VAC pwnz teh Joolz nub gj Valve.
Joolz Retires
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
exwhyze wrote..
I think what RiceBowl was getting at is that it would be cool if it came by default when you installed CS. That way everyone has it, like VAC modules.
Or they could make c-d be able to go in your command line and you could forget about forgetting to run it like me =)Comment
-
I'd like to ask joolz exactly what his intention was in writing this letter. I mean, yes, he apparently has coding skills which proves him to be of intelligence in at least that department, but I found his letter rather simplistic and unrefined.
He's right about someone coming along and taking his place, cheating is everywhere, in everything humans do, but even he points out that it is time for him to focus on real life. It's a game, meant to be enjoyed, and regardless of his intentions behind his hacking, his life is obviously lacking something of true value and meaning. If hacking was that important to him, he would never give it up.
I bet joolz is just a lady magnet isn't he?Comment
-
Simplex wrote..
What if in my software agreement, I have users agree to give up the second/forth/sixth amendment rights? I tell the ATF of this and the ATF raids the house. They take all the guns, and detain you without charge for 20 years.
In response to all 3 of the quotes above, the EULA (End User License Agreement) is a binding legal contract.
EULA's have yet to be proven in court.Also technically, cheats are illegal under the DMCA (In the USA ONLY). Circumventing security measures makes them illegal to have, use, or create. The EULA makes them illegal to use. So in a way, it's doubly-illegal.
Circumventing encryption methods that would aid in the theft of copyrighted material is what the DMCA covers. And personally I don't think we need any other DMCA cases.thrombose wrote..
Guns cost money, aren't given away, require background checks, and have legitimate uses like security. Guns are also a neccessary part of modern society (security, police, army, etc.). I don't think cheats fall within any of these classifications.
RIZZUH, what about all the arms dealers? People can buy weapons and guns, and use them at their own free will. It is up to them wheter they want to commit a crime or not.Comment
-
Simplex wrote..
Clearly, Simplex, you have never admin'd anything related to Half-Life. OGC was a superb tool for administrators trying to spot cheaters on their servers -- spectating with the wallhack tools made it easy to tell whether they were legit or not. Anyway...
Cheats have no real use other than cheating, which is wrong.Comment
-
An "open letter" to the community or "Why I've spent years ruining CS for players around the world" by Jewels:
Unfortunately, my mommy and daddy didn't give me the love and attention I so desperately needed growing up which caused me to hate myself and, as a result, compelled me to do something detestable to justify their behavior and rationalize my self-loathing.
What a waste.Comment
-
like any cracker/hacker, once youve proven youre superior to any countermeasures against you. theres no real need to continue.
and he pointed that out, after 6 months, VAC was still as susceptible as ever. hes already proved how successful he can be, he has no more to prove.Comment
-
you guys are fucking stupid
and i know everyones reading this, because of my uber sexy avatar
ill probobly get banned for this, but ill contribute
joolz didnt quit because hes too lazy to fight vac, rizzuh
he quit because its too easy to fight vac
you wont believe how incredibly easy it is to just hook a dll...its really funny actuallyComment
-
I like how everybody bashes this guy without really knowing naything about him or what he did. He was one of the highest profile crackers. He advocated cheater-only pubs as sort of a variant of counter-strike, he worked (a little) with UA, he participated in the first Counter-Hack Mole game and I don't know what else. As long as the chalenge exists people will try to get around the CS anti-cheats. Some people are really good at it, like Joolz, and I think we need more of these people to help with anti-cheats, the same way that business hire 'former' hackers to test their security systems. Joolz doesn't deserve any respect for his programs, which ruined CS experiences for all of us, but he deserves some for even trying to help out the AC community. If we set an example of "once a hacker always a hacker" then there's no incentive for coders to come back from the dark side and tell us what they've learned.Comment
-
rizzuh wrote..
Sorry you didn't get my point... You were talking about hurting a community, and its not the tools that hurts a community, neither the people who made the tools, but the people who uses them. Heck, you might say that he shouldn't have provided it in the first place. But cheating tools also have legitimate use such as an admin to see who's cheating.
Guns cost money, aren't given away, require background checks, and have legitimate uses like security. Guns are also a neccessary part of modern society (security, police, army, etc.). I don't think cheats fall within any of these classifications.simplex wrote..
SIMPLEX, a program that cracks another software isn't illegal, it even is copyrighted. But when you use it, it is illegal.
I am very anti-gun, so this surprises even me to say it, but your analogy is incorrect. If the world government said that guns were illegal (not certain uses of them), then your analogy might be closer. See, guns can be used for a multitude of legal uses. Clay shooting, (legal) hunting, rifle ranges, even the boy-scouts use guns legally.
Same thing might apply to a cheating tool.Comment
-
Cheats in CS have been around since I started playing (Beta 5.0). The first cheats were lambert -1.01, who doesn't remember that or gl_zmax the first ever wall hack for Half-Life. Then there were all of these things where you could have big bars coming off the enemy and it allowed you to see when they were coming around walls. Eventually when they wouldn't allow people to alter models anymore, wall hacks came around. Who doesn't remember Chazz and all the rest. There were so many hackers before Joolz, he's not the first and not the last. Every hacker who has left HL has left their source behind, except Chazz did the best way of leaving which screwed over my friend's comp. He released a God Mode Hack which was actually a virus that would delete your whole computer, good stuff. Anyway, if Joolz was never a hack writer, there would have been someone else. So there's no reason to bash him to hell that he ruined CS with his hacks. CS has had hacks before 98% of the current CS community started to play.Comment
-
stooopid wrote..
Are you a FRIGGING RETARD? I didn't believe people could be this stupid, but wow, he proved me wrong. You truly are sir, the dumbest thing to ever walk this earth. Your statement is so unbelievable.... Ok, I'll stop there. Not worth my time anyways :-P
Clearly, Simplex, you have never admin'd anything related to Half-Life. OGC was a superb tool for administrators trying to spot cheaters on their servers -- spectating with the wallhack tools made it easy to tell whether they were legit or not. Anyway...Comment
-
I also call bullshit on EULAs being binding contracts. I believe the legal term would be "No fucking way in hell".
If Valve had talked to me, if UA had trusted me, blah blah blah. He sure took the initiative there, didn't he? Is he so retarded that he expects either party to look favorably on him without massive effort on his part? And how is it that he has respectable skills when he constantly bitches about how pathetic VAC is? It's like being called "maestro" when you can play chopsticks.
What, exactly, has he proved single-handedly? That VAC is half-assed and a 5 year-old engine based on 6 and 7 year-old engines is full of holes? Did anyone here NOT know that already? Seems to me that if he really wanted to accomplish something, he would've revolutionized anti-cheats instead of hopping on his dead steed and "proving" that current anti-cheats are primitive.
Jesus christ, felix. What the fuck is wrong with you?Comment
Comment