This is the worst mp game i have ever played.I've played it for 4 hours total(multiplayer).I won the first match i played and a couple more after that.But all these dumb perks are the most annoying shiiite ever.Being able to melee someone from 5 feet away while speed running,while in a map that is the size of a shoebox.Wow,what fun.Whoever designed these lvls should be fired.I was led to believe there would be bigger maps,but that was a lie.Hackers,no server browser,hack-like perks on top of the already crappy game.Im selling this garbage to my buddy so he can give it to his 10 year old kid who might appreciate it more.Bad Company 2 pwns this peice of trash game.
-
-
Re: bad
If I had a dollar for each time someone claims that a game still in development "pwn" other games......
FFoW? ET:QW? -
Re: bad
it will be hard for you to sell the game to anyone as your key is linked with a steam account. I guess you could give the account away, but if you have other games you would ofcourse not do that.
I agree that some perks are very unbalanced like commando+lightweight+marathon. You can on some maps just run with the knife and pistol without problems. With everyone using GL's it can be very hard to have fun sometimes. Would have been nice with a promod for this game wouldn't it...Comment
-
Re: bad
Word. :nod:Originally posted by [IF]1|Sgt.Pierre-GC-
I reckon it could be possible if people could revert back to the version straight out of the box, and mess with the console? IDK.
But yeh, some perks just **** me off at just how over powered they are...Comment
-
Re: bad
+ rep, you are completely correct. Everyone believes BFBC2 will be this monster of a game...the same people thought that about MW2 before they dropped ded servers.Originally posted by Vreki
No one knows how good a game is UNTIL it is RELEASED. You can speculate but to say "This will kick its A$$" is merely an opinion and a shady one at that.
We should really have a mini forum titled "Rant" so people can vent their anger there, not here where we enjoy it.
I have to admit, i thought ET:QW would be great before i played it :shakehead: i was so wrong.Comment
-
Re: bad
Speaking purely from a pub players perspective ETQW had a great concept, unfortunately youre just way too reliant on other players. I found myself going for the objectives with 1-3 guys while everyone was content with with legalized statpadding (stacked teams, armor and vehicles focusing on kills in positions that dont benefit the assault, things like this). It ultimately broke the gameplay and the fun factor. In BF2, if your team is stupid and the opposition is stacked, you can still do something to have fun. No such thing in ETQW.Comment
-
Re: bad
MW2 is not that different from MW1 or WAW. Johnrondot has the same complaints as these games had as well. So am I correct to say that this is your first "new" CoD game?
CrunchTwitter: @CptainCrunch
Battlelog/Origin: CptainCrunchComment
-
Re: bad
Besides obviously problem servers. I havn't seen these problems. Maps seem alot bigger to me. Some maps suck, like Scrapyard but ones like Favela are great. There are perks to counter act other perks and stuff. Like cold blooded to stop heart beat sensors etc.Comment
-
Re: bad
How were you led to believe that?Originally posted by johnrondotComment
-
Re: bad
well, there was no perk that removed fall damage and gave you a 3m sword at the same time. There was no Unlimited Sprint, no scavanger, no ac130, no chopper gunner, etc... The new game is alot different then COD4. Didn't play much WAW but from the little I saw there was none of this in that game either.Originally posted by CptainCrunch
imo the perks were alot more balanced in COD4 then in MW2. I think that it would all work great if you were playing on XBox/PS3 with the slower pase and all the killstreaks but on a pc I atleast want fast gameplay. Having AC130's and choppergunners where you have to sit and hide in buildings just to survive is not good.
I guess that MW2 isn't balanced for PC :/Comment
-
Re: bad
Well, you could shoot them down instead of just hiding under the bed.Originally posted by [IF]1|Sgt.Pierre-GC-
In fact I think that MW2 handles killstreaks much better than COD4, since the rewards are no longer untouchable killing machines.Comment
-
Re: bad
Though there are these AC-130s and gunner seats, the maps have better cover. In cod4 you had nothing to get away from the aimbot chopper and shooting it down was difficult unless the server modified the chopper damage. You have perks that counter the killstreaks along with better weapons that lock on and take them down. On top of that you have better cover to hide behind. WAW had dogs that had to be killed or they would hunt you down. No way to get away from them other than to climb or fight.Originally posted by [IF]1|Sgt.Pierre-GC-
CoD4 and WAW have 3m swords without any perks or throwing capabilities. In fact in WAW it was so bad with bayonett jumping that they had to nerf it some. Though there are weapon attachments that detect or better see people, there are perks that help disable those. In CoD4 martyrdom and grenade spam was huge which I do not see near as much in MW2.
In my opinion MW2 is as much balanced as the other new cods. Yes, there are some overpowered things, but there are things that can be done to help, moreso than 4 had.
CrunchTwitter: @CptainCrunch
Battlelog/Origin: CptainCrunchComment
-
Re: bad
Saying that about BC2 wasnt really the point of my thread.I just think MW2 sucksOriginally posted by VrekiComment
-
Re: bad
no i've played cod since cod1....United Offensive was the best incarnation of this game imo.Originally posted by CptainCrunchComment
-
Re: bad
The BC2 beta has been released on PS3 for a good time now, so I don't think what he's saying is completely baseless. Regarding whether it's better than the single player on MW2, well, that's definitely still up in the air, but I imagine you can make some preliminary judgments on the PS3 beta of BC2 versus the multiplayer of MW2.Comment
Comment