Stop trying to save face and admit you were wrong. The next step will be me linking to the weapon stats: if that doesn't shut you up, I don't know what will.
Edit:
I'll just link you straight to it because I want to make sure you realize how retarded this argument is.
Damage of 30-40 everywhere except with silencer, which is 20-40
Damage of 20-30 everywhere
Damage of 20-30 everywhere
In other words, they're THE F*CKING SAME IN HARDCORE MODE. Leaving aside ROF, iron sights are clearly superior on the AK, which makes it the preferred automatic assault rifle to silence for Hardcore mode.
Are you convinced yet, or will you attempt to move the argument into ROF territory to try and save face when we weren't discussing this?
Edit2:
Since I know you're bound to bring it up, I made a nice little chart.
ROF Time
12.5 2.4
13.33 2.25
11.76 2.55
Where "ROF" refers to the number of rounds per second, and "Time" refers to the seconds required to empty one magazine.
As you can see, they're practically the same: you're not going to notice this theoretical difference in action because it ultimately translates to less than four additional bullets in favor of the M4 if compared with an AK. I don't want to diminish you, but if that marginal difference means that much to your overall survivability, I question your worth/skill.
Since we've already established the futility of arguing in favor of ROF and damage, we're left with recoil and iron sights. The real question, then, is "are you willing to sacrifice better iron sights in favor of less recoil"?
I've made my choice.
Edit:
I'll just link you straight to it because I want to make sure you realize how retarded this argument is.
Damage of 30-40 everywhere except with silencer, which is 20-40
Damage of 20-30 everywhere
Damage of 20-30 everywhere
In other words, they're THE F*CKING SAME IN HARDCORE MODE. Leaving aside ROF, iron sights are clearly superior on the AK, which makes it the preferred automatic assault rifle to silence for Hardcore mode.
Are you convinced yet, or will you attempt to move the argument into ROF territory to try and save face when we weren't discussing this?
Edit2:
Since I know you're bound to bring it up, I made a nice little chart.
ROF Time
12.5 2.4
13.33 2.25
11.76 2.55
Where "ROF" refers to the number of rounds per second, and "Time" refers to the seconds required to empty one magazine.
As you can see, they're practically the same: you're not going to notice this theoretical difference in action because it ultimately translates to less than four additional bullets in favor of the M4 if compared with an AK. I don't want to diminish you, but if that marginal difference means that much to your overall survivability, I question your worth/skill.
Since we've already established the futility of arguing in favor of ROF and damage, we're left with recoil and iron sights. The real question, then, is "are you willing to sacrifice better iron sights in favor of less recoil"?
I've made my choice.

Comment