The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread :D

[[WS] TKMR]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

They can be standing inside, they don't have to be apart of the vehicle itself. Though through that the bag of the soldier glitching around and hopping around would have to be fixed. There should be a way to get around that.

Please don't go around shooting down others ideas, and not contribute anything yourself.

That made me think. In 1942 there was the Landing boats, can't remember what their called, but if you "got in" away from the driver/gunner position, it put you in a numberless seat. What I mean is, once I entered the vehicle, and weren't a driver/gunner, you couldn't switch seats to be driver/gunner, or any other passenger seats, could this be a loophole that could be done with the BF2 engine?

[imported_youm0nt]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

They can be standing inside, they don't have to be apart of the vehicle itself. Though through that the bag of the soldier glitching around and hopping around would have to be fixed. There should be a way to get around that.
That made me think. In 1942 there was the Landing boats, can't remember what their called, but if you "got in" away from the driver/gunner position, it put you in a numberless seat. What I mean is, once I entered the vehicle, and weren't a driver/gunner, you couldn't switch seats to be driver/gunner, or any other passenger seats, could this be a loophole that could be done with the BF2 engine?

Not possible on the BF2 engine to have a player standing inside a vehicle. For example, you can't have a soldier standing up on the RIB while it's moving or else you will start bugging out and just die. There's a reason why you can't go into the PLA or MEC transport helicopters from the back. You actually have to be in the numbered positions in the vehicle.

[Sike]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

Not possible on the BF2 engine to have a player standing inside a vehicle. For example, you can't have a soldier standing up on the RIB while it's moving or else you will start bugging out and just die. There's a reason why you can't go into the PLA or MEC transport helicopters from the back. You actually have to be in the numbered positions in the vehicle.

did u see the 0.5 merlin video, he was walking around in it.

[imported_youm0nt]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

did u see the 0.5 merlin video, he was walking around in it.

The Merllin was flying/hovering really slow though. If you go in the back of Merlin standing up and the Merlin starts flying fast, you'll be dead for sure. You'd have to go really slow and cautious to allow soldiers standing up in the Merlin. Though you wouldn't want to be caught in a slow helicopter while on Operation Ghost Train or Al Basrah that's for sure

[KatieWolf]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

Haha :laugh:

Katie: 1
[WS] TKMR: 0

did u see the 0.5 merlin video, he was walking around in it.

Yeah, I think they were walking inside it, but then later, they probably sat down when the Merlin door begin to shut.

But however, its possible to create a Chinook as a spawn point, so you can have Marines spawning out of it, but otherwise, the max limits per vehicle is still 8.

Oh and now that you mentioned about the Chinook, here's the scene of it being used in the movie, " Rules of Engagement", its similiar to watching Black Hawk Down, except they're not in Somalia and only sent in to stop the mobs at the Embassy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTeE3EdL4qE&mode=related&search=

Scene: 4:15

[CloudV2]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

i would like to see a change in how the M16 moves off the target (for lack of a better term) on single shot. because it moves off the same as if it were burst shot. also theres to much zoom on the M16 for it to be iorn sights. however the L85 set dont have enough. (mind you this is all my opinion) other then that this mod is very well done and extremely fun. :)

[imported_youm0nt]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

also theres to much zoom on the M16 for it to be iorn sights.

That's a scope/zoom placeholder until the M16s get proper scopes.

[CloudV2]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

That's a scope/zoom placeholder until the M16s get proper scopes.

nice, the M16s are getting scopes.

[solofowaffles]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

well my computer is backand running soon as i get home ill download it

[CDN-SMOKEJUMPER]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

If you know anything about hard-coding than its that, YOU CANT GET A VEHICLE TO HAVE MORE THAN 8 Players to sit on it. So your little Chinook idea is toasted.

You really can't help yourself can you....

I'm willing to bet you're quite popular with the ladies with an attitude like that.

[KatieWolf]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

Are you trying to start the flame war again? Just get over it.

[CDN-SMOKEJUMPER]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

You don't need to be mean to everyone. Some people in here are in actuality children so you should watch yourself.

As mothers say, if you don't have anything nice to say.

I know it's hard for you but try anyway.

Back on topic:

As for the scopes, I can't wait for them as I can't stand how much the zoom feature limits field of view where you are shooting.

I think they should have left them alone instead of the quick fix. I know people where complaining but a half assed job is worse. Not a bash at the PR Devs boys I love the mod! Just my little whinge, but I do understand why you did it.

[GeZe]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

Instead of the AKM, I'd like to see the AK-74.

The Russian Army Faction will be using the AK-74M.

[CDN-SMOKEJUMPER]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

Hey, the British Special Forces use the C-8 Carbine so I'd like it to be updated with the new green furniture.

Oh wait, looks like the PrDevs got it bang on.

http://www.coltcanada.com/sfw-page.htm

[imported_Tren]

Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread

Lets try to keep the thread to ideas and other on-topic comments.

My fire extinguisher is getting tired. :)