games need more blood

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • solofowaffles
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    Originally posted by Kyle
    The puff of smoke is a little more realistic than you think... ever watch Band of Brothers? Or saving Private Ryan?
    Funny how those are movies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kreepy Kitteh =^o.O^=
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    Originally posted by ElFipso
    @CrAzY eYeD cAt =^O.o^=

    Your AVATAR, and I really mean the avatar and not your sig,
    so your avatar is gore enough, make me puke everytime I see it.
    Thank god I can avoid their music ;-)

    btw. I can't believe you're 23 listening to a band of 16 year old fags, lol
    ROFL!! I listen to ALL music, from such bands as the beach boys and the Beatles right up to Marilyn Manson, the dirty pretty things and even James Blunt. Like I always say all music is good music.

    Now what IS funny is you're 35 and still haven't grasped the concept of individuality and chose to display this narrow mindedness on a gaming forum.. Well done :congrats:

    Leave a comment:


  • Kylee!
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    The puff of smoke is a little more realistic than you think... ever watch Band of Brothers? Or saving Private Ryan?

    Leave a comment:


  • =)BiT(= Evant3k
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    Originally posted by ElFipso
    @CrAzY eYeD cAt =^O.o^=

    Your AVATAR, and I really mean the avatar and not your sig,
    so your avatar is gore enough, make me puke everytime I see it.
    Thank god I can avoid their music ;-)

    btw. I can't believe you're 23 listening to a band of 16 year old fags, lol
    Everyone listens to what they like...

    Leave a comment:


  • L3adcannon
    Guest replied
    Re: games need more blood

    gore=awesome

    Adds to the atmosphere.

    Leave a comment:


  • ElFipso
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    @CrAzY eYeD cAt =^O.o^=

    Your AVATAR, and I really mean the avatar and not your sig,
    so your avatar is gore enough, make me puke everytime I see it.
    Thank god I can avoid their music ;-)

    btw. I can't believe you're 23 listening to a band of 16 year old fags, lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Kreepy Kitteh =^o.O^=
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    Originally posted by TooFarAway
    it would just be more gratifying/ rewarding if someone's head popped when you shot it.
    that made me lol..

    Leave a comment:


  • TooFarAway
    Guest replied
    Re: games need more blood

    i'd like to think this isnt a debate on what kind of person wants to see it. its a debate as to why it isnt there. to me it just makes more sense for someone to bleed when you shoot them . plus it would just be more gratifying/ rewarding if someone's head popped when you shot it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stev0esque
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    Originally posted by Neptune
    I wouldn't mind gore, and i wouldn't mind no gore, it really doesnt matter to me. But what the hell is up with the puff of smoke in bf2? Id rather have gore than that. Whose idea was it? I can't imagine someone saying "hey instead of blood, lets have the soldiers SMOKE." I think we can all agree blood>smoke, but it wouldn't hurt bf2 if the smoke effect was removed.
    yeah i agree 100%. Gore isnt bad, but its not going to make a game unplayable if it is/nt there

    Leave a comment:


  • Foinikas
    Guest replied
    Re: games need more blood

    No games don't need more blood.What EA's games need is less bugs and a much better way to register them through the net to play multiplayer and not have like...problems all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • iQue
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    Originally posted by Neptune
    I think we can all agree blood>smoke, but it wouldn't hurt bf2 if the smoke effect was removed.


    I like the smoke, it's one hell of a lot better than blood. It's kinda cool to headshot someone with a sniper rifle, they fall to the ground but you still see the little cloud of smoke for a while... lol. not realistic but I don't care. A game doesn't have to be realistic to be fun.

    But I wouldn't mind an option to bring in blood for those who want it. I personally don't.

    Leave a comment:


  • imported_Neptune
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    I wouldn't mind gore, and i wouldn't mind no gore, it really doesnt matter to me. But what the hell is up with the puff of smoke in bf2? Id rather have gore than that. Whose idea was it? I can't imagine someone saying "hey instead of blood, lets have the soldiers SMOKE." I think we can all agree blood>smoke, but it wouldn't hurt bf2 if the smoke effect was removed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kreepy Kitteh =^o.O^=
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    Originally posted by youm0nt
    "The only people that want to see gore are those that haven't seen it before."
    well that would be most people, Not everyone has been to war or seen "gore" in real life.

    Leave a comment:


  • imported_youm0nt
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    "The only people that want to see gore are those that haven't seen it before."

    Leave a comment:


  • iQue
    replied
    Re: games need more blood

    The average gamer is actually 33, believe it or not :)

    Leave a comment:

Working...