Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Digital-Boy

    #31
    Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

    SF gun significantly better than core-game gun?

    F2000: Not especially
    G36E: Yes
    G36K: Don't know, haven't used it
    MG36: Partially (PKM balances it out)
    SCAR-H: Not especially (it's functionally similar to the F2000)
    MP7: No (it's a watered down carbine)
    SCAR-L: No (many people consider this to be strictly worse than the G36C)

    Comment

    • WolfAlmighty
      Artillery Magnet
      • Jan 2007
      • 2113

      #32
      Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

      Originally posted by [DUCKS]Black_Duck_1
      The scope in the F2000 is not of a great importance to me. and BTW the scope wont give you really a better accuracy (look at the numbers!), it just helps you aim better.
      It should also be noted that the 'scope' on the F2000 is, in fact, worse than the other ARs. The crosshair-type ironsight is nice, but the zoom factor on the F2000 is less than that of the other ARs (it has a zoom factor of .7, while the M16, G3, AK101, AK-47 have .6, allowing you a better zoom...the G36E has a .7 also and the L85 has .4, but those are medic guns so I guess they wouldn't really factor in to this argument).

      ~Wolfgang

      Comment

      • F-1

        #33
        Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

        Originally posted by 2000sDigitalBoy
        SF gun significantly better than core-game gun?

        F2000: Not especially
        G36E: Yes
        G36K: Don't know, haven't used it
        MG36: Partially (PKM balances it out)
        SCAR-H: Not especially (it's functionally similar to the F2000)
        MP7: No (it's a watered down carbine)
        SCAR-L: No (many people consider this to be strictly worse than the G36C)

        you cannot use any of the G36K or SCAR-H in vanilla bf2.

        Comment

        • Digital-Boy

          #34
          Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

          Originally posted by [DUCKS]Black_Duck_1
          you cannot use any of the G36K or SCAR-H in vanilla bf2.
          I know, but I thought I'd mention them anyway as the MEC, insurgents, and Spetsnaz all use vanilla-BF2 weapons (barring the RPG-7V).

          Comment

          • Sir. Shpox

            #35
            Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

            Originally posted by [DUCKS]Black_Duck_1
            G3 has a higher damage than the F2000.
            AK variants have similar/better accuracy.... a little bit more damage
            They all have the same fire rate. So how come the F2000 is better?
            You haven't taken into account the number of bullets a gun has, yes the G3 aquires more damage as that graph of yours shows but not everyone is perfect at aiming. You have to take into account the other factores, eg the f2000 comes with a GL. Damage wise it isn't but I'm sure most will prefer the f2000 over the G3. . Also I was speaking generally as a person from my point of view.

            Comment

            • coco

              #36
              Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

              Originally posted by Wolfgang Abenteuer
              It should also be noted that the 'scope' on the F2000 is, in fact, worse than the other ARs. The crosshair-type ironsight is nice, but the zoom factor on the F2000 is less than that of the other ARs (it has a zoom factor of .7, while the M16, G3, AK101, AK-47 have .6, allowing you a better zoom...the G36E has a .7 also and the L85 has .4, but those are medic guns so I guess they wouldn't really factor in to this argument).

              ~Wolfgang
              The sights on the F2000 are much more user friendly, the "zoom" isnt as powerful as other AR's but at least you have clear vision with its full cross sights.

              Comment

              • Light_Wolf

                #37
                Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

                A while ago I unlocked the g36e for my medic, and started to play vanilla BF on Karkand. I was a mediocre player before, I stil am My kill rate has improved some, but in the end it all comes down to the player with the most skill. I can pwd a n00b with the pistol, even if he wields the g63e

                Comment

                • Moke

                  #38
                  Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

                  Those who genuine annoyed by SF guns should just go and do the account trick.... fair game for all, and no raging

                  Comment

                  • jdrou
                    Member
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 1860

                    #39
                    Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

                    Originally posted by shpox
                    You have to take into account the other factores, eg the f2000 comes with a GL.
                    Yes, this is probably its best feature. If I ever do the "trick" to get the unlocks it would be mainly for this gun. It is a definite upgrade over the M16A2 (since I hate the burst fire) but I'd still prefer the AKs for MEC/China. G36E looks like a nice upgrade over the M16A2 and L85 but I'd also prefer the AKs over all of them. I don't see any real advantage to the MG36 over any of the stock LMGs (except maybe the Type 95) or the PKM. SCAR doesn't look like much of an upgrade over the G36C or QBZ-97 either.

                    Comment

                    • ColonGlock

                      #40
                      Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

                      Whether they are more powerful or not, SF weapons should be limited to SF servers. It was a underhanded move. I will continue to play, but will look out for some cool mods were everyone is on a level playing field.

                      Comment

                      • Sir. Shpox

                        #41
                        Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

                        They should be but it was pretty obvious.

                        Imagine you are Ea.

                        Make the game more ******** or make a heap of money ? You pick.

                        Comment

                        • FusioN[90thSFG]

                          #42
                          Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

                          The only reason EA did this is to "force" people into buying SF. Someone get every news channel to say "EA, go phuck yourselves until you get upset about not having any type of genitals." I haven't played BF2 online since the patch since I get the "We are doing this to waste your time, please reinstall your games because we are lying to you that you have modified content in your BF2 files, see you in 2 hours.|_()()$3R" And I am getting a new computer in... 12 days it is now I believe, so I won't bother to reinstall BF2 in the meantime.. REMEMBER... EA IS 99% MONEY HUNGRY 1% COMMUNITY(Meaning patches/fixes/support/customer service, which I may add EA has none of those, they call these "things" so called "patches" but you know what they are? They are just little things called spyders and silverware minus the ders and silver..

                          Comment

                          • ConscriptVirus
                            Member
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 6369

                            #43
                            Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

                            nah..only the gl outmatchesme but then again theres the gp30 an m203

                            Comment

                            • DavidG64

                              #44
                              Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

                              Originally posted by 2000sDigitalBoy
                              SF gun significantly better than core-game gun?

                              MP7: No (it's a watered down carbine)
                              Why do you think this? At medium range a watered down carbine is significantly better than a shotgun.

                              Comment

                              • DavidG64

                                #45
                                Re: Anyone else feel SF guns own regular guns?

                                Originally posted by FusioN[90thSFG]
                                Someone get every news channel to say "EA, go phuck yourselves until you get upset about not having any type of genitals."
                                If I had that kind of power over the news channels I hope I could find something more important to say. :p

                                Comment

                                Working...