Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RocketChild
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2005
    • 3949

    #46
    Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

    Originally posted by pYura
    As far as I know it was in the very first beta but they took out this feature...too bad



    Okay, goodbye!
    Yes, they did take that one out. They felt it was too evil. Get a game rating with that murderous feature?

    Comment

    • x_knight_x

      #47
      Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

      Originally posted by RocketChild
      Yes, they did take that one out. They felt it was too evil. Get a game rating with that murderous feature?
      Yep lol

      Comment

      • Skwurl

        #48
        Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

        Originally posted by HateKILLL™
        SI'am done w/ EA-DICE they can shove 2142 up thier arss.
        Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

        BF2142 = 1 less whiner.

        Today is a good day.

        Comment

        • whcchief

          #49
          Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

          Originally posted by HateKILLL™
          Still no mention of fixing the missing sound of the 50 cal.'s hitting the attack helis & no fix for tv missles going through heli's ,What a f***ing joke they cannot fix this !!!!!!!! I'am done w/ EA-DICE they can shove 2142 up thier arss.

          still no mention of fixing the missing sound of 50 cal. guns hitting
          Jesus how many times do you wanna say the same thing?
          **** off then. You haven't tried it yet.

          Comment

          • Komet.nl

            #50
            Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

            Why didn't the fixed the J-10. What a shame..
            Well I hope they will fix this one day for the rest it looks
            fine to me. Now let's hope this time they'll do it good
            and don't mess it up.

            Comment

            • imported_Kold81

              #51
              Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

              Hmmm thought they were gonna fix my drinking problem.......oh well

              Comment

              • Maverick2201

                #52
                Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

                even if they wanted to change that though, how would they? Just make infantry invincible to rockets?? You'd have more crybabies than you'd know what to do with...

                Comment

                • x_knight_x

                  #53
                  Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

                  Originally posted by Maverick2201
                  even if they wanted to change that though, how would they? Just make infantry invincible to rockets?? You'd have more crybabies than you'd know what to do with...
                  Hmm.. probably :cry:

                  Comment

                  • zipp0r

                    #54
                    Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

                    Originally posted by Gabe
                    they are trying to make it realistic. can you lay down in 0.1 second and get back up?
                    yes.. try it.. drop to the floor and jump up again... maybe if i was some fat burger eating "person that comes from a country i cant mention" that weighs 15+ stone i would struggle.

                    Comment

                    • Maverick2201

                      #55
                      Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

                      and in reality, its a tad more realistic that infantry dies from an AT rocket to the chest than a spec ops running around throwing C4 like a frisbee at targets and detonating them in mid air... maybe what they should do instead (since I realize that C4 could theoretically be thrown at a wall and not detonate) is increase C4's blast radius and power but only give spec ops 1 or 2 blocks instead of 5... whaddya think?

                      Comment

                      • x_knight_x

                        #56
                        Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

                        Originally posted by Maverick2201
                        and in reality, its a tad more realistic that infantry dies from an AT rocket to the chest than a spec ops running around throwing C4 like a frisbee at targets and detonating them in mid air... maybe what they should do instead (since I realize that C4 could theoretically be thrown at a wall and not detonate) is increase C4's blast radius and power but only give spec ops 1 or 2 blocks instead of 5... whaddya think?
                        Nah. c4 is good the way it is

                        Comment

                        • zipp0r

                          #57
                          Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

                          Originally posted by Maverick2201
                          and in reality, its a tad more realistic that infantry dies from an AT rocket to the chest than a spec ops running around throwing C4 like a frisbee at targets and detonating them in mid air... maybe what they should do instead (since I realize that C4 could theoretically be thrown at a wall and not detonate) is increase C4's blast radius and power but only give spec ops 1 or 2 blocks instead of 5... whaddya think?
                          nah its not, you would never be able to hit a guy with an antitank rocket for starters...
                          so how come AT rockets are 1hit kills and snipers arent?


                          Lets not post things like that again, smily or not

                          Comment

                          • x_knight_x

                            #58
                            Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

                            Originally posted by zipp0r
                            nah its not, you would never be able to hit a guy with an antitank rocket for starters...
                            so how come AT rockets are 1hit kills and snipers arent?
                            Well an anti-tank rocket can take a tank out in one shot.. can ur sniper bullet do that??

                            Comment

                            • longgone

                              #59
                              Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

                              -Good deal on the browser (it’s just a lame duck currently)
                              -One new map….pretty light but potentially a nice change (if it’s worth anything)
                              -C4 issue is sad, I’ll never get that exp explosive medal now…..and I loved chucking, it cracked me up how bad that pis*ed people off
                              -the one thing I did want changed was the scoring on engi repairs (another metal I’ll never get)…..and who in their right mind would play an IO game with an engi (just a lame move….play CS if you want IO, they do it better anyway)
                              -The rest is pretty meaningless, just to give the appearance of fixing the games underlying issues (remember all these problems when you spend $50 on BF2142, and remember we told you so…..and yes I already have my preorder in, but I’m a masochist)
                              -did anyone notice the financial losses that DICE took this qtr, they can’t code or improve work efficiency….I don’t know why EA would buy them….ow yeah, they cant turn a profit either.

                              Comment

                              • Maverick2201

                                #60
                                Re: Patch 1.4 Statement from Dice

                                well... for starters, you only have 5 AT rockets and they're a hell of a lot harder to hit someone at distance with than a sniper rifle (slower projectile and no zoom)... Think about it... If sniper rifles were one hit/one kill, EVERYBODY would be sniper and the game would cease to be fun... I like the rifles the way they are (i wish the zoom and accuracy was a tad better but whatever)... but why wouldn't you be able to hit someone with an AT rocket if you wanted to?

                                Comment

                                Working...