Eliminate the claymore from the sniper kit. This is needed because snipers have turned into front line assault troops now. You have seen it may times. They run around and drop the claymore for easy no brain, no skill kills. I am not knocking the sniper class. I thought snipers belong behind the lines, hidden, so they can kill at long range.
A simple solution to the claymore problem
Collapse
X
-
Re: A simple solution to the claymore problem
that doesnt make any sense, might as well remove everything else too.Comment
-
Re: A simple solution to the claymore problem
Originally posted by Sir. BladesWhen in doubt, NERF!!!!!!!
This is the kind of mentality that I hate in BF2. It is what killed the BH.
BH wouldve been fine if they would have buffed the other transport...
But more significantly its what bent over the assault class.
Hint to support players "Spread'em wide" it hurts.Comment
-
Re: A simple solution to the claymore problem
The fact that the Sharqi TV station may as well be marked uncappable now, that half of Warlord's points are now clay spammed to death, and many city maps are plagued by rambo claymore snipers.Originally posted by unununiumWhat exactly is the claymore problem? They limited the number of claymores to 2.
The claymore problem won't be fixed until they turn friendly fire back on them, either by default, or permanently. That or make FF off on them make them just detonate on anyone but only damage enemies.Comment
-
Re: A simple solution to the claymore problem
OK, and while were at it how about we take away the assault kits gun, because it is just SO unfair! While were at it lets give the Abrams the ability to fly because teh planes are so cheEpxors!!1!1 OMGz!1!!!!LOLZ!!!!
Thats the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Without the claymore, knifers are going to be slicing snipers a new butthole every 2 minutes. Make the claymores destructible, now thats a good idea. Suggesting that they should be removed altogether makes you look like an idiot.Comment
-
Re: A simple solution to the claymore problem
Your self centered reply indicates that you think snipers belong on the front lines assaulting. Your reply was very lame.Originally posted by ARC|NoodlesOK, and while were at it how about we take away the assault kits gun, because it is just SO unfair! While were at it lets give the Abrams the ability to fly because teh planes are so cheEpxors!!1!1 OMGz!1!!!!LOLZ!!!!
Thats the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Without the claymore, knifers are going to be slicing snipers a new butthole every 2 minutes. Make the claymores destructible, now thats a good idea. Suggesting that they should be removed altogether makes you look like an idiot.
Snipers do not belong in the front lines do they? When snipers are using claymores to protect them selfs that is fine. They are using them now to assault the enemy for no brain no skill kills.
Maybe you should read my complete thread and try to comprehend what I
and saying.Comment
-
Re: A simple solution to the claymore problem
Hey I am a Canadian sniper and it go"s like this one shot one kill. the only thing I can say is that they played with the ordinaces like c4 you cann't use it like before and now how they did it with the c4. Now they do it with claymores. You can still put more then two if you are lucky but only get claymore kills for two at a time but if three where hit in time. Number 3 comes up kill. just as if you had died and he hit it.
We act as Recon for Commander in the field or just find a place to hid and wait for the enemys to come by and Bang head shot if you can.Comment
Comment