This ain't battlefield

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Unzen
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by BIFF EXPLODER
    actually BF2 for me was the worst of the series, 1942 continues to be the best in many many ways, BFV had many things to be very good but the engine killed the game, and 2142 for me is alot more fun then BF2.

    the content of 1942 alone throws BF2 away into oblivion.
    You have a point. The El Alamein map has still to be bettered in any FPS, imo.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheEn|gma
    replied
    Hopefully this is a back to basics exercise by Dice, and hopefully from this we will be able get back to the fundamentals of game design, good concept, well executed and released when it's ready not when the screaming children demand it.

    Please :)

    Leave a comment:


  • Kradath
    replied
    Oh my god, something new...we just want to get the same thing with new graphics for every upcoming part of the series...you don't like it, wait for the real Battlefield 3 and leave this one left by.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Shifty-
    replied
    Originally posted by CaptKot
    I dunno, but bf2 was a great game. The best in the series.
    What people, like me, loved in the series was the feeling that you participate in a real war. You had that in BFV and 1942.

    Then they brought us 2142, and it was kinda lame, fighting like some starwars stormtroopers.

    Then I thought they would bring out a real BF3 but no, they bring out THAT:
    bad graphics, unrealistic, some pseudo humor, 3rd person etc.

    I mean, people, come on! Can't you see that this is not Battlefield as we know and love it?

    I am very dissappointed, though I still hope that they will announce a real sequel soon.

    You can't speak for everyone, and don't even try to!

    I for one, play BF2142 a lot, it's a great addicting game, it's not stormtrooperish, you fight with guns that shoot like they do nowdays. And the only new thing is floating carriers and walking tanks.

    As for Battlefield Heroes. I think it's a good game, you'll feel like you're on the battlefield shooting Bugs Bunny, or Elmer Phud :p. No but I think it'll turn out good. And addictive. Just like evey BF game in the series.

    And just so you know there's probably at least 100,000 people who play BF2142, or more. So don't think that you speak for them too right?

    Leave a comment:


  • RYKUU
    replied
    Originally posted by CaptKot
    I dunno, but bf2 was a great game. The best in the series.
    What people, like me, loved in the series was the feeling that you participate in a real war. You had that in BFV and 1942.

    Then they brought us 2142, and it was kinda lame, fighting like some starwars stormtroopers.

    Then I thought they would bring out a real BF3 but no, they bring out THAT:
    bad graphics, unrealistic, some pseudo humor, 3rd person etc.

    I mean, people, come on! Can't you see that this is not Battlefield as we know and love it?

    I am very dissappointed, though I still hope that they will announce a real sequel soon.

    they wanted a cartoon feel to the game its aimed at FUN! not all realistic, they made the cartoon graphics on purpose

    Leave a comment:


  • BIFF EXPLODER
    replied
    simplest formula ever...

    like = play
    dont like = dont play

    Leave a comment:


  • I am RKO
    Guest replied
    Thats the biggest thing. When you don't pay for a game, you can't really expect anything can you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sniper1432
    replied
    Like Alex said, this is not BF3. This is a game just to have fun on. Plus it's FREE.

    Leave a comment:


  • BIFF EXPLODER
    replied
    actually BF2 for me was the worst of the series, 1942 continues to be the best in many many ways, BFV had many things to be very good but the engine killed the game, and 2142 for me is alot more fun then BF2.

    the content of 1942 alone throws BF2 away into oblivion.

    Leave a comment:


  • jake_
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • iQue
    replied
    Originally posted by CaptKot
    Then they brought us 2142, and it was kinda lame, fighting like some starwars stormtroopers.
    Shut up.

    This won't be any type of sequel for the battlefield games... BFBC/BF3 is the future, not BFH! It's just a little game that focuses on fun for the more casual gamer...

    Chill out

    Leave a comment:


  • =98=
    replied
    Originally posted by CaptKot
    I dunno, but bf2 was a great game. The best in the series.
    What people, like me, loved in the series was the feeling that you participate in a real war. You had that in BFV and 1942.

    Then they brought us 2142, and it was kinda lame, fighting like some starwars stormtroopers.

    Then I thought they would bring out a real BF3 but no, they bring out THAT:
    bad graphics, unrealistic, some pseudo humor, 3rd person etc.

    I mean, people, come on! Can't you see that this is not Battlefield as we know and love it?

    I am very dissappointed, though I still hope that they will announce a real sequel soon.
    DICE stated clearly that this is NOT, "Battlefield 3". We should expect that in the future. Don't rush them to release any time soon, as they might get it right this time :yay:

    Leave a comment:


  • CaptKot
    Guest started a topic This ain't battlefield

    This ain't battlefield

    I dunno, but bf2 was a great game. The best in the series.
    What people, like me, loved in the series was the feeling that you participate in a real war. You had that in BFV and 1942.

    Then they brought us 2142, and it was kinda lame, fighting like some starwars stormtroopers.

    Then I thought they would bring out a real BF3 but no, they bring out THAT:
    bad graphics, unrealistic, some pseudo humor, 3rd person etc.

    I mean, people, come on! Can't you see that this is not Battlefield as we know and love it?

    I am very dissappointed, though I still hope that they will announce a real sequel soon.
Working...