch would be to say it was still in the planning phase when it came out. How people can forget these things so fast....None of this is new, all the things people say about Vista have been said about XP, and look where it ended up.Part of the problem with Vista (aside from it being released at what can only be described as a pre-alpha stage of development) is that it came in more flavors than Baskin-Robbins ice cream, and you could have paid as much as $400 at launch for the "good one" (Windows Vista Premium Deluxe Business 64 bit Hooray Ultimate Extra-shiny Edition XXXtreme*).
Too many flavors huh? Because four is a whole lot more than three, right? And if you count Windows XP x64, that's 4 versions, since Windows XP x64 isn't based off of Windows XP.
Pleasing the Enterprise world is always impossible. Most of the time, they'll upgrade when they absolutely have to, not when the new operating system comes out.All-in-all, I think it's quite likely that the folks who really matter for OS adoption (enterprise CIO's, academia, government, and SMB owners) may actually go for 7, especially as deteriorating hardware dictates replacements anyway. Then again, they may just dump the old hardware and reuse their old XP images to save a few thousand/hundred thousand/million bucks, keep all the legacy devices happy, and the so-called "retraining costs" low, lol.
I honestly don't think I'll be buying Windows 7. It's so similar to Windows Vista(Which I already own a copy of) in performance and functionality that it'd be almost pointless. It's got the same kernel and a slightly updated version of the same driver model, and a new GUI, and those are the only major changes. Everything else is just a large accumulation of small improvements.
I think Windows 7 is great, and it's definitely worth it for the people who haven't already upgraded to Vista, but those who own Vista aren't going to gain a whole lot by moving to Windows 7.Comment
-
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Maybe it's a matter of perspective, then. From your point of view, the features Windows 7 adds may seem totally worth it. For me, they don't really give much benefit.
Installing drivers without rebooting is pretty damn ****in' awesome. Am I going to pay $100 for it? Probably not.
Now, if they redid the Audio Stack Architecture and reduced the latency through the DirectSound interface enough that I wouldn't need to use things like Audio Stream Input Output, I'd probably find that a great feature.Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
I honestly appreciate you paying for vista to beta test it through at least one service pack through Win 7.I honestly don't think I'll be buying Windows 7. It's so similar to Windows Vista(Which I already own a copy of) in performance and functionality that it'd be almost pointless. It's got the same kernel and a slightly updated version of the same driver model, and a new GUI, and those are the only major changes. Everything else is just a large accumulation of small improvements.
I think Windows 7 is great, and it's definitely worth it for the people who haven't already upgraded to Vista, but those who own Vista aren't going to gain a whole lot by moving to Windows 7.
I didn't, and I will definitely benefit from your sacrifice.
I salute you.
Provided the release version is as good as what they've let me play with :)
edit, re-reading your fanpost, do you have any idea what the percentage gain for other-than-MS-OS's has been since Vista's launch? I'm not bashing MS on this one, everyone goofs once in a while.
Your abstention from reality, however, deserves attention. :P
Vista was the best thing in the past decade for Ubuntu, in particular, and also OSX, although mac folks seem to gravitate towards Steve Jobs whatevever.
That's just looking at the data, rather than your techfanboi appreciation.
I look forward to Win 7 release. The only thing that would make it not good enough to reassert MS's monopoly on operating systems is if they bork it or make it cost $200-400.
It's like win2k, only newer. :PComment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
I've been hearing very favorable comments about Win 7 all across multiple boards. I'm very hopeful for this release, never bothered to upgrade to Vista due to its suckiness. How it transgresses from the beta to SP1 (the old rule, never upgrade until SP1) remains to be seen.
I've become an OS X convert. Next build will be a Hackintosh/Win 7 dual boot (hopefully!). Rumor is that Apple is tweaking the forthcoming release (Snow Leopard) due to the positive comments of Win 7.Comment
-
Re: WinXP isn't going anywhere
Nah, all the cool kids runs kernel based knoppix linux
might try windows 7 out on my laptop, how big is the 64 bit version? Ive got an 4.3gb re-writable dvd sitting on my desk which i could use if the file isnt too largeComment
-


Comment