Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • imported_Whiskey
    Member
    • May 2007
    • 3325

    #46
    Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

    @Minmaster - I don't think the popularity and power of a game like BF2 is lost on developers/publishers, but they are limited by the technology of current-gen Consoles, and because of economics, it doesn't make sense for most of them to make a PC-only game when the real profits come from Console sales.

    I do think we'll see more games like BF2, especially once the 3rd Gen of Consoles (PS4 & Xbox3) show up a few yrs down the road. They should be powerful enough for the player numbers and size of battles that many people want, and at that time, companies can make those games for both Consoles and PC, thus maximizing their profits.

    Comment

    • Stev0esque
      5t3v0 (I miss leetspeech)
      • Feb 2008
      • 6786

      #47
      Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

      Im still waiting for the facepalm pic

      Comment

      • Rambo
        TBF FOREVER!
        • Aug 2005
        • 3022

        #48
        Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

        OP flashpoint 2 has some cool new trailers and looks tha biz:thumbsup:

        Comment

        • Augustus
          Member
          • Jul 2007
          • 254

          #49
          Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

          OP2 won't appeal to BF2 players any more than ARMA does. Regular players don't want to spent 90 seconds setting up their Javelin before they can fire.

          Comment

          • Rambo
            TBF FOREVER!
            • Aug 2005
            • 3022

            #50
            Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

            Originally posted by Augustus
            OP2 won't appeal to BF2 players any more than ARMA does. Regular players don't want to spent 90 seconds setting up their Javelin before they can fire.
            well now consoles have stolen the game from PC and made it into a kiddie Arcade title it will have to be another game company

            Comment

            • Kodakk
              Member
              • Oct 2006
              • 3486

              #51
              Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

              Originally posted by Augustus
              OP2 won't appeal to BF2 players any more than ARMA does. Regular players don't want to spent 90 seconds setting up their Javelin before they can fire.
              Agreed, and that very sentiment is apparent in other series as well. The addition of perks in games such as Call of Duty has been done to appeal more to the casual crowd, and, while it may not be a perfect example, demonstrates the general community's desire for more casual games.

              I personally love simulators like ArmA and I find them to be much more entertaining than games such as BF2 when played with the right team, primarily because you can do so much more in the open-world with realistic weaponry, but it's not much of a boredom-killer as it requires more time/focus to play properly.

              Comment

              • *FMJ*Power
                Gunny
                • Jan 2006
                • 1259

                #52
                Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

                i saw this video posted on gametrailers today showcasing the new track ir 5 and ARMA 2. definitely looks like it will be worth the purchase.

                [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wXx3vMy_AQ&fmt=22[/media]



                check the high def version.

                Comment

                • Teh_Diplomat
                  Member
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 287

                  #53
                  Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

                  Originally posted by 5t3v0
                  Im still waiting for the facepalm pic
                  Wait no longer...


                  Comment

                  • Stev0esque
                    5t3v0 (I miss leetspeech)
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 6786

                    #54
                    Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

                    Originally posted by Teh_Diplomat
                    Wait no longer...


                    not good enough

                    Comment

                    • Deesies
                      Member
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 1021

                      #55
                      Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

                      If it's anything like the first ArmA then absolutely not.

                      Comment

                      • old sch00l
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 1087

                        #56
                        Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

                        only for the hardcore, come a long way since the boys leaving flashpoint. Cannot wait!

                        Comment

                        • therealmat
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 1783

                          #57
                          Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

                          Nope,

                          MAG on the other hand. *drools*

                          Comment

                          • Rambo
                            TBF FOREVER!
                            • Aug 2005
                            • 3022

                            #58
                            Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

                            Originally posted by Augustus
                            OP2 won't appeal to BF2 players any more than ARMA does. Regular players don't want to spent 90 seconds setting up their Javelin before they can fire.
                            its 90 seconds what else you going to do ?pick your nose?:laugh: or dolphin dive your way to victory:p

                            Comment

                            • =98=
                              Member
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 10299

                              #59
                              Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

                              Originally posted by xRAMBOx
                              its 90 seconds what else you going to do ?pick your nose?:laugh: or dolphin dive your way to victory:p
                              Have fun?

                              Comment

                              • [29ID]B|Pvt.Mickd
                                Member
                                • Nov 2006
                                • 138

                                #60
                                Re: Could ARMA 2 be the true successor to Battlefield 2?

                                Originally posted by raidenandsolid
                                Won't Arma2 support more than 64 players? I recall seeing ArmA servers with well over 100 slots for players to join...
                                The player limit is theoretically unlimited. The game only officially supports 50+ or something however this is NOT hard coded. We have played at IC-ArmAIC-ArmA with 128 people at one time with no lag. We still regularly play and i mean week on week with 80 people in a battle at one time.

                                Comment

                                Working...