Mystic Monk wrote..Mice.
LONG LIVE BALL MOUSES!!!!11
rev: dual optical
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
zimzap wrote..
hey not everybody is rich, and would spend 50$ on a mouse, i spent 20$ on my logitec optical mouse with the red bottom with the light, and i see no problems with it. the worst thing that it does is the cord can be short thats it
AGain I say its only 50 bucks that is nothing.Comment
-
B2K_J_McClane wrote..
I agree McClane, I also bought the MDO and returned it shortly therafter to return to my explorer 3.0 MUCH, MUCH easier to aim in CS, and just as accurate everywere else including art-based programs. (I use Photoshop extensively)
I actually got the mouse man dual yesterday and played with it overnight. I ended up returning it because I find aiming to be much easier with my intelliMouse explorer 3.0.
The dpi rating is double the explorer but to be honest I think they both track just as smooth.Comment
-
i think ball mice are the best.. you actually have a feel for the way the mouse moves..its more predictable than the fancy opticals, , i still have the 4 year old mouse that came with my computer, and it still does the job better than the intelli explorerAdded @ [time="1021426360"]
i just read the article.., damn you and your advertising ways, rizz :PComment
-
I've got both the MS Optical Explorer 3.0 and the MDO. I love the MDO very much; and the only downfall is the lack of button support in HL if your using the Mouseman drivers.
The Optical Explorer does have a better readings per second rating; but I run at a very high sensitiviy in CS (22.1 sens) and when you have a 6k readings per second the mouse goes nuts. And with the problems with the buttons being placed too close together so that you hit th wrong ones (thumb/pinky buttons).
The MDO's buttons are placed nicely; and the thumb button is in a great place.
---
If your looking for 'the best mouse' then don't buy either of them; spend your cash on a Boomslang 2000. They may not be optical; but they kick very much ass. :PComment
-
Seriously, you can't say that if you want a mouse you have to go with optical. Sure, I'm happy with my MS Intellimouse Optical, but what about the Razer Boomslang 1000/2000, the ultimate ball mouse?
Too bad the 2000 costs $100, something I simply won't spend on a mouse. Maybe if I could get it for $50. My Intellimouse is all fine and dandy, but it freezes for some reason during CS ever since I installed XP. Too bad the Boomslang doesn't have XP drivers yet, either.Comment
Comment