This ain't battlefield

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RanCorX2
    Member
    • Aug 2006
    • 94

    #76
    Re: This ain't battlefield

    Originally posted by BIFF EXPLODER
    actually BF2 for me was the worst of the series, 1942 continues to be the best in many many ways, BFV had many things to be very good but the engine killed the game, and 2142 for me is alot more fun then BF2.

    the content of 1942 alone throws BF2 away into oblivion.
    Except 1942 doesn't look good today, the levels are too empty and dull compared to today's visuals.

    Comment

    • BIFF EXPLODER
      Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 1136

      #77
      Re: This ain't battlefield

      meh, visuals arent everything, i'd be fine with its visuals, the gameplay of infantry and the outdated netcode are what bug me these days.

      Comment

      • RanCorX2
        Member
        • Aug 2006
        • 94

        #78
        Re: This ain't battlefield

        Originally posted by theminx
        yes yes no rushing because we dont want bf3 to turn out like the frontlines failure
        front lines could have been so great...what a shame..absolute fail
        frontlines was not a fail, its a excellent game, great visuals and very fun gameplay.

        Originally posted by BIFF EXPLODER
        meh, visuals arent everything, i'd be fine with its visuals, the gameplay of infantry and the outdated netcode are what bug me these days.
        not just the visuals that are bad, the hud is horrid and the text on in game screens do not display well at higher resolutions. It's just too outdated to be played, I just bought it too complete my bf collection

        Comment

        • CptainCrunch
          I am the 1%
          • Oct 2007
          • 12976

          #79
          Re: This ain't battlefield

          Originally posted by RanCorX2
          frontlines was not a fail, its a excellent game, great visuals and very fun gameplay.
          Frontline was not a fail on graphics, gameplay, ideas of vehicles and remotes, but the game was not ready for release and it died a horrible death and used as an example to others. Yes, some played it or may still be playing it, but within three months everything to make the community grow died.

          Crunch
          Twitter: @CptainCrunch
          Battlelog/Origin: CptainCrunch

          Comment

          • Wizrdwarts
            Member
            • Dec 2006
            • 3754

            #80
            Re: This ain't battlefield

            Originally posted by RanCorX2
            frontlines was not a fail, its a excellent game, great visuals and very fun gameplay.
            Let's let the people decide:




            BF2142: 1147 servers, 2866 players
            FFOW: 14 servers, 48 players

            Multiplayer has always been these types of games' strong point.. How was FFoW's SP? at least it had a campaign.

            Comment

            • RanCorX2
              Member
              • Aug 2006
              • 94

              #81
              Re: This ain't battlefield

              granted people were scared off by the bugs, but I still like it and play, but yea I play BF2 more.

              Comment

              • Minmaster
                I DON'T PLAY CS!
                • Nov 2006
                • 4112

                #82
                Re: This ain't battlefield

                i agree this really ain't BF. i tried it out for 10 minutes, then quit. and i have no desire to play the game again. granted i should give it more time, but i just can't stand this game. not so much the cartoony graphics, but all these little decorating and buying things for your character and pts. system, it's just like dress up dolls which i detest in my games. i suppose little girls would like this game more than me.

                Comment

                • Wizrdwarts
                  Member
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 3754

                  #83
                  Re: This ain't battlefield

                  Well the hardcore BF player isn't exactly the target audience lol, it's dumbed down just to introduce people to the franchise I guess.

                  Comment

                  • Sepp_Dietrich
                    Awaiting Moderation
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 168

                    #84
                    Re: This ain't battlefield

                    Originally posted by Minmaster
                    i agree this really ain't BF. i tried it out for 10 minutes, then quit. and i have no desire to play the game again. granted i should give it more time, but i just can't stand this game. not so much the cartoony graphics, but all these little decorating and buying things for your character and pts. system, it's just like dress up dolls which i detest in my games.

                    This.

                    Comment

                    • FPS[SONIC]
                      Member
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 2106

                      #85
                      Re: This ain't battlefield

                      I second that.

                      Comment

                      • [55RA]W|Pvt.shiftydood

                        #86
                        Re: This ain't battlefield

                        Originally posted by Alex98uk
                        they might get it right this time :yay:
                        you're joking... right...

                        Comment

                        • Vreki
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2007
                          • 4226

                          #87
                          Re: This ain't battlefield

                          Originally posted by CptainCrunch
                          Frontline was not a fail on graphics, gameplay, ideas of vehicles and remotes, but the game was not ready for release and it died a horrible death and used as an example to others. Yes, some played it or may still be playing it, but within three months everything to make the community grow died.

                          Crunch
                          Speaking of FFOW, I can see its now available for €9.99 on steam, and even less in some stores.
                          As far as I remember, what made me turn it down was a horrendous net coding that made it impossible to hit anything when there was the slightest lag.
                          Did they ever manage to fix that?
                          Or does the game at least have an interesting SP mode?.

                          Comment

                          • Piemaaan!
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2007
                            • 1485

                            #88
                            Re: This ain't battlefield

                            I just played BFH Beta, it's a joke right?

                            Comment

                            • Danny_HR
                              Member
                              • Nov 2007
                              • 59

                              #89
                              Re: This ain't battlefield

                              Originally posted by [202K]1|Cool.Pieman'
                              I just played BFH Beta, it's a joke right?
                              Man, i wish!

                              Comment

                              • [Expletive Deleted]
                                The Penetrator
                                • Oct 2006
                                • 2855

                                #90
                                Re: This ain't battlefield

                                Originally posted by [202K]1|Cool.Pieman'
                                I just played BFH Beta, it's a joke right?
                                I think it's pretty funny. The punchline is: for it to make any profit at this point, it has to be the most popular Battlefield game in the history of the series.

                                Comment

                                Working...