PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • [Expletive Deleted]
    The Penetrator
    • Oct 2006
    • 2855

    #61
    Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

    As a soldier with over 8 years of active duty, including some time in the 82nd Airborne Division, I'll say that a lot of soldiers hold their weapons like that guy in the picture. Well, most avoid having it out of the shoulder pocket, but a lot use the magwell as something to hold. Since we've gone to the IBA with plates, it's really hard for anyone under 6' tall to reach the foregrip and keep a good sight picture. At 6'1" I can do it, but it's pretty uncomfortable so I tend to get lazy from time to time and hold it by the magwell myself.
    Though in the picture it looks like the guy is just looking through the sight at something, not preparing to engage a target.

    Comment

    • jdrou
      Member
      • Jul 2006
      • 1860

      #62
      Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

      "The latest issue of PC Gamer has a preview on the previously rumored fourth Battlefield installment (counting Battlefield 2142). "

      Wouldn't it be the fifth installment: BF1942, BFV, BF2, BF2142, BF3?

      Comment

      • waaah_wah
        TEAM BLADE!
        • Jun 2007
        • 3656

        #63
        Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

        I dont think they count Bf:V

        Comment

        • FPS[SONIC]
          Member
          • Oct 2006
          • 2106

          #64
          Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

          Originally posted by Rhino
          wtf is that guy doing using the mag as a foregrip?

          edit: and also aint even got the stock in his arm pit, and god hes just doing everything wrong... if you use a r/l image use a proper images...
          He is not using the rifle as a weapon, but as an observation device and he is holding it correctly for that task.

          The magazine well grip is pre-foregrip... don't forget those things are relatively new. His stance and how he is holding the rifle let's anyone looking at him know that he is not aiming at a target.

          This is a very common sight to see. :salute:

          Soldiers get very used to holding their M16/M4 by the mag well for comfort. But you wouldn't see them engage targets like that. Honestly, I also wouldn't be standing either if that were the case. We do a lot of standing and shooting from the hip in games, but that's not the way real soldiers do it at all.

          The very first thing you learn in indoctrination is how to "GET DOWN YOU MAGGOTS!'

          Seriously.

          Comment

          • Chris_Redfield
            Member
            • Oct 2006
            • 5986

            #65
            Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

            :laugh:

            As usual, my backup arrives too late.

            Comment

            • [Expletive Deleted]
              The Penetrator
              • Oct 2006
              • 2855

              #66
              Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

              Originally posted by Chris_Redfield
              :laugh:

              As usual, my backup arrives too late.
              Hey, I said about the same thing at the beginning of this page...

              Comment

              • FPS[SONIC]
                Member
                • Oct 2006
                • 2106

                #67
                Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

                Yes, I do believe that you did say something quite similar. Sorry, I read the original post and replied without reading all the rest.

                -1 cookie for me :shock:

                Comment

                • nadicus

                  #68
                  Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

                  So this just proves that Rhino and WHAAA_WHAA!! have no idea what they're talking about and lack insight into proper procedures in AR observation stances????

                  But of course those in the armed forces, like Rhino and WHAA_WA_WHAA, must know what they are talking about.

                  Comment

                  • L3adcannon

                    #69
                    Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

                    Oh snap, this is gonna be good.

                    Comment

                    • Chris_Redfield
                      Member
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 5986

                      #70
                      Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

                      Originally posted by Jimtool655321
                      Hey, I said about the same thing at the beginning of this page...
                      Maybe it was a different topic? I just skimmed through the five pages 3 times and didnt see it.

                      On the topic of short guys and foregrips- cant you just bring the grip closer to the magwell?

                      Comment

                      • 12:oc7ock
                        Member
                        • May 2006
                        • 1020

                        #71
                        Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

                        Originally posted by Rhino
                        wtf is that guy doing using the mag as a foregrip?

                        ...
                        Easy dude, he's scanning his sector not firing.

                        Comment

                        • TheEn|gma
                          Member
                          • Jun 2005
                          • 5247

                          #72
                          Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

                          Getting back to more important things other than a picture of a soldier.

                          If BF3 is being worked on, so is Mirror's Edge and BF:BC. Meaning that Dice has somehow managed to get a lot more employees probably from EA (oh noes).

                          Or EA's in-house dev team is taking on BF3 or one of the other projects.

                          Comment

                          • iQue
                            Member
                            • May 2007
                            • 4925

                            #73
                            Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

                            Originally posted by waaah_wah
                            I dont think they count Bf:V
                            Why wouldn't they do that? It wasn't a horrible game exactly...

                            Comment

                            • vanilla
                              Member
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 983

                              #74
                              Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

                              Look at all those experts in this topic. If BF3 gathers the same kind of people, I'd rather have it future warfare again.

                              Comment

                              • waaah_wah
                                TEAM BLADE!
                                • Jun 2007
                                • 3656

                                #75
                                Re: PC gamer confirms battlefield 3?

                                Originally posted by -UtC- Iquere «
                                Why wouldn't they do that? It wasn't a horrible game exactly...
                                Wasnt Bf:V just an expansion of Bf1942 or something?

                                Comment

                                Working...