Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread 
working on mortars for v0.7.
working on mortars for v0.7.
-
-
Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread
Actually, as far as I know, It's 200 meters, so 650 feet. But yes, EA still fails.Originally posted by EddieJesus, you almost gave me a heart attack until I realised you were joking! It's a shame because we all know soldiers parachute out of helicopters hovering at 200ft. Oh EA, how wise and knowledgeable you are
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread
First of all, thank you for including mortars in the future. I loved them on DC, they were very effective and grossly under-utilized.
Not too keen on the Osprey though. As someone who's around one almost everyday, they are a very loud flying hunk of junk. It's going to be difficult inserting spec ops soldiers, this program should have been canned 20 years ago.Comment
-
Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread
as i said before, i would really love to see a Special Forces team(SAS or SEALS) with MP5's PSG-1 and a really close quaters map for 16 player only.Comment
-
Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread
That would have to be one hell of a big Water map to make the LCAC usefull.Originally posted by camperstrikeComment
-
Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread
How about some nice shiny new skins for the existing troops needing an overhaul?
Oh wait, I shouldn't be suggesting vialbe things should I?
okay then..............
Fastroping!!!Comment
-
Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread
My stuffzorz from teh locked postz
1. I think you guys should make 99% of things in PR destructable. Like the buildings, even the trees. I mean if you crash into a tree with a plane its going down.
2. You guys should figure out a way to make it so you can talk to your whole team using VIOP like you do with commander. This way you can call in an airstrike if you need one and the guy in the jet isnt on your team. Yeah I guess Teamspeak would work but not everyone uses it.
3. The airports should be made like real airports. The planes should be in hangers. You should also have to taxi to the runway before you can take off. I guess you would need to guess on how long it would take to get the the runway and make it so the plane cant go faster then that for a certain amount of time. I play LockOn and Flight Sim and Im a real pilot and I know what its like to taxi to a runway This would add more realism to the mod.
4. I think we need to add a B-1 Lancer into Project Reality. Nothing like f***ing up a whole city by carpet bombing.
5. I think that there should be a wider range of aircraft. Sence I belive the US only has the A-10 and the F-16. Why not add a F-15 and a F-18 to it. Along with the Bone.
6. I have been watching the news lately on the war in Iraq and Im saying a lot of AK-47s with a SVD and an RPG here and there. However in PR the MEC weapons are mostly G3s. I always wondered why? SO maybe a weapon switch would be good. Depends on what everyone else thinks its not a big deal I just wanted to suggest it.
7. MORE BLOOD if we can find a way cause I like to see my brains of the enemy I just sniped in the head fly all over the place haha.
8. I dont know if you did this already but have all the squads have their own group of limited kits. This way its kinda even for the squads. However thinking about it there would be an increase in snipers and Heavy Machine Gunners. But not like theres not a butt load of snipers in Iraq already.
9. What about sniper spotter teams? Me and Thrifty want to do a sniper spotter team but you need 3 people in the squad to request a kit. Whats the other person gonna do? I think thats why it should be changed to 2 people then you can request a kit.Comment
-
Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread
PR is cool, i would play it alot if it wasnt for the "asking for a kit" im sure lotsa peep like that but not me, im not flaming, jsut sayiing what i'd change if it was mine.
And this would be cool for any bf2 game or mod, make arty moveable, and needing to be manually fired by someone or a couple of team , just like real thing.Comment
-
Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread
@Navras
1. is possible but then we wouldnt have that many statics in the maps cos there is a limit on how many networkable objects the engine can handel, and things like dynamic trees would lag the crap out of servers...
2. hardcoded (not possible)
3. cant make 100% realistic airports as it would take up the entier space of a map as most runways are around 4kms long, and the stock BF2 maps are only 2kms x 2kms.
4. ehhh, tks any one?
5. ehhh the USMC has the A-10, the F-16, the F-18 and the F-15 in PR but the F-15 is not currently planned to be used at the moment.
6. ehhh insurgants have the ak-47s etc and what u are watching on the news is insurgent groups. The MEC are not insurgants, they are a fictional fully trained army, and they would buy w/e weapons they like so the G3 fits there bill very much. and yes we do have insurgants in pr...
7. cant do the kinda gore u want very well.
8. its already like that.
9. I think u need 2 in a squad at the moment to be able to get a sniper kit, meaning one can go rifleman and have binocs etc to spot with if needed.
@JustMe0171, POE2 has player controled arty like that :)
In time we plan on doing something a little like that but not any time soon.Comment
-
Re: The NEW PR .7 Ideas thread
thanks, i might give it a try, i allways thought for any mod or vanilla that would be cool.@JustMe0171, POE2 has player controled arty like that
In time we plan on doing something a little like that but not any time soon.Comment
Comment