Cliffe On Balance

[Thortok2000]

-:Nighthawk:- wrote..

I enjoyed Thortok's comments, admittedly, along with a select few others of you.

Funny, I seem to enjoy most of your comments as well. ^_^



Wonder when some newbie will come along and start saying we're the same person...heh.

0marTheZealot wrote..

No matter what, people will pick the guns that will kill the fastest. If AK/M4 were nerfed, everyone would just find a different gun. This is how it is always.

That is why price changes are good.



Think about it. Lose two-three rounds and get the 'gun that kills the fastest'...or get guns that don't kill quite as fast and kill the /other/ team those 2-3 rounds that they're wandering around with pistols.



There's more ways to balance besides killing speed, and the price changes were a good way to do that.

[Pharlap]

narby wrote..

I'm not in England, chief.

sounds like ur trying to sound american by adding a "chief " at the end.

[jbullet]

Edited by [user="216444"] @ [time="1081097094"]

Personally i find all the changes fine, except i reckon the auto-snipers should be higher in price as its all i see nowadays....and the T one is especially outclassing the AWP at every single opportunity, they can run n shoot, have rapid fire, half the time u dont need scope...so im just feeling that they need a slight price rise. the awp i wouldnt care about the price rise too much, but 1 that high you must be joking...5000 max imho.



the tmp/mac10/elites i would welcome a change as they are some of my faveourite guns, its just annoying when im the onyl one using them cos everyone else is out for 'l33tness' instead of fun...



EDIT:



just read the above changes from the initial news, YES to the new prices, i see no problem with those whatsoever except possibly take the AK to 2900 instead, and the awp shouldnt really be 5 in a clip.....especially if a clip is still to cost the same amount, i tend to reload after every 2 shots or so anyways, so 5 per clip isnt a problem...as long as the cost is halved.