Battlefield M203

[MrChris_CJ]

Re: Battlefield M203

hey just need to take off more points when a noob n00b tubes himself

[Justified]

Re: Battlefield M203

Which is why each kill I see with the G3 makes me that much prouder for the BF2 community.

~Wolfgang

You're welcome and glad to be of service knocking down the enemy with my G3. :)

~wOw~Justified

[PsychoticPikachu]

Re: Battlefield M203

If they increased the splash damage there would be less bunny hopping as those people would kill themselves everytime and their score would not increase either; 2 + -2 = 0.

That... would be bad. People wouldn't use it up close, but if you make the splash damage any worse, that thing is going to become a freaking mortar.

However... if the M203 required a direct hit to kill anyone... that would be much different...

[Solid Knight]

Re: Battlefield M203

That... would be bad. People wouldn't use it up close, but if you make the splash damage any worse, that thing is going to become a freaking mortar.

However... if the M203 required a direct hit to kill anyone... that would be much different...

Well up close is where the problem lies. Nobody has a problem with people blasting them from far away mainly because most people aren't able to intentionally do that. It's when you're four feet from each other and he jumps in the air, shoots the ground and kills you yet doesn't die from the blast which would realistically rip him to pieces, that is where the problem lays.

Direct hits only from the grenade would completely defeat the purpose of the grenade. You'd essentially have an underbarrel 1700's style cannon*.

*The balls do not explode in these kinds of cannons it is bascially like an over-sized bullet.

[imported_DKP-Orkan]

Re: Battlefield M203

If they increased the splash damage there would be less bunny hopping as those people would kill themselves everytime and their score would not increase either; 2 + -2 = 0.

I have always missed the mortars.

[jayhigh]

Re: Battlefield M203

I will admit it.
I am a M203 whore.
I resort to the M16 when I have no more grenade rounds.
those getting whore'd, do not cry to me.
When I say Jump, you say "HOW HIGH?"

lol
I just got the PKM unlock, I want to try to whore it up with it.
I managed to get a kill streak of 17 with it...
more to come..

[gungho]

Re: Battlefield M203

I've been waiting for someone to post this for so long, I can't believe you're the first one to bring up this issue!

There is usually a new thread on this every 2 or 3 weeks, try the SEARCH button

[moocifer]

Re: Battlefield M203

There is usually a new thread on this every 2 or 3 weeks, try the SEARCH button

I hope you're joking as I already told the other guy that I was sarcastic.

/I love the nade launcher

[gungho]

Re: Battlefield M203

I hope you're joking as I already told the other guy that I was sarcastic.

What ? Read all the other posts in this thread :laugh:

[rombaft]

Re: Battlefield M203

I use the M203 a lot, maybe I am even a M203whore .
But I didn't use the dam thing for like 250 hours, but when on karkand I got constantly owned by the G30 or M203 I started using it and liking it a lot.

Just the game pal

[PNHcanuck]

Re: Battlefield M203

close range 203ers are just scared they die in a gun fight so they have to bring out their noob tubes.. If their scared then they should stay away from the internet..

[JoeJJohnsonII]

Re: Battlefield M203

I had someone that was a n00b tuber bring up some points that made me think twice (I still think its a bad weapon). He told me that he only uses the tuber when he is USMC because he cant kill close range with the m16. Everytime he uses the m16 close range he dies from the guy opening up full auto on him, so he opted for the cheaper tactic. He uses the m16 at longer range because it is so accurate, but the damage isnt anything to get excited over. Basically what he said he wanted to see was the accuarcy tuned down a bit and the damage uped a bit. It almost makes since to me because I also hate the m16. I dont like its burst or its lousy damage. It's most liekly because I suck, but I also keep finding myself dead when I go against another assault (or medic) at close range. Just something I heard and wanted to throw out there.

[King Cockery]

Re: Battlefield M203

Well assault kit without the nade launcher would unbalance the kits. My suggestion would be that they would make different kits for different maps like they did in BFV.

[CS-Evolution]

Re: Battlefield M203

The ROF on the M16 is no excuse to resort to the M203 at close range (although I don't object to so-called M203 "whoring"). I've found that if you can hit your fire key fast enough, the ROF on the M16 often blows the full-auto AK-101 and AK-47 out of the water. I find the reload time on the M203/GP30 to be WAY too slow to be an effective close combat weapon on city maps. It's good for one or two kills with the first shot, but after that... you pretty much have to use your rifle until you can find enough cover to reload.

Bottom line though is don't hate the player, hate the game. I know, bad cliche. But once DICE determines there is an imbalance, they will most likely fix it. If the statistics show that the grenade launchers do not account for a disproportionately high number of kills, they probably aren't going to do anything about it though.

[PNHcanuck]

Re: Battlefield M203

Still a noobish fighting style..