I want the A-10 Warthog

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • glasseye

    #31
    Originally posted by Republican
    Huh??
    haha its fixed. reading it called the minigun so much i screwed up and did it too. or did i?
    no, no i didnt. i made no mistake and there is nothing to see here! move along!

    Comment

    • Biggs_[CV]

      #32
      First of all we have enough planes already. And the damn things are hard enough to shoot down by ground forces already. The A-10 would be ok if the ground forces are also given a way to counter it. If the aircraft in the game dominate every map all the time its no fun for ground forces, if thats the case we might as well just play a flight sim.

      Comment

      • Republican

        #33
        The real A-10 is near invincable. It would be the BH of aircraft. But I don't care, I want realism, and realism means the US kicks all ass all the time.

        Comment

        • glasseye

          #34
          that would explain why vietnam and korea were such resounding successes.

          Comment

          • Republican

            #35
            Korea was. I don't see one Korea, I see 2. That's just what we wanted to do.. Protect the S.Koreans from the invading N.Koreans.

            Revoulitionary war- 1-0
            War of 1812 2-0
            Sp-Am war 3-0
            Cival War 4-0
            WW1 5-0
            WW2 6-0
            Korea 7-0
            Vietnam 7-1
            Kosovo 8-1
            Gulf War One 9-1
            Gulf War Two 10-1

            I'd say that's a pretty good record

            Comment

            • glasseye

              #36
              Originally posted by Republican
              Korea was. I don't see one Korea, I see 2. That's just what we wanted to do.. Protect the S.Koreans from the invading N.Koreans.

              Revoulitionary war- 1-0
              War of 1812 2-0
              Sp-Am war 3-0
              Cival War 4-0
              WW1 5-0
              WW2 6-0
              Korea 7-0
              Vietnam 7-1
              Kosovo 8-1
              Gulf War One 9-1
              Gulf War Two 10-1

              I'd say that's a pretty good record
              surely you mean north invading the south? or do you mean south invading the north, comrade?

              i dont understand your scoring system though. also why did you include the civil war? thats like losing to yourself at solitaire.

              Comment

              • Republican

                #37
                Originally posted by glasseye
                surely you mean north invading the south? or do you mean south invading the north, comrade?

                i dont understand your scoring system though. also why did you include the civil war? thats like losing to yourself at solitaire.
                We would have lost the cival war if the south won.

                How do you not understand? Every time we win we get +1 to our win colum...

                Comment

                • Biggs_[CV]

                  #38
                  While I understand your scoring system Rep, I think the Civil War was a wash- no winner. Yes technically the North won. But any country that has that long and vicious a civil war has no winner. Also Kosovo was by no means a war as compared to the others listed.

                  Comment

                  • glasseye

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Republican
                    We would have lost the cival war if the south won.
                    a civil war is a war where a country fights among itself yes? the south was america too right? so no matter the outcome, america would have won?

                    you really should define what you mean by 'win' and by 'war' if you are going to arbitrarily score them like that. is win beating the other side or simply not being utterly destroyed? is a war anything w/ war in the name or only what you decide to call a war?

                    revoulitionary war- america seceded from britain. thats a win for america.
                    war of 1812- loss, at best a stalemate.
                    sp-am war- win.
                    cival war- hardly counts as both sides were america.
                    WW1- iim not sure if you were taught this, but world war one wasnt called thaat because america was the only country fighting.
                    WW2- see above.
                    korea- korea was a loss, stalemate at best.
                    vietnam- vietnam was a loss.
                    kosovo- kosovo was a NATO action. america is not NATO.
                    gulf war one- although led by the us, the gulf war was a UN action.
                    gulf war two- you mean the invasion of iraq right? america may have started it but is relying on the rest of the world to bail it out.

                    you watch too many movies.

                    Comment

                    • Republican

                      #40
                      I can tell this isn't gunna go anywhere... I tend to think if you're part of a team and your team wins, that means you've won also, but whatever... Let's droop it and move on.

                      Comment

                      • Thelron

                        #41
                        If you want to get really technical, the southerners are probably more correct with their "War Between the States" line than the term Civil War, as a fully-functioning nation had been founded before the initiation of hostilities. So, in a sense, you can chalk up a 'win' in the USA column even though it was two American forces fighting it out (at that time, there were two 'Americas' technically, but only one USA). I draw the line at 'War of Northern Aggression' though, that is about as sensible as the German claim that they were forced into WWI.

                        As for WWI and WWII (and the gulf wars), the US wasn't the only country fighting but if your team wins a game do you not count it as a time when you won?

                        1812- Victory through inferior firepower. We 'won' (after having half the country invaded and the capitol torched) because we weren't the big threat, so I'm with ya on scratching that off the list ;>)

                        -Also, nifty about the 'new' A-10s, I hadn't heard that there was a new model (I guess I just heard about the old ones going away and thought that was the end of 'em).

                        Comment

                        • glasseye

                          #42
                          of course it does. a-10 is sexy.

                          Comment

                          • -=B.A.=-nmbr1sniper

                            #43
                            so many mods to choose from..dont know what to pic

                            Comment

                            • glasseye

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Thelron
                              As for WWI and WWII (and the gulf wars), the US wasn't the only country fighting but if your team wins a game do you not count it as a time when you won?
                              yes you do. but you can hardly use it as a reason for saying you always win. that was my point.

                              Comment

                              • IVfluids

                                #45
                                You guys do realize this is a thread about the A10 lol, not the history of war?

                                Another google war, yay!!

                                Comment

                                Working...