I like BF2 for it's large play areas. As Q4 is using the Doom3 engine I don't think this will be one it's major selling points (just a guess). So, no doubt I'll give it a shot, but I don't think it's gonna be a big pull for me.
Also this quote from a playtest: "From what we can tell, you'll be well served in Quake 4 by classic deathmatch skills such as keeping an eye on important items and weapons and controlling them by snatching them up at respawn" - that kinda put's me off. I've been doing that for 10 years and am pretty bored of it now.
I played quake 2 on a p120 with 16 megs of RAM, which for the time was a really crappy computer, and it ran better than BF does on my brand new £1000 beast.
Also this quote from a playtest: "From what we can tell, you'll be well served in Quake 4 by classic deathmatch skills such as keeping an eye on important items and weapons and controlling them by snatching them up at respawn" - that kinda put's me off. I've been doing that for 10 years and am pretty bored of it now.
Id would create hardware straining games that would try and force people to go out and buy top end video cards.
reality first person shooter
Comment