who should be 1st?

[imported_bigpappa]

Re: who should be 1st?

of the top 50 ¬_¬

of the top 500,000 i think i should be first.

[N2K]

Re: who should be 1st?

ECR.RC sucks ground and air, he would fly around in a server just to get his time. If you would try and shoot him down, all his clan mates would jump in AAs and call for the second jet and he would run and hide.

Two ex clan mates took him and patty something, who is a colonel, on a 2v2 choppers and totaly got owned. They were only a 2nd LT and a Sgt, and it was RCs clans server

[CensoredByGod]

Re: who should be 1st?

Nothing is quite as satisfying in BF as owning a General over and over. They are usually so arrogant they actually come looking for you after a few deaths, so they can prove a point. Then the more they get owned, the more they start spamming hack messages. Especially when your just a 1st Searg like me and he cant get you no matter what he does. Really its the best feeling.

In short, rank means exactly nothing more than time in game. Skill is something else altogether. As for badges, please, they are as easy to get as having a clan server with a few clan members helpin you earn em. Again no real measure of a players abilitys. Im proud to say I only have the badges that I earned the hard way and dont even care if I ever get another one.

[7man]

Re: who should be 1st?

ye patty is a 2 star now cause i played on that server recently and he get like over 100 points a game he hopins in a apc and spawncamps i mean whats the fun in that????

[imported_TheDragon]

Re: who should be 1st?

ecr.rc is actually a pretty BAD player
this is from personal observation
( I mean if I can whip him over and over in armor- he must not be that good :P )
and his clan = "bros" = stat pad like crazy and ADMIT it openly in game

my son plays with Viper daily - and says Viper ROCKS
baby spinach is also pretty good

[Drunken_x_Boxer]

Re: who should be 1st?

I played a round with ECR.RC and all he was doing was running back and forth on the carrier. I dont even think he was trying to do anything at all. He was a 3 star Genral at the time and I told him he has too much time on his hands to play a game that long. He said "no I barely ever get to play anymore".

Half the server started laughing at him and telling him to get a life. He left shortly after that. :laugh:

[aLi3nZ]

Re: who should be 1st?

ERC.RC is an AVG player with a lot of time on his hands. AVG Ratios all round and not a balanced player.

88% of Kills are in Amour

[12:oc7ock]

Re: who should be 1st?

That one guy Bushsomething or other. Too lazy to look it up. I think its BushViper?

Has a lot of map time on a lot of the Vanilla and SF maps.

Yea I played against him on the Black Knights server awhile back and killed him about as much as he did me at Karkand. He plays legit and doesn't exploit grenades, noob tubes etc.

[Iwantcable]

Re: who should be 1st?

BushViper is the best IMO. He dominates infantry combat, he actually goes and captures flags, too.

[NatureBoy_Wooo]

Re: who should be 1st?

well i think -=RD=-Volx sux look at his awards and he still a colonel, but for example erc.uk he is a really good player.. i think he should be first( only players from the top 50 )

For sure dude.

[predragjanjic]

Re: who should be 1st?

I judge players by honesty and how fair they are and trust me you cant find too many, if ur gonna judge by skill then look at the time the player has spent playing this game, ecr has over 3000 hours, how good will I be when I get there? there are better players with way less hours

[kenof2142]

Re: who should be 1st?

I think a better question is, who cares? :hmm:

[sassback]

Re: who should be 1st?

Ecr.RC should be #1

:rofl: i recommend you start playing on BROS 24/7 karkand. it used to be one one of my favorite haunts until i stopped playing karkand (for the most part). he is the worst tank whore ive ever seen, he has admitted to statpadding and never ever plays without his clanmates on his team. after you see him play you will change your mind.

[SERIALBUTCHER]

Re: who should be 1st?

ok i f you have ever played with BORS*ECR.RC then you would know that all there clan or whatever you what to call them does is sit in a rank or apc at a mec spawn points and spawncamp the whole entier game they get about 100 points around so down with ECR.RC up with Bushviper.

It is astonishing that when they camp mec spawn points the entire round that the entire mec team will REFUSE to switch to AT, & take him out w/ a massive volley of SRAW rockets, it only takes 2, or 3 AT guys to ROAST an armored vehicle

They keep doing that because it WORKS, I personal find it boring, & gay to sit in armour camping 24/7, but I can't knock guys for using armor to kill, when the other team has the means to stop them, but not the will, the other team has armor too, what are THEY doing?

However I do understand that sometimes you see both sides armor camping, & not fighting each other (that really burns me up if I am playing infantry), it is the reason I got heavy into armor myself, because the best way to kill armor is w/ armor

imvho

ps. My vote goes to Bushviper

Lieuteanant General |SI|SERIALBUTCHER

peace:)

[barracudaj]

Re: who should be 1st?

The number 1 spot should be determined by SPM, IMO.