BF2 SUCKS Compared to Desert Combat

[Thameth]

What is it with people and heli controls on BFV and BF2. Problem I reckon is people have played DC for way to long that they don't want to learn new controls when most people who have learnt the new controls are loving them.

Its mainly because DC chopper were very difficult to fly and had a loooong learning curve. But once you learned how to fly them correctly it was very rewarding and put you above the noobs.

BFV and BF2 pretty much brought a very noob friendly way to fly choppers and pissed off all the people that took weeks to figure out the DC choppers. Plus even though the DC chopper controls where rigged plane controls they flew much more realistically than BFV and BF2 choppers.

[shadow_wolf]

Its mainly because DC chopper were very difficult to fly and had a loooong learning curve. But once you learned how to fly them correctly it was very rewarding and put you above the noobs.

BFV and BF2 pretty much brought a very noob friendly way to fly choppers and pissed off all the people that took weeks to figure out the DC choppers. Plus even though the DC chopper controls where rigged plane controls they flew much more realistically than BFV and BF2 choppers.

they were far more responsive, thats what I miss. Also the crosshair on the hud actually served a purpose

[imported_Fusion]

sigh...If you dont like the United States of America why dont you just leave? or why not complain and ask for a change and if enough people do complain, then they will fix the problem!

Hah, listen to yourself. Maybe you will find yourself funny too.

[Retribution.]

maybe because it's not DC? :P

[Thameth]

maybe because it's not DC? :P

But you see thats the problem. When EA bought Trauma alot of people were lead to believe that BF2 would basically become an official DC2.

Yes BF2 if freakin great, but alot of us wished it would have kept or implemented more of DC or the idea's from DC into it.

[DeathFromAbove]

Desert combat was cool but... I still think BF2 is better, I fall in love with a game if it's guns look cool and I think the guns and the sights look bad @$$ in BF2.

[Solar71]

DICE is a sweedish company ?
OH NO!!!
we are DOOMED!!!
hahaha

[iNiM]

yeh, we will come and get you all some day ^^

[dark-eye]

I would agree with you if PoE wasnt a mod for BFV. If it was a BF1942 mod and not tainted by BFV then it may be better. The thing is though DC had more vehicles and everything worked smoother.

point is PoE is being developed for BF2 as we speak and i do not agree with you it was "tainted"by BFV it made a game i regret buying to some of the best gaming experiences ive had. seconds thing is PoE workt fine ok DC did have more vehicles but things like the dual seated planes, smoke grenades for tanks were first implented in PoE. last but not least is that the BFV engine did have one advantage: the under- and overgrowth enabled osme great maps (though they were for total-war, which finetuned a lot that even PoE couldnt get to work properly)

[jayhigh]

Point Of Existance All The Way! And Beyond..

[imported_Chubz]

Yeah yeah, I know, the game is absolutely perfect. Everything is just right the way it is. What's funny is how assclowns like yourself will say things are still perfect when they get changed by each new patch. It's always perfect. Whatever is, is best.

Get the hell out of here you EA fanboi.

He wasn't saying it was perfect, he was saying that he disagreed with what you were saying and that he thinks the game is fine the way it is as of now.

I agree with him, especially on issues like the binoculars.... dude... what the hell would binoculars be good for when you've already got a commander placing UAV scanners all over the map, etc. ? That'd be practically useless.

Just because everybody doesn't agree with you doesn't mean you have to soil your panties.

[alextaylor29]

I agree with the very first poster. Except for prettier graphics DC was and still is a much better game.

[-={DAC}MI7]

It took a whle to perfect DC, the balance will come, it will just take time, DC.6 the VSS whorage if i remeber.. 1 shot anywhere.. and it went on, they would make something crap and then somthing rediculously good, DC Final ended on Saiga whorage...
I agree, they need to scrap the artiallry the commander has and use some kind of mobile artillary, and the commander spots the target or somthin...
I prefer DC to BF2.. but BF2 is growing on me, i loved the Infantry in DC, ( was ranked 1st on sea rigs for months :P)
But the m203-whorage has got very bad.. cant have a decent round of infatry play anymore without some n00bs aiming at your feet and blowing you up..
I fight fire with fire...

blah blah... lol

[sturmvogel]

Then go back to DC you nerd... quit *****ing

[[uBp]Irish]

to make the perfect Desert American/Enemy Game type between BF2 and DC take the following..

take out commander mode... cause it's stupid... (replace with MLRS in DC cause it was good)
BF2 graphics (cause they wtfpwnwitha10ftstick DC graphics)
BF2 kits (not the dmg.. the kits)
Bf2 Jets (Because face it... locking on makes it a sh*tload easier to kill enemies than having to line up the missles and lead the target... which we all should be doing anyways)
DC Helos (cause we all know how hard they were to learn, and how rewarding it was once we learned)
BF2 & DC Maps (Take out all the chinese maps and leave the mec v usmc + classic maps like El Al and Desert Shield.)
DC ground vehicles +DC Helos ( Tanks/ground vehicles/helo's > BF2 vehicles imo)
DC Gameplay (in relation to bullet dmg and what not)



put that allllll together in a nice little hat and toss it around and you'll have one bad a$$ game.