Re: games need more blood
Funny how those are movies.
games need more blood
Collapse
X
-
Re: games need more blood
ROFL!! I listen to ALL music, from such bands as the beach boys and the Beatles right up to Marilyn Manson, the dirty pretty things and even James Blunt. Like I always say all music is good music.
Now what IS funny is you're 35 and still haven't grasped the concept of individuality and chose to display this narrow mindedness on a gaming forum.. Well done :congrats:Leave a comment:
-
Re: games need more blood
The puff of smoke is a little more realistic than you think... ever watch Band of Brothers? Or saving Private Ryan?Leave a comment:
-
Re: games need more blood
Everyone listens to what they like...Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: games need more blood
gore=awesome
Adds to the atmosphere.Leave a comment:
-
Re: games need more blood
@CrAzY eYeD cAt =^O.o^=
Your AVATAR, and I really mean the avatar and not your sig,
so your avatar is gore enough, make me puke everytime I see it.
Thank god I can avoid their music ;-)
btw. I can't believe you're 23 listening to a band of 16 year old fags, lolLeave a comment:
-
Re: games need more blood
that made me lol..Originally posted by TooFarAwayit would just be more gratifying/ rewarding if someone's head popped when you shot it.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: games need more blood
i'd like to think this isnt a debate on what kind of person wants to see it. its a debate as to why it isnt there. to me it just makes more sense for someone to bleed when you shoot them
. plus it would just be more gratifying/ rewarding if someone's head popped when you shot it.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: games need more blood
yeah i agree 100%. Gore isnt bad, but its not going to make a game unplayable if it is/nt thereOriginally posted by NeptuneI wouldn't mind gore, and i wouldn't mind no gore, it really doesnt matter to me. But what the hell is up with the puff of smoke in bf2? Id rather have gore than that. Whose idea was it? I can't imagine someone saying "hey instead of blood, lets have the soldiers SMOKE." I think we can all agree blood>smoke, but it wouldn't hurt bf2 if the smoke effect was removed.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: games need more blood
No games don't need more blood.What EA's games need is less bugs and a much better way to register them through the net to play multiplayer and not have like...problems all the time.Leave a comment:
-
Re: games need more blood
Originally posted by NeptuneI think we can all agree blood>smoke, but it wouldn't hurt bf2 if the smoke effect was removed.
I like the smoke, it's one hell of a lot better than blood. It's kinda cool to headshot someone with a sniper rifle, they fall to the ground but you still see the little cloud of smoke for a while... lol. not realistic but I don't care. A game doesn't have to be realistic to be fun.
But I wouldn't mind an option to bring in blood for those who want it. I personally don't.Leave a comment:
-
Re: games need more blood
I wouldn't mind gore, and i wouldn't mind no gore, it really doesnt matter to me. But what the hell is up with the puff of smoke in bf2? Id rather have gore than that. Whose idea was it? I can't imagine someone saying "hey instead of blood, lets have the soldiers SMOKE." I think we can all agree blood>smoke, but it wouldn't hurt bf2 if the smoke effect was removed.Leave a comment:
-
-
Re: games need more blood
"The only people that want to see gore are those that haven't seen it before."Leave a comment:
-
Re: games need more blood
The average gamer is actually 33, believe it or not :)Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: