California state Senator, Leland Yee, has essentially said that gamers have no right to defend themselves from the absolute asinine allegations being thrown around by people like him when it comes to violence and the cause of it.
And it's about ignorant people like Yee trying to find a scapegoat when it comes to violence and gun violence.
Yee is no stranger to trying to attack video games. In 2005 he helped write California state bill AB1179 which would "require violent games to be labeled as specified and would prohibit the sale or rental of those violent video games, as defined, to minors." Failure to abide by the bill would have resulted in fines of up to $1,000 per violation. That bill was overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States.
IGN also notes of yet another Senator, Connecticut's Christopher Murphy who is trying to again pin the Sandy Hook lunatic's actions on video games. He says, "there's a question as to whether (he) would have driven in his mother's car in the first place if he didn't have access to a weapon that he saw in video games that gave him a false sense of courage about what he could do that day."
Since video games are the only places where things like this are taught, I'm wondering why these wonderful people aren't also blaming racing games for reckless driving. Or how Mario taught kids to jump on turtles for points and eat random mushrooms to "grow big and strong." And Pong? Well damn, that game made me a professional tennis star.
Seriously, isn't it about time these guys finally pulled their heads out of their asses?
"Gamers have got to just quiet down. Gamers have no credibility in this argument. This is all about their lust for violence and the industry’s lust for money. This is a billion-dollar industry. This is about their self-interest."
And it's about ignorant people like Yee trying to find a scapegoat when it comes to violence and gun violence.
Yee is no stranger to trying to attack video games. In 2005 he helped write California state bill AB1179 which would "require violent games to be labeled as specified and would prohibit the sale or rental of those violent video games, as defined, to minors." Failure to abide by the bill would have resulted in fines of up to $1,000 per violation. That bill was overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States.
IGN also notes of yet another Senator, Connecticut's Christopher Murphy who is trying to again pin the Sandy Hook lunatic's actions on video games. He says, "there's a question as to whether (he) would have driven in his mother's car in the first place if he didn't have access to a weapon that he saw in video games that gave him a false sense of courage about what he could do that day."
Since video games are the only places where things like this are taught, I'm wondering why these wonderful people aren't also blaming racing games for reckless driving. Or how Mario taught kids to jump on turtles for points and eat random mushrooms to "grow big and strong." And Pong? Well damn, that game made me a professional tennis star.
Seriously, isn't it about time these guys finally pulled their heads out of their asses?
Comment