General of the Army.......level 50?

[Lordsethonan]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

And this affects anybody exactly how? It's obvious for everybody he's stat padding, havin gthe big number one next to his name is worth nothing.

[[SA]4|1Lt.Fubar]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

It's not that it affects people. But some people enjoy fair play and dislike cheaters. In any game. It's the same as any discussion...it's a discussion. No different then guys sitting at a bar bitching about other things.

[Kingkat54]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

True,the points are meaningless except they do provide more weapons and more perks to the player. THAT is a huge advantage. The M416 is a better weapon, yes?
The fact that some people feel the need to stat-pad, or hack is just their need to feel competent. Their skills are not good enough to compete fairly, so they feel they are entitled to an advantage. That the hack somehow levels their playing field.
This discussion is good because many of us feel that the hackers ruin the game for many of us. But this DOES affect many players. ME in particular. I have fair skills, and I appreciate better players IF they play me w/o hacks. I can hold my own, but I will never be the best in any game. IF you feel the need to cheat against a player like me, then my only recourse is to not play at all, or find a clan, or server that provides protection from them. This shows we care about gaming, fair and balanced gaming.

[samchoc]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

Name Time -------------- Kills Headshots

EK-971 Vintovka 03h 06m 14s ----------- 200 189
XM8 Prototype 00h 30m 54s --------------- 101 101
F2000 Assault 00h 42m 55s -------------- 301 299
Stg.77 AUG 00h 08m 59s -------------- 106 105
AN-94 Abakan 00h 42m 22s ---------------- 340 338

kills:
25 753
Deaths:
279
K/D Ratio:
92.30


sure, lol its so freaking obvious even the fact that the actual best players(not the best ones but the most addicted and no lifers for sure) have almost the double of the timeplayed

Bu.Rogers GENERAL OF THE ARMY 50 Bu.Rogers 5 458 821 3 310 281 61h 07m 52s 25 753 279 92.30
PaglioSnarf COLONEL I 43 PaglioSnarf 3 728 505 65 650 683 91h 48m 32s 17 090 4 061 4.21
sh0w LIEUTENANT COLONEL II 41 sh0w 3 307 066 179 670 450 144h 45m 35s 13 550 4 481 3.02
Drhydro LIEUTENANT COLONEL I 40 Drhydro 3 071 785 236 010 372 185h 11m 57s 13 871 7 060 1.96

Without cheating i would like to see if he could kill me 92 times before i get to kill him once LOL
I would kick this cheaters *** sooooo bad !!

[Minmaster]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

luckily, nothing is really dependent on your rank like BF2 and BF2142 were (commander priority was given to higher ranks). so it doesn't really affect the game and so i don't care if they're lvl 50 or not.

[jimykx]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

Without cheating i would like to see if he could kill me 92 times before i get to kill him once LOL
I would kick this cheaters *** sooooo bad !!

Its a padstatter, not a cheater xD

[Highrisk]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

Its a padstatter, not a cheater xD

I'd say stat padding belongs in the field of cheating :P

[CaptainKirk]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

Back to the good ole days of bawwwing about padders. Keep it up.

[WolfAlmighty]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

I've always hated stat padders, and I always will. I've never been able to forgive them for the death of my boy.

[Minmaster]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

without global leaderboards, i bet many of these guys wouldn't bother stat padding. they're only doing it for attention, to be shown at top of the leaderboards.

[LunaTiK TunaLiK]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

I think he was calling him a cheater for the fact that he cheated the stat system.
*Apparently my browser must have been sitting in this thread and people have replied since then.

[signa]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

I wonder why EA didnt set a minimum number of players to start the round like they did in BF2. That would cut back on some padding.

[Lordsethonan]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

I wonder why EA didnt set a minimum number of players to start the round like they did in BF2. That would cut back on some padding.

It didn't stop him in previous games, they always find a way. I am more wary of hackers, since those you are more likely to face in a "real" server, even unranked ones; and there is very little you can do against a headshot hack.

stat padders won't play pub servers usually, they'll be confined to their own server, where they can set "their" rules; since facing any kind of real competition puts in evidence their lack of skill

[dfour]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

I wonder why EA didnt set a minimum number of players to start the round like they did in BF2. That would cut back on some padding.

I noticed this in the Beta but thought they would have implemented it in the actual retail product.

Make it 4 to stop dummy accounts and padding being able to start a game would be a sensible idea.

I still say the only reward he should get is all his stats reset to o and loose all his ranks/badges/pins and unlocks. It would serve him right :salute:

[ChemicalWarfare]

Re: General of the Army.......level 50?

I looked, one guy at 35 then all of a sudden, 50?? Look at his K/D ratio. Impossible. Trust me, he's has cheats or stats padding. I met this guy on BF2 also, he just padds, and he's the highest rank! n00b lol