9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

[ebevan_91]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

don't compare this to battlefield. smaller maps call for smaller capacity. i'm fine with 9v9.

My point exactly.

Smaller maps= smaller player count= Call of Duty.

Larger maps= larger player count= Battlefield.

[The_Eliminator]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

Yes but surely having an option to play a large scale battle in CoD should be given to us, just because it doesnt work on all maps doesnt mean they shouldnt let us do it. Look at shipment in CoD4, that was best played 4 vs 4 but you never saw it like that.

[RYKUU]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

My point exactly.

Smaller maps= smaller player count= Call of Duty.

Larger maps= larger player count= Battlefield.

So for it to be considered "Call of duty" , it can't have a high player count?
so a 32 Cod map is battlefield? i would much rather play a larger Cod map then go to battlefield.

[The_Eliminator]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

So for it to be considered "Call of duty" , it can't have a high player count?
so a 32 Cod map is battlefield? i would much rather play a larger Cod map then go to battlefield.

Exactly, by saying that any game 64 players is battlefield is saying that any game that is released cant escape this idea that a certain amount of players makes it a battlefield game.

[RYKUU]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

It is a similar ideas with the MMO's all of them are compared to world of warcraft, when they are all different in their own way. Yes battlefield DOES generally have larger maps though we can't say COD can't.
Edit: that annoys me so much it is now my sig.

[jesus]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

I enjoy playing CoD4 on big servers, and none of you can honestly tell me that A LOT of people don't enjoy them.

Like I've said before: higher player limit = more options = more people are happy

How hard is that to understand?

[CaptainKirk]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

I enjoy playing CoD4 on big servers, and none of you can honestly tell me that A LOT of people don't enjoy them.

Like I've said before: higher player limit = more options = more people are happy

How hard is that to understand?

Game is not balanced for that. Play it as we made it, please. Enjoy your mouse support.

[Stev0esque]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

Game is not balanced for that. Play it as we made it, please. Enjoy your mouse support.

oops, sorry, another late announcement. You have to buy a plug-in xbox 360 controller to play. Oh another one, you have to buy a 360 to play it.

[groundedzero]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

Game is not balanced for that. Play it as we made it, please. Enjoy your mouse support.

BWAHAHAHA words of God himself!

So good I'm makin that my siggy

But yeh, it's ridiculous how game makers have gotten into this whole "holy crap we can't do that cos we have to be unique" bull....

[Minmaster]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

i agree with the guy who kept saying game is not balanced for this and that. remember how people were whining that there's too much nade spam in COD4 because of small maps and too many players? they're trying to fix it by limiting to 9v9.

remember what happens when 30+ people are allowed to play on a map like shipment?

[jesus]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

i agree with the guy who kept saying game is not balanced for this and that. remember how people were whining that there's too much nade spam in COD4 because of small maps and too many players? they're trying to fix it by limiting to 9v9.

remember what happens when 30+ people are allowed to play on a map like shipment?

don't join those servers.... duh

[Minmaster]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

don't join those servers.... duh

well, they're fun once in a while just for some nonstop nonsensical gratuitous killing.

like when you want a quick and easy way to get 80+ headshots in one round with your sniper rifle. :laugh:

[imported_JuDGe]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

Anybody that buys this game is just supporting the DEATH of PC-GAMING, COMMUNITIES and TOURNAMENTS, and should be ashamed!! DO NOT support an inferior game just so you can have something new to play.

BOYCOTT MW2!!!!!
BOYCOTT MW2!!!!!
BOYCOTT MW2!!!!!

[ebevan_91]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

So for it to be considered "Call of duty" , it can't have a high player count?
so a 32 Cod map is battlefield? i would much rather play a larger Cod map then go to battlefield.

No I was saying if you prefer a smaller player count on smaller maps then CoD would be the game for you.

If you prefer large maps with large player counts then BF would be the game for you.

[stilla-killa]

Re: 9 v 9 Multiplayer? ARE YOU KIDDING ME

Anybody that buys this game is just supporting the DEATH of PC-GAMING, COMMUNITIES and TOURNAMENTS, and should be ashamed!! DO NOT support an inferior game just so you can have something new to play.

BOYCOTT MW2!!!!!
BOYCOTT MW2!!!!!
BOYCOTT MW2!!!!!

I will be getting it the day it comes out. Thanks for trying though.