At what point did people stop playing and start whining?

[Chris_Redfield]

Im Officer Redfield, the Thread Police. Time for you, gentlemen, to bugger off or youll spend the night in the hole with Jacko.

[ElFipso]

Oh noes, Chris will redline us out of the thread :laugh:

[waaah_wah]

Being a 'teamwork player' has nothing to do with it.

The last time I checked, you guys had your own forums.

You said so yourself it's probably the most crowded mod, meaning it's probably the largest and most known. You don't have to tell us about it in every thread.

The mod doesn't make me mad...kids who act like they're socially better than everyone else because they play it make me mad.

Now if you excuse me, Chris_Redfield and I have some baby making to do.

Like JustMe said, you probably hear more about CoD4, Crysis, CS and all that crap than PR.

[Sloi sauce]

That's because they're better than PR.

All jokes aside...

[Chris_Redfield]

Oh noes, Chris will redline us out of the thread :laugh:

Man, this is so good! :laugh:

Like JustMe said, you probably hear more about CoD4, Crysis, CS and all that crap than PR.

Crysis, COD4 and CS being crap? :laugh:

Forgive me. Ive never had so much gameplay freedom and creativity utilization as I did with Crysis, and I havent had that much fun in an online shooter as with COD4 since 2 years ago.

Those games arent "crap", and I wish there was someone with high level competitive background to give you a rundown on how deep, even games as simplistic as CS, they really are.

[signa]

Oh noes, Chris will redline us out of the thread :laugh:

LOL :laugh:

[waaah_wah]

Man, this is so good! :laugh:



Crysis, COD4 and CS being crap? :laugh:

Forgive me. Ive never had so much gameplay freedom and creativity utilization as I did with Crysis, and I havent had that much fun in an online shooter as with COD4 since 2 years ago.

Those games arent "crap", and I wish there was someone with high level competitive background to give you a rundown on how deep, even games as simplistic as CS, they really are.

To me, those games are crap. I dont really like arcadish run n' gun games, yes you can do all sorts of stuff in Crysis but i hate the fact that you have to shoot ppl 20 times to kill them... CoD is pretty much CS with better graphics. And CS just sucks IMO, small maps, crap graphics, short rounds, and ofcourse the fact that you can penetrate a concrete wall with an M4 and still be able to kill the guy on the other side. Or that you can litteraly stand on top of a grenade and survive... The list goes on

[zipp0r]

every multiplayer game ive played ive bin moaned at and my mum called some not nice things lol
thing is bf2 players try every gay way they can find to get a kill and its usually when they outnumber you or have a tank/whatever. ofc that irritates me so i do what i do best and they dont like it when a 1 man army annihilates their team with a solo chopper or a jet... then they start the vote kick.

[Chris_Redfield]

To me, those games are crap. I dont really like arcadish run n' gun games, yes you can do all sorts of stuff in Crysis but i hate the fact that you have to shoot ppl 20 times to kill them...

You dont need 20 shots to kill someone. Not in SP and neither in MP. But in the end, were talking about a game where youre equipped with a "special suit", needless to say, tactical side of the game turns a new page.

CoD is pretty much CS with better graphics.

COD4 is completely different than CSS. You can start from the engagement tactics, all the way up to map build.

And CS just sucks IMO, small maps, crap graphics, short rounds, and ofcourse the fact that you can penetrate a concrete wall with an M4 and still be able to kill the guy on the other side. Or that you can litteraly stand on top of a grenade and survive... The list goes on

Ever seen what 5.56 or 7.62 round does to a wall made of "clay"? But I see your point, you like realistic games over arkade games. Its cool, but saying the games are crap, when technically (as you do state your opinions as facts) they are superior to most games out there, is simply foolish.

[zipp0r]

To me, those games are crap. I dont really like arcadish run n' gun games, yes you can do all sorts of stuff in Crysis but i hate the fact that you have to shoot ppl 20 times to kill them... CoD is pretty much CS with better graphics. And CS just sucks IMO, small maps, crap graphics, short rounds, and ofcourse the fact that you can penetrate a concrete wall with an M4 and still be able to kill the guy on the other side. Or that you can litteraly stand on top of a grenade and survive... The list goes on

bf2 has far worse infantry gameplay than most other games. your smoking crack :shakehead

cs isnt as bad as you make out and it tends to be about good gameplay, go against me in bf2 and chances are i would die several times by a random lucky headshot, go against me in cs and id take your head off before you even shot at me... big difference in gun combat..

[waaah_wah]

bf2 has far worse infantry gameplay than most other games. your smoking crack :shakehead

I rarely play Bf2 nowadays... But you are right, inf combat in Bf2 is really messed up

cs isnt as bad as you make out and it tends to be about good gameplay,

Not fun for me

go against me in bf2 and chances are i would die several times by a random lucky headshot,

And that doesnt happend in CS...?

go against me in cs and id take your head off before you even shot at me... big difference in gun combat..

I pretty much suck in CS...

.........

[Sloi sauce]

You're on crack if you think Crysis, COD4 and CS suck: they all offer drastically better ground combat.

[waaah_wah]

You dont need 20 shots to kill someone. Not in SP and neither in MP. But in the end, were talking about a game where youre equipped with a "special suit", needless to say, tactical side of the game turns a new page.

Those guys in SP doesnt have a suit and you still need alot of bullets to bring them down...

COD4 is completely different than CSS. You can start from the engagement tactics, all the way up to map build.

Still a small map run n' gun game tho:)

Ever seen what 5.56 or 7.62 round does to a wall made of "clay"? But I see your point, you like realistic games over arkade games. Its cool, but saying the games are crap, when technically (as you do state your opinions as facts) they are superior to most games out there, is simply foolish.

Well, you can penetrate a clay wall with 5.56mm but it wont kill a guy with a kevlar on the other side of that wall. And in CS, you can often penetrate CONCRETE walls with 5.56mm... Thats messed up

...........

You're on crack if you think Crysis, COD4 and CS suck: they all offer drastically better ground combat.

IMO, they all suck

[Chris_Redfield]

Those guys in SP doesnt have a suit and you still need alot of bullets to bring them down...

What the hell are you talking about :laugh:

3 body shots, or 1 headshot, and they go down. At a specific stage youre fighting NK people who have the same suit as you do, THOSE are harder.

Still a small map run n' gun game tho

You havent really played the game, have you?

COD4 "Objective" gamemode. It can be as slow as death itsself. On the counter side, a real life engagement is all about speed, precision, shock and surprise.

Well, you can penetrate a clay wall with 5.56mm but it wont kill a guy with a kevlar on the other side of that wall. And in CS, you can often penetrate CONCRETE walls with 5.56mm... Thats messed up

5.56NATO round can penetrate a concrete wall, if its 5 centimetres thick. A clay wall is much, much easier to penetrate. A kevlar vest does not stop a 5.56 millimetre round.

Finally, CS isnt a realistic shooter, its wallshooting is made for a reason. On the flipside, youd be surprised how little realism in PR actually is.

[Sloi sauce]

Care to substantiate that one-liner opinion with an explanation as to why PR > COD4, Crysis and CS?