Low vs High Settings :Pictures:

[IntensivCareBear]

Re: Low vs High Settings :Pictures:

HEHEHEHee, i got everything on high. resolution on 1600x1200 and i'm still the first on every map. whahahah i rule...

what settings? you cant run on high or even medium at that high res with a 9800 XT....

thats like me saying I RUN EVERYTHING ON SUPER HIGH 10 SECOND LAOD TIME YAYA FOR ME AHHA SUPRE HIGH RES, EXCEPT I HAVE A CARD 9800 THAT HAS NO HOPE IN HELL OF ACTUALLY DOING IT!

[bitvomit]

Re: Low vs High Settings :Pictures:

Can you guys start posting .PNG's? JPEGs just plain suck ass and degrade the color quality.

[Thirdeyez]

Re: Low vs High Settings :Pictures:

I run on Med/High
All med expect Text. high, View 100% and 2xAA.

Ive noticed its possible nwo to lose enmies in shadows, which sucks.
On full high I get to 62% loading then it crashes..which also sucks.
But I got a pretty crap system.
Pentium 4 3.4
2gig Ram
ATI Nvidia 6800 vanilla (cant be OC'd)

Ive played on all high on a friends comp. looks completely similar to my med/high settings..so meh fine with me.
Im gonna reduce my shadow stuff tho, I hate dieing to F'ers in the shadows...its the damn alley's in karkland man!! I never knew they were dark!

[imported_madness]

Re: Low vs High Settings :Pictures:

You guys like longer load times ? :P
I have 1024x, 2xAA, LOW..better FPS and faster loading

[r0uJe]

Re: Low vs High Settings :Pictures:

let's not forget the video card drivers also help a lot (not just the in-game video options)...

[Garabaldi]

Re: Low vs High Settings :Pictures:

ATI Nvidia 6800 vanilla

Well that's a uqnique card..