Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

[LunaTiK TunaLiK]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

This game is supposed to mimic a big push of a military force. This is something that every single war had more than it's fair share of. You are thinking of it as a 32vs32 which it actually isn't. These games are not intended to be a stalemate.

But we all cry for realism

This isn't true and there is hardly any room for realism in FPS gaming.

In fact what most people call realistic isn't even realistic. You get these "realistic" mods that are further from realism than the original game. Like soldiers who can't reload a gun and walk at the same time. I remember one popular "realistic" mod that everyone claimed was extremely realistic and if you shot an AK from the hip standing the first bullet would go somewhat straight the second would hit the floor 5ft in front of you and the 3rd would hit the ceiling 5ft in front of you. Then they make every single action take three times as many commands as other games

[The_Eliminator]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

Im still trying to figure out whether we are being trolled here :/

[=MNKY=Frosty]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

Im still trying to figure out whether we are being trolled here :/

oshi, you could be right.

[Kylee!]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

Im still trying to figure out whether we are being trolled here :/

... good point.

*leaves thread*

[The_Eliminator]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

I just cant understand why anyone would buy BC2 expecting it to be a slow paced game after all the marketing put it the other way and still have the nerve to claim that this GAME isnt like REAL warfare.

Its a troll.

[[13]VisciousDog]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

Yeah, I guess my point can be misslead to trolling if anyone enjoys twisting it up, then out of content. My apologies......I am enjoying BF:BC2, and I am very impressed at the features (I am like wow!..impressive graphics..."buildings falling, damage on buildings...etc..etc). My point is.....How much more can everyone handle fast paced shooters. I have problems keeping up, and so at my age (45), problems running around in a chaotic world, then I get pissed on by a team mate "Start fighting!". I even couldn't handle Counter Strike (when it came out) without getting sick. So, I am still waiting for that one, where we all can slow down, and work together. Ofp and Ofp/Resistance had that. I was even in a two hour plus (one round) game with 64 players (32 per side) attacking towns (5 towns). Players Would get lifted (to a destination in a Blackhawk using Teamspeak, who ever was on). In BF:BC2, these rounds are about 5 mins, then I say "Is that it?". Furthermore, in a real world not one person can run across (one end to other end) one of those maps in less than 3 mins if it for real. It would take a person approx 20 plus minutes (then out of breath, then including environments...for examples: Heat, winter...water...etc). Ever watch the person that got you? That guy appears to have been drinking 10 Redbulls. From all Bf games I have played BF:BC2 has slowed down gameplay, and I actually like it and impressed. Cant they slow it down some more? Would be nice. Their is realism in BF:BC2 that fps players request in the past, complaining. I have read those posts, but not wrote in em. The complaints of wrong sounds, weapon handling, and the worse I dislike, people want blood. I can really go without that. But even see how you kill your enemy in BFBC2. That is real enough. I got my 12x scope the other day, and tried it on a sniper rifle. Got close enough to defend a flag, but was at a distance. I shot one player in the head, and the reaction was graphic, as if though the bullet went through its head breaking the skull with blood splatter on other side, then slumping forward. I was like wow!...that is brutal. That is realism people been crying for. And if not, they will not pay for a game like this. So, I decided to stick to assault class...lmao.


Here is a video comparison from what is my pace of game play. Not to keen on 3rd person, or how the tactics were used.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2u5LYX_PHfo&feature=related

[jake_]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

[LunaTiK TunaLiK]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

man that video of arma makes me sick almost as much as bf:bc2.

These screen movements are getting worse and worse for good games. Give you this view that everything you are looking at is jumping around when you move. Please take your head and move it all around like you would if you were crawling on the ground and notice how everything is still and you can move your head on all kinds of directions but still stay focused on one single point. When they try to add this "realistic" head bob in video games you no longer can do that and it becomes even more unrealistic then just leaving it alone or not making it so bad.

[=MNKY=Frosty]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

troll be trolling us without knowing he's a troll.

[[13]VisciousDog]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

Alright...fine...I am a troll...(rolls eyes). I will accept it. See ya in BFBC2 game.

[[Expletive Deleted]]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

Looks like ARMA forgot one little detail about airborne ops. Well, more than one. Jumping out is really not that bad, and you don't spin every which way. If we spun around like that, our parachutes would cigarette roll and fail to open properly. Dirt dart time when that happens.

Also, the guy had his legs all spread apart when he hit. That's a sure fire way to get yourself hurt. There is a real reason we PLF when we jump with military chutes. They fall much faster than civilian chutes in order to prevent paras getting picked out of the sky.

Sure, this is totally off-topic. But it looks to me as if ARMA isn't quite as realistic as people say.

[[13]VisciousDog]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

Yeah, I am not to keen on the ArmA game. But can see how the pace of gameplay is slower compared to all Fps. I am sure everyone here has played some FPS that was way to quick for em. I have, and their was many of em. Fear to say some of these were the ones. "Doom, Tribes, tribes 2, Counter-Strike" These were some, that I got sick of (Headaches and such), and has to get rid of.

[Kylee!]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

Yeah, I am not to keen on the ArmA game. But can see how the pace of gameplay is slower compared to all Fps. I am sure everyone here has played some FPS that was way to quick for em. I have, and their was many of em. Fear to say some of these were the ones. "Doom, Tribes, tribes 2, Counter-Strike" These were some, that I got sick of (Headaches and such), and has to get rid of.

Well... you are 45. Do you think video game developers make games for people above the age of 25? No... why would they do that, there aren't nearly as many customers.

Although I always sucked at games like UT and Quake... CS is not thaat fast paced.

[iQue]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

Doom, Tribes, tribes 2, Counter-Strike

Man, those are some of my favourite games. :]

[idontcare]

Re: Sugar Rush, A, D, D...etc

This thread makes me want to chug some caffeine and go shoot visciousdog:)