eMachines not so bad?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SO19Visionaries

    #16
    Re: eMachines not so bad?

    yeh its an AMD 64 althon 3400+ which is a socket 754 processor, unless they have updated it recently :-/ which means it doesn't actually support dual channel memory, but the e-machines has dual channel memory, so either my information is wrong or emachines is wrong.

    Comment

    • bloodie73

      #17
      Re: eMachines not so bad?

      Oh, well it sucks that the 3400+ didnt have 2000MHz(1000x2) system bus

      Still, nice buy, except for the vid card IMO.

      Comment

      • SO19Visionaries

        #18
        Re: eMachines not so bad?

        Originally posted by lil_jimmy_norton
        No it's 939, 754s can't have dual channel RAM.

        according to the AMD website socket 939 athlon 3400+ dont actually exist.


        heh this e-machines pc is turning out to be somewhat of an enigma!

        Comment

        • bloodie73

          #19
          Re: eMachines not so bad?

          Originally posted by SO19Visionaries
          according to the AMD website socket 939 athlon 3400+ dont actually exist.


          heh this e-machines pc is turning out to be somewhat of an enigma!
          hmm...time to check with cpu-z!

          Comment

          • lil_jimmy_norton

            #20
            Re: eMachines not so bad?

            The socket 745 3400 is 2.4Ghz, it is not 754 it is 939. Just because it isn't sold in stores doent' mean AMD doesn't make it. They will make special products for manufacturers.

            Comment

            • SO19Visionaries

              #21
              Re: eMachines not so bad?

              Originally posted by lil_jimmy_norton
              The socket 745 3400 is 2.0Ghz, it is not 754 it is 939. Just because it isn't sold in stores doent' mean AMD doesn't make it. They will make special products for manufacturers.

              no it doesn't actually exist on amd's official website

              Comment

              • lil_jimmy_norton

                #22
                Re: eMachines not so bad?



                Pwnt!

                It's the same as the 3500+, just with a lower HTT frequency.

                Comment

                • bloodie73

                  #23
                  Re: eMachines not so bad?

                  Nice find...so this means my friend's AMD 3300+ does exist after all....

                  Comment

                  • -[MDS]-Stormy

                    #24
                    Re: eMachines not so bad?

                    Originally posted by SO19Visionaries
                    no it doesn't actually exist on amd's official website
                    Try finding info about an Athlon XP2900+, same sort of thing. TigerDirect had a bunch of them a year or so ago, and they most likely got them as overstock or whatever from HP/Gateway (or whichever one of them was selling systems with that cpu in it). AMD for quite a while now has been putting out off-numbered cpu's for places like HP.

                    Also FWIW it is a socket 939, here's the motherboard that is in that E-machine,



                    or go here, http://parts.emachines.com/emachines/sys_lookup.asp and look up the model number T6420.

                    Comment

                    • SO19Visionaries

                      #25
                      Re: eMachines not so bad?

                      eh, then the AMD website is wrong, they have that 3400+ 2.2ghz processor down as a socket 754

                      then yes you have hought yourself a very nice pc i suppose, still could have built it cheaper though with better components :-p

                      Comment

                      • lil_jimmy_norton

                        #26
                        Re: eMachines not so bad?

                        And to further prove it exists...



                        From what I've read AMD originally manufactured them for an OEM, the OEM changed their mind after manufacturing was done, so AMD dumped them on the market, but never officially acknowledged them.

                        Comment

                        • lil_jimmy_norton

                          #27
                          Re: eMachines not so bad?

                          Originally posted by SO19Visionaries
                          eh, then the AMD website is wrong, they have that 3400+ 2.2ghz processor down as a socket 754

                          then yes you have hought yourself a very nice pc i suppose, still could have built it cheaper though with better components :-p

                          Post up what's you'd build here, better than that for under $600. I don't think you can.

                          EDIT: using all new components of course.

                          Comment

                          • SO19Visionaries

                            #28
                            Re: eMachines not so bad?

                            i dont live in america so i won't be the best at price hunting.. but ok and its not $600 its $770 cos of the added graphics card!

                            Comment

                            • lil_jimmy_norton

                              #29
                              Re: eMachines not so bad?

                              We're not talking about the graphics card, just the box, we all agree he overpaid on the GFX card.

                              Comment

                              • Alm()nd J()y
                                Member
                                • Oct 2006
                                • 1209

                                #30
                                Re: eMachines not so bad?

                                Wow, this thread all of a sudden became popular. The vid card we got isn't the best, but he only plays Everquest 2. But it seems like a great PC for the price.

                                Comment

                                Working...