Only the default (TGN Light) theme for now. Dark them is also coming back soon. Then CSN. Then Wrestlin' Nation. A lot of WIP stuff right now. There are a couple of things still not working either. Sorry.
So because real tanks, require more than one person to operate the driving and gunning, it should work ingame? LOL here's your clue back as you appear to have lost yours.
Maybe you would be better off playing tic-tac-toe, something one person can do.
it would be more realistic but as DICE say and i qoute "with Realism brings Complexity" but I guess they should have like a test run of this idea so they can see what people think of it
The realism is why people play, or do you play to look at the pretty colors? As I said, the tank loader I'm sure is one crew member that even I would pass on, BUT having the driver and gunner seperate would make it more realistic. After all, the game is "modern warfare" (EA).
Join a game and spend the whole game as the gunner on a humvee. After about 5 minutes, you'll understand why this is a terrible idea.
I have and it works great if I have a driver that I can talk to. If I don't have a driver, I move the hummer where I can start shooting (though I prefer to run people over, as I stated in another thread of mine).
If the U.S. Army can make it work, then anyone else can. If you can't, then that's really sad.
Originally posted by JoeBannon
The realism is why people play, or do you play to look at the pretty colors? As I said, the tank loader I'm sure is one crew member that even I would pass on, BUT having the driver and gunner seperate would make it more realistic. After all, the game is "modern warfare" (EA).
did he just say its bf2 is realistic? did he just say crewed tanks are a good idea because its realistic? surely he didnt, he cant have. he did? ohmygoshohmygoshohmygosh.
wrong answer.
ppl play AA beause its realistic. ppl play bf2 because its fun.
The realism is why people play, or do you play to look at the pretty colors? As I said, the tank loader I'm sure is one crew member that even I would pass on, BUT having the driver and gunner seperate would make it more realistic. After all, the game is "modern warfare" (EA).
Take your realism and shove it, this won't work on public servers.
Why, God, why does this idea keep coming being suggested?
Anyone who has played this game for more than 5 minutes will know that this idea will NEVER work. Remember how people complained about the 2 person artillery in BF42? Voice coms or not, there are too many asshats out there for this to even be remotely possible.
I like it. If the gunner jumps out of the BH, the pilot will stay in and try and get others. I think the commander isn't such a hot idea, but gunner and a driver would be nice.
I like it. If the gunner jumps out of the BH, the pilot will stay in and try and get others. I think the commander isn't such a hot idea, but gunner and a driver would be nice.
You would have to merge the gunner and commander. A real tank gunner only aims and fires. The commander selects the target.
This idea will only be fully realized with a mod..perhaps.
I like BF2 the way it is atm as far as the vehicles are concerned as each and every single person can drive/fly when and if they need to, with the added bonus of being able to protect yourself on most occassions without doing a quick seat swap.
Like it or not, it's primarily an arcade game based, very loosley, on real life weapons functioning in today's modern armies. The game is reasonably well balanced with a couple of exceptions, so that everyone has a fair chance to have fun.
DUDE this is a GAME its ment for FUN stop relating the real army to this game you just make your self look like an asshat
If you'd get your face out of my ass crack, maybe you'd get my point that if you can't handle anything as simple as this, then they shouldn't join the Army (ie, it's really pathetic you can't handle the Army). You can get your face out of my ass now.
trust me i can handle the army i have been handling it for 5 years now and still your thinking that if someone cant handle something complex that they cant or should not be in the army i dont see why not there are plenty of places in the army that do net require you to do complex things
trust me i can handle the army i have been handling it for 5 years now and still your thinking that if someone cant handle something complex that they cant or should not be in the army i dont see why not there are plenty of places in the army that do net require you to do complex things
No, it's if you can't handle anything as SIMPLE as this, then don't join the Army.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment