undectables?

**[GCA]Tim270** · 08-19-2007, 01:59 PM

Re: undectables?

Originally posted by alex98uk

Can you imagine how crap it would be searching for a sniper at the end of a round for 15 minutes without UAV?

Hunt, if you have ever played it is one of the best games in bf2.

**=98=** · 08-19-2007, 07:01 PM

Re: undectables?

In 64 player Kubra Dam??? No thanks, doesn't sound like fun to me.

**DOGGiE52** · 08-19-2007, 07:03 PM

Re: undectables?

I made a thread about maybe hiding snipers from satscan at some times. I got flamed for posting my thoughts.

**=98=** · 08-19-2007, 07:04 PM

Re: undectables?

Originally posted by Doggie52

I got flamed for posting my thoughts.

Seems to be a common theme around your posts :laugh:

**DOGGiE52** · 08-19-2007, 07:05 PM

Re: undectables?

Originally posted by alex98uk

Seems to be a common theme around your posts :laugh:

Yes yes, maybe I'm just too revolutionary and smart for this community.

**Steppenwolf428** · 08-19-2007, 07:57 PM

Re: undectables?

Originally posted by Doggie52

Yes yes, maybe I'm just too revolutionary and smart for this community.

I sense a little bit of confidence, but i don't sense something else:shakehead:

**Rob848** · 08-19-2007, 09:06 PM

Re: undectables?

USE THE SEARCH FUNCTION! IT'S NOT THAT HARD!

That's not revolutionary, that's just annoying.

**magdelen11235** · 08-19-2007, 10:18 PM

Re: undectables?

Originally posted by Goldleader101

that would be rather boring, and a lot of people might whore the kit if it can't be detected. But in theory it sounds good

yeah it does sound good, but i agree the game would be filled with snipers with aimbots

Comment