who should be 1st?

[KrayboX]

well i think -=RD=-Volx sux look at his awards and he still a colonel, but for example erc.uk he is a really good player.. i think he should be first( only players from the top 50 )

[tom91]

Re: who should be 1st?

I think I should be first :)

[KrayboX]

Re: who should be 1st?

I think I should be first :)

of the top 50 ¬_¬

[imported_Nefarious]

Re: who should be 1st?

You mean ECR.RC?

IMO, I dont care whos number one. Volx has over 500,000 points. His awards, nor his rank, represent his skill. That applies for everyone.

Do you want ECR.RC to be number one because of his skill (pressuming you've played in the same server) or because he has all the awards?

[Revoluti0n]

Re: who should be 1st?

You mean ECR.RC?

IMO, I dont care whos number one. Volx has over 500,000 points.

His awards, nor his rank, represent his skill. That applies for everyone.

Do you want ECR.RC to be number one because of his skill (pressuming you've played in the same server) or because he has all the awards?

Absolutely!

[Sub_zer0]

Re: who should be 1st?

I think no one it should be about fun and gameplay not stats

[Lazza66]

Re: who should be 1st?

Do any of the top 20 deserve anything? They only play one map, Karkand, and only because of the high spm.

Can they do anything else other than prone spam infantry, medic and support whore on Karkand?

[Blades]

Re: who should be 1st?

That one guy Bushsomething or other. Too lazy to look it up. I think its BushViper?

Has a lot of map time on a lot of the Vanilla and SF maps.

[Sloi sauce]

Re: who should be 1st?

well i think -=RD=-Volx sux look at his awards and he still a colonel, but for example erc.uk he is a really good player.. i think he should be first( only players from the top 50 )

I think leaderboards should be more precisely organized. For example (in keeping with my helo obsession), the heli leaderboard should be organized as follows:

1- Attack helis
1a- Cobra
1aa- Pilot
1ab- Gunner
1b- Mec...
...
...
2- Transport helis
2a- Blackhawk
2aa- Pilot
2ab- Gunner
...
...

As it stands, the categories are too broad. Also, making someone the #1 of a leaderboard because he's played longer is stupid. They should further separate these categories by score range: 0 - 9999, 10000 to 19999, etc...

[Sub_zer0]

Re: who should be 1st?

I agree with having sections of leader boards.

[XmetallicaXguitarstX]

Re: who should be 1st?

Yeah they really do need gunner/pilot ranks..

[lmimmfn]

Re: who should be 1st?

To be honest with you i havnt seen any videos or anything of the top BF2 players/Clans who dont prone hop around like lunatics and use every single exploit in the game, which is fine, BUT i would not consider such a person a top player( full points for adaptation but not a top player ), anyone who can take these guys on and win playing non stupidly is a top player in my boat, i dont even care if the guy had a global score of 1000

[7man]

Re: who should be 1st?

ok i f you have ever played with BORS*ECR.RC then you would know that all there clan or whatever you what to call them does is sit in a rank or apc at a mec spawn points and spawncamp the whole entier game they get about 100 points around so down with ECR.RC up with Bushviper.

[GunHappyBob]

Re: who should be 1st?

Look at my stats, It would take me 65 years of constant playing even to get into the top 100,000. I suck.

[DesertFalcon]

Re: who should be 1st?

Ecr.RC should be #1