Vehicles or not?

**TrudgiN** · 03-29-2009, 02:58 PM

Re: Vehicles or not?

noooooo :)

**imported_Recon** · 03-29-2009, 03:07 PM

Re: Vehicles or not?

I voted no, nobody seems to have felt 'vehicle-less' throughout the CoD games. I also think that tanks in WaW was kinda stupid, because you got the people that would get into a tank and not die for the whole match..
CoD is an First Person Shooter, not a First Vehicle Shooter.
However, what other people have been saying about being able to control the Helicopter while it's in, or whatever they are going to feature in MW2, is a good idea imo, as it would make the heli less.. hax
And yes, vehicles should be kept to BF.
:salute:

**CtrlAltDe1337** · 03-29-2009, 10:40 PM

Re: Vehicles or not?

I would love tanks. I liked the direction that COD:WaW went, but it was still quite lacking.

**Piemaaan!** · 03-30-2009, 07:01 AM

Re: Vehicles or not?

I want tanks, UO was pro.

**iQue** · 03-30-2009, 07:04 AM

Re: Vehicles or not?

Meh.

UO did a pretty good job, but if there's going to be vehicles, it should include many different vehicles, large maps and similar. The tanks in CoD:WW just seemed like some lame attempt to reach a larger audience

**Piemaaan!** · 03-30-2009, 07:13 AM

Re: Vehicles or not?

^agreed. WaW didn't pull off vehicles. But if they'd had Half Tracks and Jeeps (with larger maps, obv.) it would've worked a LOT better, in terms of vehicles.

**CptainCrunch** · 03-30-2009, 08:39 AM

Re: Vehicles or not?

If we want large maps, we should have vehicles. Running miles then getting shot and having to re-run again is no fun.

Tanks are easy to destroy.

For MW2, maybe keeps with a mounted gun. Tanks would move VERY fast in MW times.

Crunch