battlefield (3)

[iQue]

Re: battlefield (3)

I've only played 1942 after all the other BF games and I must admit it's a great game, but it has far from the same feeling as the later titles - I guess you had to be there in the beginning. :) A new WW2 BF, sort of an opposite to BFH in the same setting - would be absolutely awesome. Insta-buy!

DC is pretty sweet but still lacks some of the fluidity the later games have. Totally understandable :awes

[Firestorm]

Re: battlefield (3)

Ocular implants, of course. Kind of like that technology where jet pilots only have to look at a target and their gun aims in that direction by sensing the motion of the eye? Same kind of deal.

And to Wizardwarts and BIFF, QFT! There are a lot of people that I'm sure feel they wouldn't play another WW2 BF game (which I'm sure is just talk...you know who you are and you know you'd buy the next BF game even if it was WW2 ), but I do long for the days of BF when there weren't commander spots and infantry scanners and UAVs all over the place. Remember in BF:V when you could sneak undetected through a thick part of the jungle with a couple teammates, plop down the spawn tunnel, and by the time the enemy knew anything about it your whole team was spawning at their airfield? With all the detection devices in BF2142, and even the all-seeing-eye commander and UAV in BF2, this is almost impossible to do. It's an aspect of the gameplay I really miss. That isn't to say that a possible WW2 BF wouldn't have something like a commander, but if they did it would certainly be harder to justify him being able to bring up a map of the area and spot individual infantry all over the place.

Plus, remember when AA/Flak was actually useful? And there were ships and shore defenses? And submarines? And the StG44? And when you couldn't bring people back to life or instantly heal yourself to full health? It's also nice to see (BIFF) that there are still some people besides myself who wish for more vehicle action instead of just 24/7 citymaps/infantry combat. :salute:

battlefield 1942 was defintely a cool game. Omaha Beach was infintely more hectic than any of the other maps in the Battlefield games.

[RW-RogueWolf]

Re: battlefield (3)

Most of the mature posters are tired of seeing endless threads about BF3. We've already talked it into the ground several times and there isn't really any solid information about what the future of the Battlefield series is. When new information crops up, someone will post it in the NEWS section.

Until then, most of us are really worn out from beating this dead horse.

Ahaha, you...a mature poster...ahaha you are a funny one i'll give you that :laugh:

this is exactly why this forum is dead......someone new comes in asking a innocent enough question and the ducebags cant berate them fast enough.....yea i clicked it.......and i was two and a half pages and about two hours into adding news to my website in another firefox tab.....GRRRRRRRRRRR

PUT UP A STICKY

Hey Hey! Glad someone else agree's! Hense why i call TGN A Cut Throat Group!

As for BF3, its gunna be good for....maybe half a year to a year, then the noobs will hit and hit hard and it will fall in flames like everything else...

[=98=]

Re: battlefield (3)

As for BF3, its gunna be good for....maybe half a year to a year, then the noobs will hit and hit hard and it will fall in flames like everything else...

much like your humour...

[RW-RogueWolf]

Re: battlefield (3)

much like your humour...

Such A Lovely Admin....Truely You Are...

[Kreepy Kitteh =^o.O^=]

Re: battlefield (3)

Such A Lovely Admin....Truely You Are...

You just spend too much time and effort trolling the BF2 forums..

[BIFF EXPLODER]

Re: battlefield (3)

Such A Lovely Admin....Truely You Are...

well, might not be lovely but he is right, i dont see why it would fall in flames like "everything else", BF2 didnt, 2142 either, even 1942 and vietnam still have quite some players.

just because you stop playing the game it doesnt mean the game is dead.

BF3 will probably be another success like the previous games.

[=98=]

Re: battlefield (3)

well, might not be lovely but he is right, i dont see why it would fall in flames like "everything else", BF2 didnt, 2142 either, even 1942 and vietnam still have quite some players.

just because you stop playing the game it doesnt mean the game is dead.

BF3 will probably be another success like the previous games.

Yea, we can't really guess anything, but given the popularity of the older games, i think any next release would do fine :)

[Stev0esque]

Re: battlefield (3)

Yea, we can't really guess anything, but given the popularity of the older games, i think any next release would do fine :)

yeah, as long as it has its fans, things we love from battlefield and things that attract people to it BF(3/???) should survive.

[|D|-Jaws]

Re: battlefield (3)

They would not say anything about because as far as they know, it doesn't exist. They had been asked before in other interviews and declined to answer and thus, we felt best not to directly challenge them.

BF3 is under development, it's only a matter of time before we get told :)

So if it's not your job to challenge them....whose job is it?

[=98=]

Re: battlefield (3)

So if it's not your job to challenge them....whose job is it?

It's already been asked.

[Rambo]

Re: battlefield (3)

So if it's not your job to challenge them....whose job is it?

they asked but if they get pushy about it they might not update tgn anymore

Its best to keep them allies for the best intell:thumbsup::salute:

Im sure TGN will be the first to hear any leaks:nod:

and Gameartist you make me laugh:p ,why even wake up in the morning if u expect everything to fail?

As much as we complain about bf2 and yes it might not have ALL the content or exactly what we expect from a ideal game. Still you have to admit bf2 is a awesome game(flaws and all),even to todays standards.

I mean, i recently got cod WAW and its crap compared to bf2

[RW-RogueWolf]

Re: battlefield (3)

and Gameartist you make me laugh:p ,why even wake up in the morning if u expect everything to fail?

I mean, i recently got cod WAW and its crap compared to bf2

You know i ask myself the same question...everything just...fails around me, its quite scary :cry:

BF2 is an awesome, brilliant out of this world game, the people that play it, have destroyed everything it stood for, baseraping, glitching, hacks, team killers, n()()bs & total and utter d!(k head admins.

If the game consisted of decent down to earth, proper gamers then i'd still be on BF2 today, but it plainly doesn't, because of the BF2 god complex rule... at least with cod2 (which personally is more fun than BF2 at this time) you get a decent game out of it, with no baseraping, glitching, hacks, team killers, n()()bs & total and utter d!(k head admins, at least not on the Marvin Extreme Servers, now they rule!

Umm...i'd have to say Cod WaW & BF2 are equally as bad, for different reasons but it all adds up to the same.

EDIT: Left 4 Dead Blows Um All Away, It Never Gets Boring!

[=98=]

Re: battlefield (3)

I was L4D today... and it looked rubbish. I'll stick with WaW, a real game

*Dons flame proof vest*

You can't get me now!!!

[RW-RogueWolf]

Re: battlefield (3)

I was L4D today... and it looked rubbish. I'll stick with WaW, a real game

*Dons flame proof vest*

You can't get me now!!!

WaW is far from a real game, its a wanna be call of duty 4 & Cod 4 was poor, WaW is poor, its a game built for n()()bs...

Done :)