Originally posted by Field
It takes money to host a server, even if you're doing it out of your own home: you pay for the internet connection, electricity, and even cooling the heat which the server puts out. By contrast, if you have the server colocated in a datacenter, you pay the datacenter hosting fees, router fees, or whatever else they decide to tack on top of that, not to mention having to pay for the server box itself. For what you are saying to be even feasable, the game developer would need to be able to host servers to house all the players.
To put it simply, this would never, ever happen without jacking the price of games up significantly or forcing players to pay a subscription to play online. Would I ever pay a subscription fee for an online FPS? When hell freezes over, I may consider it.
When I'm the one paying the bills, why should I join the server which I pay my hard earned money for and play in a style which I despise? That makes no sense, and if everything worked this way, no servers for the games outside of the servers the GSPs are required to host would exist. While you may think the people who control the resources to keep those servers operating should not control the way the game is played, there's not a viable alternative.
Absolute socialism failed in the real world; it certainly won't work in a capitalistic game.
" into a "YOUR RULES SUCK BECAUSE I CAN'T KILL A WALKER WITHOUT BREAKING RULES". Maybe you need to re-evaluate your supposed "skill" if you can't deal with that. Also, you might have noticed that you were on a clan server, not a match-server, so who gives a monkeys if in competitive gaming and on ladders that rdx-jeeps are allowed?
That IS weaksauce.
), but if a server bans it, I will gladly comply and take out armor the "usual" way.
Comment