Battlefield Play4free

[=MNKY=Frosty]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

If anyone's interested in a key, send me a message <3

[Corvic]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

i got into the play for free beta as well.

it is pretty bad. Heroes was more fun.

[Kylee!]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

you gotta be f***ing kidding me... i run mw2, crysis, and so many other games on high, and bfbc is just the one that i must run in low and still have ****ty fps. not even smooth, its just stutter everywere

i have a nvidia 130gt m 4gbram and a 2.66ghz

Yea it has to be drivers or something, my system is consistently worse than yours. I get at least a constant 30 FPS and above when not in much action.

[[Expletive Deleted]]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

BFBC2 runs poorly on my system, too.

I'm not on a laptop...

[CptainCrunch]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

One problem might be that BC2 is more CPU based and you are running it on a laptop. That or the video drivers need to be updated.

Crunch

[jimykx]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

Okay, well thats just a lie. I know I can't run Crysis on high at all with my 2.2 Ghz dual core and 9800GTX, but I can run BC2 at low graphics with some AA and still have it be pretty smooth (I always choose gameplay over graphics, so it could probably go higher).

you gotta be f***ing kidding me... i run mw2, crysis, and so many other games on high, and bfbc is just the one that i must run in low and still have ****ty fps. not even smooth, its just stutter everywere

i have a nvidia 130gt m 4gbram and a 2.66ghz

[Kylee!]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

its that they are bad optimized, i can run crysis on high with better fps and a mutch better looking game than i can run bfbc2 on low with 10 fps

Okay, well thats just a lie. I know I can't run Crysis on high at all with my 2.2 Ghz dual core and 9800GTX, but I can run BC2 at low graphics with some AA and still have it be pretty smooth (I always choose gameplay over graphics, so it could probably go higher).

[jimykx]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

its that they are bad optimized, i can run crysis on high with better fps and a mutch better looking game than i can run bfbc2 on low with 10 fps

[Vreki]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

****ty graphics? Besides Crysis, Bad Company 2 has the best graphics of any PC game.

Yes, I mean really? There might be better looking games, but there is nothing wrong with BC2 graphics.

[Anarchy1]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

****ty graphics? Besides Crysis, Bad Company 2 has the best graphics of any PC game.

[jimykx]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

BC2 is not that bad, just a brand new approach to battlefield. More "Counter-Strike" if you will. I know, I know, BF should remain BF.

But at least the graphics are a HUGE improvement! At least we know what they are capable of graphic wise.

i see bfbc graphics as a ****ty bad ported engine from consoles, slow as hell that could be mutch faster

[Amaranthuse]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

BC2 is not that bad, just a brand new approach to battlefield. More "Counter-Strike" if you will. I know, I know, BF should remain BF.

But at least the graphics are a HUGE improvement! At least we know what they are capable of graphic wise.

[Olympus]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

The Game is really Bad.
It seems like cartoon style.
Oh my god can anyone make a nice game?
Can anyone make a nice game?
A game for PC and no consoles?
Can anyone?
I love BF 1942 and BF2 guys ,but i think the next BF games are not in same level because EA intersting only for consoles.That is the reallity and for this reason iam not optimist about BF3 ,i think will be a medium level game (as BC2) with no interesting for Teamplay.

[stilla-killa]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

Well If DICE does drop the ball with BF3 then I hope there is another developer out there that can take their spot. I thought it was going to be Novalogic with their new one, Delta Force Angel Falls, but it looks like that one has been canceled as there has been no news on the game in 2 years. That or wait and see if consoles ever catch up to PCs.

[=MNKY=Frosty]

Re: Battlefield Play4free

Oh look this is a bad company 2 vs bf2 thread now, yay.

The way I look at it, BC2 kinda wants to be more realistic, especially with how the weapons handle and how your player moves, but then they don't allow you to lay down, which kinda goes against the whole thing. BC2 just feels like it's all underwater, everything feels slow, you run like you're in custard, you pull up your sights too slow etc etc. Maybe it's cause I am twitch kinda player, but BF2 allowed EVERY kind of gamer to be happy, if you wanted teamplay, you had your support and medic who can be immense team players (or engi's in tanks), if you wanted to play a twitch style game, there was infantry only along with the quick gamespeed. If you wanted to fly, GO FLY. etc etc It just seems that BC2 misses those hectic 64player moments with jets smashing into friendly choppers while you drive your buggy down a hill past 2 tanks and flatten a sniper.

in b4 rant, if bf3 doesn't have more than bf2 in terms what you can do, l will have lost all faith in DICE, and I hope that some day I can become a lead games designer and make a PROPER new bf2.